Heart and Kidney Transplantation from Segregating Hybrid to Parental Rats

We have plans for testing the one locus hypothesis of organ transplantation in a number of strain combinations, and will present here the data obtained from the two first combinations tested. The technique of kidney grafting follows with minor modifications the one used earlier in this laboratory (Sakai, Simonsen & Jensen 1969). The technique of heart grafting is as described by Pettirossi et al. (1968) whereby the heart is joined to the recipient's aorta and inferior v. cava as an accessory abdominal heart. The test consists in a comparison of the fate of kidney, heart, and skin grafts from individual donors belonging to segregating hybrid populations (F2 or back-cross) to different recipients of one of the parental strains. The donors are typed for the presence or absence of the foreign Ag-B allele prior to grafting, by serotyping and by MLC. As illustrated by Figure 1 there was complete agreement between serotyping and MLC, as shown by the fact that stimulation of AS cells always and only occurred with cells from hybrids which serotyping had shown to contain the AS2 haemagglutinogen presumed to be determined by Ag-B. The survival data for the three kinds of grafts are given in Tables I and II. Table I contains the data for the strain combination AS-AS2 with AS rats as recipients. This is the combination we began with, and is so far the one with the most extensive data. As we shall soon see it was not the most fortunate choice for a beginning. Group I demonstrates that the straightforward interstrain grafting from AS2 to AS leads to acute rejection in 10—12 days of both skin and kidney, whereas one of the grafted hearts is still beating after 106 days. The simple prediction from the one locus hypothesis (disregarding for the moment the possible effect of gene dosage) is that F2 and BC donors which

[1]  P. Nowell,et al.  QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ON THE MIXED LYMPHOCYTE INTERACTION IN RATS , 1971, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[2]  V. Defendi,et al.  EFFECT OF PRESENSITIZATION ON THE MIXED LYMPHOCYTE REACTION OF RAT SPLEEN CELL CULTURES , 1969, Transplantation.

[3]  W. Silvers,et al.  INFLUENCE OF THE Ag-B LOCUS ON REACTIVITY TO SKIN HOMOGRAFTS AND TOLERANCE RESPONSIVENESS IN RATS , 1969, Transplantation.

[4]  E. Thomas,et al.  CANINE MIXED LEUKOCYTE REACTIVITY AND TRANSPLANTATION ANTIGENS , 1969, Transplantation.

[5]  D. Davies THE MOLECULAR INDIVIDUALITY OF DIFFERENT MOUSE H-2 HISTOCOMPATIBILITY SPECIFICITIES DETERMINED BY SINGLE GENOTYPES , 1969, Transplantation.

[6]  M. Simonsen,et al.  KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION IN SIBLINGS , 1969 .

[7]  M. Simonsen,et al.  Kidney transplantation in siblings. Is immunosuppressive treatment invariably needed? , 1969, Transplantation.

[8]  M. Simonsen,et al.  THE FREQUENCY OF ANTIGEN-SENSITIVE CELLS IN TISSUE TRANSPLANTATION , 1969, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  K. Lafferty,et al.  Reactions of the graft versus host (GVH) type. , 1969, The Australian journal of experimental biology and medical science.

[10]  P. Iványi,et al.  Mixed lymphocyte cultures and histocompatibility antigens in mice. , 1969, Folia biologica.

[11]  K. Lafferty,et al.  The dermal reaction induced in sheep by homologous lymphocytes and an RNA fraction extracted from homologous lymphocytes. , 1968, Bibliotheca haematologica.

[12]  A. Sanderson HL-A Substances from Human Spleens , 1968, Nature.

[13]  D. B. Amos,et al.  PHENOTYPIC EXPRESSIONS OF THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LOCUS IN MAN (HL-A): LEUKOCYTE ANTIGENS AND MIXED LEUKOCYTE CULTURE REACTIVITY , 1968, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  S. Levine Local and regional forms of graft-versus-host disease in lymph nodes. , 1968, Transplantation.

[15]  B. Heslop Histocompatibility antigens in the rat: the AS2 strain in relation to the AS, BS and HS strains. , 1968, The Australian journal of experimental biology and medical science.

[16]  F. Fitch,et al.  Immunologic enhancement of renal allografts in the rat. , 1968, Surgery.

[17]  V. Křen,et al.  Histocompatibility. 1. Alleles in inbred rats of the BD II, WR, AGA, CDF, AS BS, HS and DA strains. , 1968, Folia biologica.

