Board Composition and Corporate Performance: How the Australian Experience Informs Contrasting Theories of Corporate Governance

In many respects, Australian boards more closely approach normative “best practice” guidelines for corporate governance than boards in other Western countries. Do Australian firms then demonstrate a board demographic-organisational performance link that has not been found in other economies? We examine the relationships between board demographics and corporate performance in 348 of Australia’s largest publicly listed companies and describe the attributes of these firms and their boards. We find that, after controlling for firm size, board size is positively correlated with firm value. We also find a positive relationship between the proportion of inside directors and the market-based measure of firm performance. We discuss the implications of these findings and compare our findings to prevailing research in the US and the UK.

[1]  L. Donaldson The Ethereal Hand: Organizational Economics and Management Theory , 1990 .

[2]  N. O’Sullivan Managers as Monitors: An Analysis of the Non-executive Role of Senior Executives in UK Companies , 2000 .

[3]  Chamu Sundaramurthy,et al.  Board Composition and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis of the Influence of outside Directors , 2000 .

[4]  H. N. Butler,et al.  Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition , 1985 .

[5]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda: , 1996 .

[6]  Ramona L. Paetzold,et al.  The Resource Dependence Role of Corporate Directors: Strategic Adaptation of Board Composition in Response to Environmental Change , 2000 .

[7]  I. Kesner,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between board composition and stockholder suits , 1990 .

[8]  J. Pound,et al.  The promise of the governed corporation , 1995 .

[9]  Nilanjan Sen,et al.  An examination of the relationship of governance mechanisms to performance , 2001 .

[10]  Z. Matolcsy,et al.  Do Independent Directors Add Value , 2004 .

[11]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns , 1991 .

[12]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[13]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[14]  Philip Stiles,et al.  Benchmarking corporate governance: The impact of the Cadbury Code , 1993 .

[15]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[16]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[17]  James D. Westphal Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties , 1999 .

[18]  M. Alexander,et al.  Business power in Australia: The concentration of company directorship holding among the top 250 corporates , 1994 .

[19]  Stephen W. Pruitt,et al.  A Simple Approximation of Tobin's Q , 1994 .

[20]  J. Pfeffer Size, Composition, and Function of Hospital Boards of Directors: A Study of Organization-Environment Linkage , 1973 .

[21]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms , 1992 .

[22]  M. Clarkson A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[23]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature , 2000 .

[24]  Jay W. Lorsch,et al.  Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards , 1989 .

[25]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS OF BOARD COMPOSITION, LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[26]  Philip H. Burch The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U.S. and U.K . By Michael Useem. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1984. Pp. xii + 246. $22.95.) , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[27]  Scott W. Barnhart,et al.  Firm performance and board composition: Some new evidence , 1994 .

[28]  Simon Peck,et al.  Board Control, Remuneration Committees, and Top Management Compensation , 1998 .

[29]  D. Yermack Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors , 1996 .

[30]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The relative power of ceos and boards of directors: Associations with corporate performance , 1991 .

[31]  Philip L. Cochran,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance , 1984 .

[32]  W. Grossman,et al.  CEO pay at the crossroads of Wall Street and Main: Toward the strategic design of executive compensation , 1998 .

[33]  V. Mahajan,et al.  CORPORATE BOARD SIZE, COMPOSITION AND CORPORATE FAILURES IN RETAILING INDUSTRY[1] , 1985 .

[34]  R. Rao,et al.  Corporate governance in New Zealand: The effect of the 1993 Companies Act on the relation between board composition and firm performance , 2001 .

[35]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Structure of Corporate Political Action: Interfirm Relations and Their Consequences. , 1992 .

[36]  Maurice Zeitlin,et al.  Corporate Ownership and Control: The Large Corporation and the Capitalist Class , 1974, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  Sanjai Bhagat,et al.  - 1-BOARD INDEPENDENCE AND LONG-TERM FIRM PERFORMANCE , 2000 .

