A novel weighted cumulative delta-check method for highly sensitive detection of specimen mix-up in the clinical laboratory

Abstract Background: We sought to detect specimen mix-up by developing a new cumulative delta-check method applicable to a mixture of test items with heterogeneous units and distribution patterns. Methods: The distributions of all test results were successfully made Gaussian using power transformation. Values were then standardized into z-score (zx) based on reference interval (RI) so that limits of RI take zx=±1.96. To find a weight for summing absolute value of delta between current and previous zx (Dz), we evaluated the distribution of Dz. Its central portion was always regarded as Gaussian despite the presence of symmetrical long tails. Thus, an adjusted SD (aSD) representing the center was estimated with an iterative method. By setting 1/aSD2 as a weight factor, we computed a weighted mean of Dz as an index for specimen mix-up (wCDI). Results: The performance of wCDI was evaluated, using a model laboratory database consisting of 32 basic test items, by a simulation study generating artificial cases of mix-up. When wCDI was computed from three commonly ordered test sets consisting of 6–9 items each, its diagnostic efficiency in detecting the artificial cases was 0.937–0.967 expressed as area under ROC curves (AUC). When the performance of wCDI was evaluated simply by the number of test items (p) included in the computation, AUC gradually increased from 0.944 (p=5) to 0.976 (p=8). However, when p≥10, AUC stayed at approximately 0.98. Conclusions: wCDI was proven to be highly effective in uncovering cases of specimen mix-up. The diagnostic efficiency of wCDI depends only on the number of test items included in the computation.

[1]  M. G. Bissell Patient Misidentification in Laboratory Medicine: A Qualitative Analysis of 227 Root Cause Analysis Reports in the Veterans Health Administration , 2011 .

[2]  K. Ichihara,et al.  An iterative method for improved estimation of the mean of peer-group distributions in proficiency testing , 2005, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[3]  Stuart R Lipsitz,et al.  Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  K. Ichihara,et al.  Determination of reference intervals for 13 plasma proteins based on IFCC international reference preparation (CRM470) and NCCLS proposed guideline (C28‐P, 1992): Trial to select reference individuals by results of screening tests and application of maximal likelihood method , 1996, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[5]  J S Nosanchuk,et al.  CUMS and delta checks. A systematic approach to quality control. , 1974, American journal of clinical pathology.

[6]  Kiyoshi Ichihara,et al.  An appraisal of statistical procedures used in derivation of reference intervals , 2010, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[7]  K. Quillen,et al.  Quality improvement to decrease specimen mislabeling in transfusion medicine. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[9]  Mario Plebani,et al.  Exploring the initial steps of the testing process: frequency and nature of pre-preanalytic errors. , 2012, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  L B Sheiner,et al.  The performance of delta check methods. , 1979, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  The Chi-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Test for Count-Data Models , 2014 .