Environmental & economic life cycle assessment of current & future sewage sludge to energy technologies.

The UK Water Industry currently generates approximately 800GWh pa of electrical energy from sewage sludge. Traditionally energy recovery from sewage sludge features Anaerobic Digestion (AD) with biogas utilisation in combined heat and power (CHP) systems. However, the industry is evolving and a number of developments that extract more energy from sludge are either being implemented or are nearing full scale demonstration. This study compared five technology configurations: 1 - conventional AD with CHP, 2 - Thermal Hydrolysis Process (THP) AD with CHP, 3 - THP AD with bio-methane grid injection, 4 - THP AD with CHP followed by drying of digested sludge for solid fuel production, 5 - THP AD followed by drying, pyrolysis of the digested sludge and use of the both the biogas and the pyrolysis gas in a CHP. The economic and environmental Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) found that both the post AD drying options performed well but the option used to create a solid fuel to displace coal (configuration 4) was the most sustainable solution economically and environmentally, closely followed by the pyrolysis configuration (5). Application of THP improves the financial and environmental performance compared with conventional AD. Producing bio-methane for grid injection (configuration 3) is attractive financially but has the worst environmental impact of all the scenarios, suggesting that the current UK financial incentive policy for bio-methane is not driving best environmental practice. It is clear that new and improving processes and technologies are enabling significant opportunities for further energy recovery from sludge; LCA provides tools for determining the best overall options for particular situations and allows innovation resources and investment to be focused accordingly.

[1]  U. Kepp,et al.  Enhanced stabilisation of sewage sludge through thermal hydrolysis - three years of experience with full scale plant , 2000 .

[2]  P. McNamara,et al.  The effect of thermal hydrolysis pretreatment on the anaerobic degradation of nonylphenol and short-chain nonylphenol ethoxylates in digested biosolids. , 2012, Water research.

[3]  C. Chapman,et al.  The deployment of an advanced gasification technology in the treatment of household and other waste streams. , 2012 .

[4]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid. , 2010 .

[5]  Bing Zhang,et al.  Life cycle GHG emissions of sewage sludge treatment and disposal options in Tai Lake Watershed, China. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  Alexandros Kelessidis,et al.  Comparative study of the methods used for treatment and final disposal of sewage sludge in European countries. , 2012, Waste management.

[7]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies. , 2012, Waste management.

[8]  H. Vervaeren,et al.  Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane , 2011 .

[9]  Bo Zhang,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an industrial symbiosis based on energy recovery from dried sludge and used oil , 2011 .

[10]  S. Al-Athel,et al.  Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: "Our Common Future" , 1987 .

[11]  Anastasia Zabaniotou,et al.  Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods--A review , 2008 .

[12]  M. Lundin,et al.  A life cycle assessment based procedure for development of environmental sustainability indicators for urban water systems , 2002 .

[13]  Helge Brattebø,et al.  Energy consumption, costs and environmental impacts for urban water cycle services: Case study of Os , 2011 .

[14]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of small and micro combined heat and power (CHP) systems , 2011 .

[15]  Anna Björklund,et al.  ORWARE – A simulation model for organic waste handling systems. Part 1: Model description , 1997 .

[16]  J. Werther,et al.  Sewage sludge combustion , 1999 .

[17]  A. Pawłowski,et al.  Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment , 2012 .

[18]  Martina Poeschl,et al.  Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part I: Life cycle inventory for evaluation of production process emissions to air. , 2012 .

[19]  Mattias Olofsson,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of sewage sludge handling options. , 2004 .

[20]  Ray Sinnott,et al.  Costing and Project Evaluation , 2020, Chemical Engineering Design.

[21]  R. D Davis,et al.  The Impact of EU and UK Environmental Pressures on the Future of Sludge Treatment and Disposal , 1996 .

[22]  A. Bridgwater.  Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading , 2012 .

[23]  Patrick Rousseaux,et al.  An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios , 2002 .

[24]  T. Borkowski,et al.  Investigations Of Exhaust Emission Of Biogas Si Engine In Sewage Electric Generator Plant , 2008 .

[25]  Youcai Zhao,et al.  Greenhouse gases emissions accounting for typical sewage sludge digestion with energy utilization and residue land application in China. , 2013, Waste management.

[26]  Kazuyuki Inubushi,et al.  Influences of application of sewage sludge compost on N2O production in soils , 2000 .

[27]  Håkan Jönsson,et al.  ORWARE – A simulation model for organic waste handling systems. Part 2: Case study and simulation results , 1997 .

[28]  B Pickworth,et al.  Maximising biogas in anaerobic digestion by using engine waste heat for thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment of sludge. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  J. A. Menéndez,et al.  Hydrogen rich fuel gas production from the pyrolysis of wet sewage sludge at high temperature , 2006 .

[30]  J. Baeyens,et al.  Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge , 2008 .

[31]  Almudena Hospido,et al.  Should we pretreat solid waste prior to anaerobic digestion? An assessment of its environmental cost. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.