[18]  G. Snell The H-2 locus of the mouse: observations and speculations concerning its comparative genetics and its polymorphism. , 1968, Folia biologica.

[19]  M. Simonsen,et al.  Primary immune response in grafted cells. Dissociation between the proliferation of activity and the proliferation of cells , 1967 .

[20]  P. Nowell,et al.  QUANTITATIVE STUDIES ON THE MIXED LYMPHOCYTE INTERACTION IN RATS , 1967, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[21]  L. W. Schierman,et al.  Adjuvant Activity of Erythrocyte Isoantigens , 1967, Science.

[22]  W. Silvers,et al.  Mixed Leukocyte Reactions and Histocompatibility in Rats , 1967, Science.

[23]  M. Simonsen The Clonal Selection Hypothesis Evaluated by Grafted Cells Reacting Against their Hosts , 1967 .

[24]  W. L. Ford A local graft-versus-host reaction following intradermal injection of lymphocytes in the rat. , 1967, British journal of experimental pathology.

[25]  J. Palm,et al.  IDENTIFICATION OF A SINGLE STRONG HISTOCOMPATIBILITY LOCUS IN THE RAT BY NORMAL SPLEEN‐CELL TRANSFER * , 1966 .

[26]  P. Medawar,et al.  Quantitative studies on tissue transplantation immunity. VII. The normal lymphocyte transfer reaction , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[27]  A. Bateman STRONG TRANSPLANTATION ANTIGENS IN MAN. , 1965, Lancet.

[28]  W. Elkins INVASION AND DESTRUCTION OF HOMOLOGOUS KIDNEY BY LOCALLY INOCULATED LYMPHOID CELLS , 1964, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[29]  R. Gleason,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF BLOOD GROUPS TO SKIN GRAFT SURVIVAL IN CHICKENS , 1964, Transplantation.

[30]  G. Moller ANTIBODY-INDUCED DEPRESSION OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE: A STUDY OF THE MECHANISM IN VARIOUS IMMUNOLOGICAL SYSTEMS. , 1964, Transplantation.

[31]  W. Okazaki,et al.  HISTOCOMPATIBILITY AND ERYTHROCYTE ANTIGEN VARIABILITY WITHIN HIGHLY INBRED LINES OF WHITE LEGHORNS , 1964, Transplantation.

[32]  A. Szenberg,et al.  QUANTITATIVE ASPECTS OF THE SIMONSEN PHENOMENON. IV. EFFECT OF IMMUNISATION TO MINOR ANTIGENIC DETERMINANTS. , 1964, The Australian journal of experimental biology and medical science.

[33]  Craig Jv,et al.  Prolonged skin homograft survival and erythrocyte (B-locus) antigens in young chicks. , 1963 .

[34]  J. Craig,et al.  PROLONGED SKIN HOMOGRAFT SURVIVAL AND ERYTHROCYTE (B‐LOCUS) ANTIGENS IN YOUNG CHICKS , 1963, Transplantation.

[35]  A. Nordskog,et al.  Influence of the B Blood Group-histo-compatibility Locus in Chickens on a Graft-versus-Host Reaction , 1963, Nature.

[36]  M. Fox,et al.  AN ACQUIRED TYPE OF REFRACTORINESS TO GRAFT‐VERSUS‐HOST REACTION IN ADULT F1 HYBRID MICE , 1963, Transplantation.

[37]  E. M. Mcdermid,et al.  Blood Groups and Splenomegaly in Chick Embryos , 1962, Science.

[38]  M. Simonsen Graft versus host reactions. Their natural history, and applicability as tools of research. , 1962, Progress in allergy.

[39]  A. Szenberg,et al.  Quantitative aspects of the Simonsen phenomenon. III. The effect of immunization of the donor fowl. , 1961, The Australian journal of experimental biology and medical science.

[40]  A. Nordskog,et al.  Relationship of Blood Type to Histocompatibility in Chickens , 1961, Science.

[41]  F. Burnet,et al.  Analysis of major histocompatibility factors in a stock of closely inbred White Leghorn fowls using a graft-versus-host reaction on the chorioallantoic membrane. , 1961, The Australian journal of experimental biology and medical science.

[42]  H. Winn,et al.  DEPRESSION BY ANTIBODY OF THE IMMUNE RESPONSE TO HOMOGRAFTS AND ITS ROLE IN IMMUNOLOGICAL ENHANCEMENT , 1960, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[43]  C. Mckhann,et al.  STRENGTH OF HISTOCOMPATIBILITY GENES * , 1960 .