Increased persistence of antifouling paint biocides when associated with paint particles.

Current regulatory risk assessment procedures only assess the impact of antifouling paint biocides that are released through leaching from a painted surface. Hull cleaning activities can lead to particles of antifouling paint containing biocides to enter the environment. Comparative pseudo-first order anaerobic degradation rate constants and half-lives were determined for a selection of common antifouling paint booster biocides, their degradation products, and associated with paint particles. Anaerobic half-lives of <0.5 days were calculated for chlorothalonil, dichlofluanid, and SeaNine 211, between 1 and 3 days for DCPMU and DCPU, between 14 and 35 days for diuron and CPDU, and over 226 days for GS26575 and Irgarol 1051. Increased persistence was observed when the compounds were introduced to sediments associated with antifouling paint particles. When present as antifouling paint particles, an increased half-life of 9.9 days for SeaNine 211 and 1.4 days was calculated for dichlofluanid, no significant degradation was observed for diuron. It is suspected that this is due to much of the biocide being initially bound within the matrix of the paint particle that is slowly released through dissolution processes into the sediment pore water prior to degradation. The release of booster biocides associated with paint particles into marinas has the potential to lead to their accumulation unless activities such as hull cleaning are strictly regulated.

[1]  Heinrich Hühnerfuss,et al.  Concentrations of the Antifouling Compound Irgarol 1051 and of Organotins in Water and Sediments of German North and Baltic Sea Marinas , 2000 .

[2]  M. Unger,et al.  Sorption behavior of tributyltin on estuarine and freshwater sediments , 1988 .

[3]  Jeffrey P. Jones,et al.  Designing safer chemicals: predicting the rates of metabolism of halogenated alkanes. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  K. Solomon,et al.  An ecological risk assessment for the use of Irgarol 1051 as an algaecide for antifoulant paints. , 1999, Critical reviews in toxicology.

[5]  F. Stuer-Lauridsen,et al.  Source of organotin at a marine water/sediment interface — A field study , 1995 .

[6]  L. D. de Alencastro,et al.  Irgarol 1051, an Antifouling Compound in Freshwater, Sediment, and Biota of Lake Geneva , 1996, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[7]  M. Gough,et al.  A survey of southern England coastal waters for the s-triazine antifouling compound irgarol 1051 , 1994 .

[8]  T. Albanis,et al.  Photodegradation study of the antifouling booster biocide dichlofluanid in aqueous media by gas chromatographic techniques. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  M. Waldock,et al.  Antifouling paint booster biocides in UK coastal waters: inputs, occurrence and environmental fate. , 2002, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  N. Camper,et al.  Anaerobic microbial degradation of diuron by pond sediment , 1982 .

[11]  Brian G. Brownlee,et al.  Aquatic environmental chemistry of 2‐(thiocyanomethylthio)benzothiazole and related benzothiazoles , 1992 .

[12]  J C Ritter,et al.  Pyrithiones as antifoulants: Environmental chemistry and preliminary risk assessment , 2000, Biofouling.

[13]  R. Maguire,et al.  Occurrence and Seasonal Variation of Tributyltin in Marinas on Lake Ontario, Canada , 2000 .

[14]  G. L. Willingham,et al.  Designing an Environmentally Safe Marine Antifoulant , 1996 .

[15]  KV Thomas The environmental fate and behaviour of antifouling paint booster biocides: A review , 2001 .