Neural evolution for collision detection and resolution in a 2D free flight environment

During the last decade, air traffic movements worldwide have experienced a tremendous growth. Future air traffic management concepts such as Free Flight have been proposed to provide a means by which traffic flow efficiency can be increased. Under Free Flight, the current methods of airways and way-points for separation assurance won’t exist, providing an aircraft pilot more flexibility to follow more optimized routes given the ever changing nature of a flight plan (bad weather, delays, special use airspace, and runway closure/emergencies etc.). In order to compensate for the loss of airway structure, automated conflict detection and resolution tools will be required to aid pilots in ensuring safety and smooth flow of air traffic. The main challenge is to develop a robust and efficient algorithm to achieve real time performance for large and complex scenarios in a Free Flight Airspace. This paper investigates preliminary design and implementation issues in two dimensions for evolutionary techniques in collision avoidance. Such techniques may find solutions in much a shorter time than classical collision avoidance algorithms. The preliminary results demonstrate that an artificial neural network (ANN) can be trained to compute near optimal trajectories to solve two aircraft conflicts with high reliability while maintaining the mission trajectory towards the destination.

[1]  John Lygeros,et al.  A probabilistic framework for aircraft conflict detection. , 1999 .

[2]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Obstacle avoidance in a dynamic environment: a collision cone approach , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[3]  William P. Niedringhaus Stream Option Manager (SOM): automated integration of aircraft separation, merging, stream management, and other air traffic control functions , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[4]  R. Lachner,et al.  Collision avoidance as a differential game: real-time approximation of optimal strategies using higher derivatives of the value function , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Computational Cybernetics and Simulation.

[5]  I. Parberry,et al.  A Method for Searching Optimal Routes with Collision Avoidance on Raster Charts , 2003, Journal of Navigation.

[6]  Aaron E. Rosenberg,et al.  Considerations in dynamic time warping algorithms for discrete word recognition , 1978 .

[7]  John Lygeros,et al.  A probabilistic approach to aircraft conflict detection , 2000, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[8]  S. Levinson,et al.  Considerations in dynamic time warping algorithms for discrete word recognition , 1978 .

[9]  R.N.H.W. van Gent,et al.  CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF FREE FLIGHT WITH AIRBORNE SEPARATION ASSURANCE , 1998 .

[10]  Sean R Eddy,et al.  What is dynamic programming? , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  Automatic Generation of Controllers for Embodied Legged Organisms: A Pareto Evolutionary Multi-Objective Approach , 2004, Evolutionary Computation.