How Our Personality Shapes Our Interactions with Virtual Characters - Implications for Research and Development

There is a general lack of awareness for the influence of users' personality traits on human-agent-interaction (HAI). Numerous studies do not even consider explanatory variables like age and gender although they are easily accessible. The present study focuses on explaining the occurrence of social effects in HAI. Apart from the original manipulation of the study we assessed the users' personality traits. Results show that participants' personality traits influenced their subjective feeling after the interaction, as well as their evaluation of the virtual character and their actual behavior. From the various personality traits those traits which relate to persistent behavioral patterns in social contact (agreeableness, extraversion, approach avoidance, self-efficacy in monitoring others, shyness, public self-consciousness) were found to be predictive, whereas other personality traits and gender and age did not affect the evaluation. Results suggest that personality traits are better predictors for the evaluation outcome than the actual behavior of the agent as it has been manipulated in the experiment. Implications for research on and development of virtual agents are discussed.

[1]  Mukul Mukherjee,et al.  Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 14 , 2005 .

[2]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The unwillingness‐to‐communicate scale: Development and validation , 1976 .

[3]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  The Self-Consciousness Scale: A revised version for use with general populations. , 1985 .

[4]  S. Kopp,et al.  The Effects of an Embodied Agent´s Nonverbal Behavior on User's Evaluation and Behavioral Mimicry , 2007 .

[5]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Effects of Humor in Task-Oriented Human-Computer Interaction and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Direct Test of SRCT Theory , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[6]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  Equilibrium Theory Revisited: Mutual Gaze and Personal Space in Virtual Environments , 2001, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[7]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  "It doesn't matter what you are!" Explaining social effects of agents and avatars , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Person Perception by Introverts and Extraverts Under Time Pressure: Effects of Need for Closure , 1991 .

[9]  M. Slater,et al.  An experiment on fear of public speaking in virtual reality. , 2001, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.

[10]  Brent Rossen,et al.  Virtual Humans Elicit Skin-Tone Bias Consistent with Real-World Skin-Tone Biases , 2008, IVA.

[11]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Reading personality in onscreen interactive characters: an examination of social psychological principles of consistency, personality match, and situational attribution applied to interaction with characters , 1998 .

[12]  Sebastiano Pizzutilo,et al.  Cooperative Interface Agents , 2002 .

[13]  O. John,et al.  Los Cinco Grandes across cultures and ethnic groups: multitrait multimethod analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[15]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  J. Cassell,et al.  Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents , 2005 .

[17]  J. Cassell,et al.  SOCIAL DIALOGUE WITH EMBODIED CONVERSATIONAL AGENTS , 2005 .

[18]  R. Lennox,et al.  Revision of the self-monitoring scale. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Thomas Rist,et al.  Controlling the Behavior of Animated Presentation Agents in the Interface: Scripting versus Instructing , 2001, AI Mag..

[20]  N. Badler,et al.  Toward Representing Agent Behaviors Modified by Personality and Emotion , 2002 .

[21]  Stacy Marsella,et al.  Virtual Rapport , 2006, IVA.

[22]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. Loomis,et al.  Interpersonal Distance in Immersive Virtual Environments , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[25]  Ning Wang,et al.  Agreeable People Like Agreeable Virtual Humans , 2008, IVA.

[26]  Ning Wang,et al.  Does the contingency of agents' nonverbal feedback affect users' social anxiety? , 2008, AAMAS.

[27]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[28]  Charles S. Carver,et al.  Social Anxiety and Social Perception: Construing Others' Reactions to the Self , 1991 .

[29]  Carla H. Lagorio,et al.  Psychology , 1929, Nature.

[30]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[31]  Maria E. Jabon,et al.  The Expression of Personality in Virtual Worlds , 2011 .

[32]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  The Effects of an Embodied Conversational Agent's Nonverbal Behavior on User's Evaluation and Behavioral Mimicry , 2007, IVA.

[33]  C. Nass,et al.  How “Real” Are Computer Personalities? , 1996 .

[34]  Rosalind W. Picard,et al.  Establishing the computer-patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions. , 2005, Patient education and counseling.

[35]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Accuracy of the Five-Factor Model in Predicting Perceptions of Daily Social Interactions , 1997 .

[36]  J. Gratch,et al.  Who Is there? Can a Virtual Agent Really Elicit Social Presence? , 2009 .

[37]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  Media Equation Revisited: Do Users Show Polite Reactions towards an Embodied Agent? , 2009, IVA.

[38]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Computers are social actors: a review of current research , 1997 .