Canopy Gap Mapping from Airborne Laser Scanning: An Assessment of the Positional and Geometrical Accuracy

Canopy gaps are small-scale openings in forest canopies which offer suitable micro-climatic conditions for tree regeneration. Field mapping of gaps is complex and time-consuming. Several studies have used Canopy Height Models (CHM) derived from airborne laser scanning (ALS) to delineate gaps but limited accuracy assessment has been carried out, especially regarding the gap geometry. In this study, we investigate three mapping methods based on raster layers produced from ALS leaf-off and leaf-on datasets: thresholding, per-pixel and per-object supervised classifications with Random Forest. In addition to the CHM, other metrics related to the canopy porosity are tested. The gap detection is good, with a global accuracy up to 82% and consumer’s accuracy often exceeding 90%. The Geometric Accuracy (GAc) was analyzed with the gap area, main orientation, gap shape-complexity index and a quantitative assessment index of the matching with reference gaps polygons. The GAc assessment shows difficulties in identifying a method which properly delineates gaps. The performance of CHM-based thresholding was exceeded by that of other methods, especially thresholding of canopy porosity rasters and the per-pixel supervised classification. Beyond assessing the methods performance, we argue the critical need for future ALS-based gap studies to consider the geometric accuracy of results.

[1]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Using airborne laser scanning data for detecting canopy gaps and their understory type in mature boreal forest , 2011, Annals of Forest Science.

[2]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Forest Canopy Gap Distributions in the Southern Peruvian Amazon , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  A. Watt,et al.  Pattern and process in the plant community , 1947 .

[4]  M. Alderweireld,et al.  Le chêne en forêt ardennaise, un atout à préserver , 2010 .

[5]  James R. Runkle,et al.  PATTERNS OF DISTURBANCE IN SOME OLD-GROWTH MESIC FORESTS OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA' , 1982 .

[6]  Doreen S. Boyd,et al.  Forest disturbance and regeneration: a mosaic of discrete gap dynamics and open matrix regimes? , 2014 .

[7]  G. Grandjean,et al.  Installation de régénérations feuillues dans de petites trouées en peuplements irréguliers , 1994 .

[8]  W. Platt,et al.  Gap Light Regimes Influence Canopy Tree Diversity , 1989 .

[9]  Jean-Michel Poggi,et al.  Variable selection using random forests , 2010, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[10]  Håkan Hytteborn,et al.  Small-scale disturbance and stand structure dynamics in an old-growth Picea abies forest over 54 yr in central Sweden , 2014 .

[11]  W. L. Mason,et al.  The transformation of conifer forests in Britain — regeneration, gap size and silvicultural systems , 2001 .

[12]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Patch dynamics and the development of structural and spatial heterogeneity in Pacific Northwest forests , 2011 .

[13]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R , 2005, Bioinform..

[14]  J. Diaci,et al.  Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in an old-growth Fagus–Abies forest of Bosnia–Herzegovina , 2010, Plant Ecology.

[15]  G. H. Stewart,et al.  Forest canopy gap detection and characterisation by the use of high- resolution Digital Elevation Models , 2005 .

[16]  Anne-Laure Jacquemart,et al.  Gaps promote plant diversity in beech forests (Luzulo-Fagetum), North Vosges, France , 2005 .

[17]  Keqi Zhang,et al.  Identification of gaps in mangrove forests with airborne LIDAR , 2008 .

[18]  M. Baatz,et al.  Progressing from object-based to object-oriented image analysis , 2008 .

[19]  Benoît St-Onge,et al.  Spatially explicit characterization of boreal forest gap dynamics using multi-temporal lidar data , 2008 .

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  D. Lindenmayera,et al.  General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation , 2006 .

[22]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Quantifying the spatial properties of forest canopy gaps using LiDAR imagery and GIS , 2004 .

[23]  Stephan Getzin,et al.  Assessing biodiversity in forests using very high‐resolution images and unmanned aerial vehicles , 2012 .

[24]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[25]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[26]  P. Balandier,et al.  Height competition between Quercus petraea and Fagus sylvatica natural regeneration in mixed and uneven-aged stands , 2013 .

[27]  George Alan Blackburn,et al.  Filling the gaps: remote sensing meets woodland ecology , 1996 .

[28]  M. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  A Photogrammetric Workflow for the Creation of a Forest Canopy Height Model from Small Unmanned Aerial System Imagery , 2013 .

[29]  D. Dobrowolska,et al.  Treefall-gap structure and regeneration in mixed Abies alba stands in central Poland , 2008 .

[30]  Kazimierz Becek,et al.  A comparison of different survey methods for assessing gap parameters in old-growth forests , 2011 .

[31]  M. Rautiainen,et al.  Estimation of forest canopy cover: A comparison of field measurement techniques , 2006 .

[32]  G. A. Blackburn,et al.  Spatial relationships between tree species and gap characteristics in broad-leaved deciduous woodland , 2005 .

[33]  Benoît St-Onge,et al.  Interactions of multiple disturbances in shaping boreal forest dynamics: a spatially explicit analysis using multi‐temporal lidar data and high‐resolution imagery , 2010 .

[34]  Felix Morsdorf,et al.  Estimation of Canopy Cover, Gap Fraction and Leaf Area Index with Airborne Laser Scanning , 2014 .

[35]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .

[36]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Landscape-scale forest disturbance regimes in southern Peruvian Amazonia. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  Martin Volk,et al.  The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[38]  Rachel Gaulton,et al.  LiDAR mapping of canopy gaps in continuous cover forests: A comparison of canopy height model and point cloud based techniques , 2010 .

[39]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[40]  D. Sheil,et al.  Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures , 1999 .

[41]  N. Brokaw,et al.  The definition of treefall gap and its effect on measures of forest dynamics. , 1982 .

[42]  Robert S. Nuske,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) to Quantify Spatial Gap Patterns in Forests , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[43]  P. Gong,et al.  Accuracy Assessment Measures for Object-based Image Segmentation Goodness , 2010 .

[44]  Alex C. Lee,et al.  A LiDAR-derived canopy density model for tree stem and crown mapping in Australian forests , 2007 .

[45]  Ute Beyer,et al.  Remote Sensing And Image Interpretation , 2016 .

[46]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[47]  James G. Bockheim,et al.  Methods for studying treefall gaps: A review , 2011 .

[48]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .