Constraint-based strain design using continuous modifications (CosMos) of flux bounds finds new strategies for metabolic engineering.

In recent years, a growing number of metabolic engineering strain design techniques have employed constraint-based modeling to determine metabolic and regulatory network changes which are needed to improve chemical production. These methods use systems-level analysis of metabolism to help guide experimental efforts by identifying deletions, additions, downregulations, and upregulations of metabolic genes that will increase biological production of a desired metabolic product. In this work, we propose a new strain design method with continuous modifications (CosMos) that provides strategies for deletions, downregulations, and upregulations of fluxes that will lead to the production of the desired products. The method is conceptually simple and easy to implement, and can provide additional strategies over current approaches. We found that the method was able to find strain design strategies that required fewer modifications and had larger predicted yields than strategies from previous methods in example and genome-scale networks. Using CosMos, we identified modification strategies for producing a variety of metabolic products, compared strategies derived from Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic models, and examined how imperfect implementation may affect experimental outcomes. This study gives a powerful and flexible technique for strain engineering and examines some of the unexpected outcomes that may arise when strategies are implemented experimentally.

[1]  K Hashiguchi,et al.  Effects of a feedback-resistant aspartokinase III gene on L-isoleucine production in Escherichia coli K-12. , 1999, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[2]  Miguel Rocha,et al.  OptFlux: an open-source software platform for in silico metabolic engineering , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[3]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Connecting Extracellular Metabolomic Measurements to Intracellular Flux States in Yeast , 2022 .

[4]  R. Mahadevan,et al.  The effects of alternate optimal solutions in constraint-based genome-scale metabolic models. , 2003, Metabolic engineering.

[5]  G. Church,et al.  Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks , 2002 .

[6]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Model-driven evaluation of the production potential for growth-coupled products of Escherichia coli. , 2010, Metabolic engineering.

[7]  C. Maranas,et al.  An optimization framework for identifying reaction activation/inhibition or elimination candidates for overproduction in microbial systems. , 2006, Metabolic engineering.

[8]  F. Srienc,et al.  Elementary mode analysis: a useful metabolic pathway analysis tool for characterizing cellular metabolism , 2009, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A comprehensive genome-scale reconstruction of Escherichia coli metabolism—2011 , 2011, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  J. Reed,et al.  Large-Scale Bi-Level Strain Design Approaches and Mixed-Integer Programming Solution Techniques , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Jennifer L. Reed,et al.  OptORF: Optimal metabolic and regulatory perturbations for metabolic engineering of microbial strains , 2010, BMC Systems Biology.

[12]  J. Reed,et al.  RELATCH: relative optimality in metabolic networks explains robust metabolic and regulatory responses to perturbations , 2012, Genome Biology.

[13]  Christoph Wittmann,et al.  Flux Design: In silico design of cell factories based on correlation of pathway fluxes to desired properties , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[14]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[15]  Costas D Maranas,et al.  OptStrain: a computational framework for redesign of microbial production systems. , 2004, Genome research.

[16]  M. Wada,et al.  Effect of cysteine desulfhydrase gene disruption on l-cysteine overproduction in Escherichia coli , 2003, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  Tomer Shlomi,et al.  Predicting metabolic engineering knockout strategies for chemical production: accounting for competing pathways , 2010, Bioinform..

[18]  A. Burgard,et al.  Minimal Reaction Sets for Escherichia coli Metabolism under Different Growth Requirements and Uptake Environments , 2001, Biotechnology progress.

[19]  Jeffrey D Orth,et al.  What is flux balance analysis? , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Costas D. Maranas,et al.  OptForce: An Optimization Procedure for Identifying All Genetic Manipulations Leading to Targeted Overproductions , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[21]  K. Patil,et al.  Enhancing sesquiterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through in silico driven metabolic engineering. , 2009, Metabolic engineering.

[22]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks , 2004, Bioinform..

[23]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  A genome-scale metabolic reconstruction for Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 that accounts for 1260 ORFs and thermodynamic information , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[24]  Sang Yup Lee,et al.  Prediction of metabolic fluxes by incorporating genomic context and flux-converging pattern analyses , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Burgard,et al.  Optknock: A bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  Yudi Yang,et al.  Genome-scale in silico aided metabolic analysis and flux comparisons of Escherichia coli to improve succinate production , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.