[38]  Sanjai Bhagat,et al.  The Non-Correlation between Board Independence And Long-Term Firm Performance , 1998 .

[39]  Kenneth Kasa,et al.  Common stochastic trends in international stock markets , 1992 .

[40]  M. H. Song,et al.  Managerial ownership, board structure, and the division of gains in divestitures , 2000 .

[41]  J. L. Stimpert,et al.  BOARD COMPOSITION AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: TWO STUDIES OF INSIDER/OUTSIDER EFFECTS , 1998 .

[42]  Paula L. Rechner,et al.  The Impact of CEO as Board Chairperson on Corporate Performance: Evidence vs. Rhetoric , 1989 .

[43]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Formation of Interlocking Directorates , 1988 .

[44]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications , 1993 .

[45]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  Boards and Company Performance ‐ Research Challenges the Conventional Wisdom , 1994 .

[46]  M. Mizruchi What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates , 1996 .

[47]  Bruce W. Stening,et al.  Interlocking Directorates Among Australia's Largest 250 Corporations 1959-1979 , 1984 .

[48]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  CEO DUALITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: A CONTINGENCY MODEL , 1995 .

[49]  L. Donaldson,et al.  Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach , 1998 .

[50]  Michael C. Jensen,et al.  The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems , 1993, A Theory of the Firm.

[51]  Martin T. Wells,et al.  Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms 1 We wish to thank Asiakastieto Oy for fu , 1998 .

[52]  R. Rumelt,et al.  Diversification strategy and profitability , 1982 .

[53]  David Laing,et al.  Governance structures, director independence and corporate performance in the UK , 2001 .

[54]  Michael Useem,et al.  The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and the Rise of Business Political Activity in the U. S. and U.K. , 1986 .

[55]  G. Nicholson,et al.  Real world governance: Driving business success through effective corporate governance , 2002 .

[56]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  CEO Duality as a Double-Edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Command , 1994 .

[57]  E. Fama Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[58]  Scott W. Barnhart,et al.  Board Composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis , 1998 .

[59]  M. Conyon,et al.  Board size and corporate performance: evidence from European countries , 1998 .

[60]  Benjamin E. Hermalin,et al.  The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance , 1991 .

[61]  K BoydB CEO(経営執行役員)の二元性と企業業績 状況適応型モデル , 1995 .

[62]  E. Lindenberg,et al.  Tobin's q Ratio and Industrial Organization , 1981 .

[63]  D. Cameron,et al.  The business who's who of Australia 1974 , 1974 .

[64]  F. Eugene FAMA, . Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance, Journal of Financial Economics . , 1998 .

[65]  N. Arthur Board composition as the outcome of an internal bargaining process: empirical evidence , 2001 .

[66]  Magda Bianco,et al.  Italian corporate governance:: Effects on financial structure and firm performance , 1999 .

[67]  Sanjai Bhagat,et al.  The Uncertain Relationship between Board Composition and Firm Performance , 1997 .

[68]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[69]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[70]  J. Pfeffer Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its Environment , 1972 .

[71]  D. Wheeler,et al.  Including the stakeholders: The business case , 1998 .

[72]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance , 1994 .

[73]  John Scott NETWORKS OF CORPORATE POWER: A Comparative Assessment , 1991 .

[74]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1999 .

[75]  E. Fama Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance , 1997 .

[76]  Mayer N. Zald,et al.  The Power and Functions of Boards of Directors: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1969, American Journal of Sociology.

[77]  Mark S. Mizruchi,et al.  Board Composition and Corporate Financing: The Impact of Financial Institution Representation on Borrowing , 1993 .

[78]  K. Eisenhardt Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[79]  C. Subramaniam,et al.  Executive Compensation: Excessive or Equitable? , 2001 .

[80]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  On studying managerial elites , 1992 .

[81]  E. Fama,et al.  Separation of Ownership and Control , 1983, The Journal of Law and Economics.