A novel weighted cumulative delta-check method for highly sensitive detection of specimen mix-up in the clinical laboratory
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. G. Bissell. Patient Misidentification in Laboratory Medicine: A Qualitative Analysis of 227 Root Cause Analysis Reports in the Veterans Health Administration , 2011 .
[2] K. Ichihara,et al. An iterative method for improved estimation of the mean of peer-group distributions in proficiency testing , 2005, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[3] Stuart R Lipsitz,et al. Reduction in specimen labeling errors after implementation of a positive patient identification system in phlebotomy. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.
[4] K. Ichihara,et al. Determination of reference intervals for 13 plasma proteins based on IFCC international reference preparation (CRM470) and NCCLS proposed guideline (C28‐P, 1992): Trial to select reference individuals by results of screening tests and application of maximal likelihood method , 1996, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.
[5] J S Nosanchuk,et al. CUMS and delta checks. A systematic approach to quality control. , 1974, American journal of clinical pathology.
[6] Kiyoshi Ichihara,et al. An appraisal of statistical procedures used in derivation of reference intervals , 2010, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.
[7] K. Quillen,et al. Quality improvement to decrease specimen mislabeling in transfusion medicine. , 2006, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.
[8] M. Zweig,et al. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.
[9] Mario Plebani,et al. Exploring the initial steps of the testing process: frequency and nature of pre-preanalytic errors. , 2012, Clinical chemistry.
[10] L B Sheiner,et al. The performance of delta check methods. , 1979, Clinical chemistry.
[11] The Chi-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Test for Count-Data Models , 2014 .