The biomechanics of force production.

To interact mechanically with the world and especially to use hand tools we exert force. However, the biomechanical consequences of force production can be challenging. In particular, due to the nonlinear kinematics of the mammalian skeleton and of typical hand tools, exerting force can destabilize posture, compromising the ability to control force. In this chapter we present a simplified analysis of this phenomenon that shows how the destabilizing effect of force production varies with pose and tool geometry, and how it may be offset by neuro-muscular stiffness. We also show that in some circumstances the limits of force production may, in fact, be due to a limited ability to produce stiffness rather than a limited ability to produce force. An experimental confirmation of these predictions is presented.

[1]  Gerrit Jan van Ingen Schenau,et al.  The role of mono- and bi-articular muscles during contact control leg tasks in man , 1995 .

[2]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[3]  Rieko Osu,et al.  The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance , 2001, Nature.

[4]  R L Lieber.  Hypothesis: Biarticular Muscles Transfer Moments Between Joints , 1990, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[5]  T. Milner,et al.  Inability to activate muscles maximally during cocontraction and the effect on joint stiffness , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Gerrit Jan VAN INGEN SCHENAU,et al.  From rotation to translation: Constraints on multi-joint movements and the unique action of bi-articular muscles , 1989 .

[7]  N. Hogan.  Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[8]  C. Gielen,et al.  Activation patterns of mono‐ and bi‐articular arm muscles as a function of force and movement direction of the wrist in humans , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  A. Hof,et al.  The force resulting from the action of mono- and biarticular muscles in a limb. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[11]  T. Milner.  Contribution of geometry and joint stiffness to mechanical stability of the human arm , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[13]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Force Control with A Muscle-Activated Endoskeleton , 2006 .

[14]  M. Latash,et al.  Testing hypotheses and the advancement of science: recent attempts to falsify the equilibrium point hypothesis , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  David J. Ostry,et al.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Neville Hogan,et al.  SKELETAL MUSCLE IMPEDANCE IN THE CONTROL OF MOTOR ACTIONS , 2002 .

[18]  S Kornecki,et al.  The nature of the stabilizing functions of skeletal muscles. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Regulation of soleus muscle stiffness in premammillary cats: intrinsic and reflex components. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  N Hogan,et al.  Stability in Force-Production Tasks , 2001, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Human hand impedance characteristics during maintained posture , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[22]  S Kornecki,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of human arm stabilization during force production. , 1982, Journal of biomechanics.