Social network analysis in accounting information systems research

This paper introduces social network analysis as an alternative research method for conducting accounting information systems related research. With advances in information and communication technologies, transaction data are being recorded in electronic form, resulting in a variety of research opportunities to examine dyadic interactions. A network consists of a set of nodes connected by ties. Social network research focuses on how outcomes are influenced not just by the attributes of the nodes (e.g. individuals), but also by the ties connecting nodes to each other. The nodes are typically conceptualized as actors, such as individuals, teams, or organizations. A unique network structure is created to reflect each different type of tie, such as trust, advice, collocation, or organizational affiliation. Social network analysis can be used for research examining individual, dyadic or network levels of analyses, and is a powerful tool for conducting multi-method research. Given the vast amounts of trace electronic data collected via accounting information systems, this paper reviews how social network analysis not only opens new research avenues for accounting information systems researchers, but identifies opportunities for the field of accounting information systems to inform social network research by identifying new network structures and dynamics leveraging transactional data.

[1]  Robin L. Wakefield.  Networks of accounting research: A citation-based structural and network analysis , 2008 .

[2]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[3]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  GIS for District-Level Administration in India: Problems and Opportunities , 1999, MIS Q..

[4]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Knowledge Sharing Among Accounting Academics in an Electronic Network of Practice , 2009 .

[5]  Taya M. Malone,et al.  The Future of Work: How the New Order of Business Will Shape Your Organization, Your Management Style and Your Life , 2004 .

[6]  Rob Cross,et al.  A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[9]  C. S. Chapman,et al.  Accountants in organisational networks , 1998 .

[10]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[11]  B. Latour.  On actor-network theory : A few clarifications , 1996 .

[12]  A. Richardson,et al.  Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting , 2009 .

[13]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[14]  E. Morrison,et al.  NEWCOMERS' RELATIONSHIPS: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL NETWORK TIES DURING SOCIALIZATION , 2002 .

[15]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points Through Life. , 1994 .

[16]  M. Oliverio.  Internal control—integrated framework: who is responsible? , 2001 .

[17]  Cindi Smatt,et al.  An investigation of the impact of the structure and quality of relationships on knowledge exchange and individual performance , 2009 .

[18]  Allen S. Lee,et al.  Information systems and qualitative research , 1997 .

[19]  B. Wellman,et al.  Studying On-Line Social Networks , 1999 .

[20]  Rebecca S. Katz,et al.  Re-Examining the Integrative Social Capital Theory of Crime , 2002 .

[21]  Rebecca S. Katz,et al.  Explaining Girls' and Women's Crime and Desistance in the Context of Their Victimization Experiences , 2000 .

[22]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User-System Interactions , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[23]  L. Freeman.  Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[24]  Mark R. Muldoon,et al.  The Small World of Corporate Boards , 2006 .

[25]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[26]  Marcia Weidenmier Watson,et al.  SOX 404 Reported Internal Control Weaknesses: A Test of COSO Framework Components and Information Technology , 2009, J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Rod Coombs,et al.  Fabricating budgets: A study of the production of management budgeting in the national health service , 1992 .

[28]  Joseph G. Davis,et al.  Social Network Analysis and Organizational Disintegration: The Case of Enron Corporation , 2007, ICIS.

[29]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[30]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Management Consultants: Systems Development, Power and the Translation of Problems , 1992 .

[31]  G. Walsham.  Actor-network theory and IS research: current status and future prospects , 1997 .

[32]  A. Hopwood,et al.  Looking across rather than up and down: On the need to explore the lateral processing of information , 1996 .

[33]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[34]  M. Callon.  Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[35]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Machines and manoeuvres: Responsibility accounting and the construction of hospital information systems , 1992 .

[36]  H. D. McKay,et al.  Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas , 1943 .

[37]  Steve Jones,et al.  Doing Internet Research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net@@@Life Online: Researching Real Experience in Virtual Space , 2000 .

[38]  Jan Mouritsen,et al.  Accounting, network complementarities and the development of inter-organisational relations , 2006 .

[39]  Bertrand Masquefa,et al.  Top Management Adoption of a Locally Driven Performance Measurement and Evaluation System: A Social Network Perspective , 2008 .

[40]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Getting by with the Advice of Their Friends: CEOs' Advice Networks and Firms' Strategic Responses to Poor Performance , 2003 .

[41]  S. Borgatti,et al.  The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology , 2003 .

[42]  Ofir Turel,et al.  IT and the Board of Directors: An Empirical Investigation into the "Governance Questions" Canadian Board Members Ask about IT , 2010, J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Paul L. Bowen,et al.  Enhancing IT governance practices: A model and case study of an organization's efforts , 2007, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[44]  Lawrence Hubert,et al.  The Analysis of Social Interaction Data , 1981 .

[45]  R. Gulati,et al.  Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From?1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.