Energy efficient relay node placement in a eta-mu fading channel

In this paper we examine the effect of relay (R) placement on the energy efficiency of a wireless sensor network (WSN) operating over a n-μ fading channel. We consider n-μ statistics for modeling the small scale fading affected wireless channel between the sensor nodes. The n-μ model is quite general in nature and it encompasses other popular fading models such as Rayleigh, Nakagami etc. In order to address the demand for high data rate WSN applications, spectrally efficient M-ary quadrature amplitude modulation (MQAM) is adopted. Transmission between a pair of sensor nodes is benefitted from a third node, placed in a collinear manner (i.e. on the same straight line, joining source and destination) between source (S) and destination (D), and acting as a relay (R). The relay operates in a selective decode and forward (DF) mode. It has been seen that it is more beneficial to place the R closer to S than D. We have also investigated the effective relay placement region and how different design parameters such as constellation size (M), path loss exponent (n) and fading parameters (n and μ) affect the placement region.

[1]  Lihua Li,et al.  Energy-Efficient Relay Selection and Optimal Relay Location in Cooperative Cellular Networks with Asymmetric Traffic , 2010, ArXiv.

[2]  Aniruddha Chandra,et al.  Placing the ‘third’ node: An energy efficiency perspective , 2012, 2012 5th International Conference on Computers and Devices for Communication (CODEC).

[3]  Ammar Bouallegue,et al.  MIMO Spectral Efficiency over Energy Consumption Requirements: Application to WSNs , 2012 .

[4]  Dongweon Yoon,et al.  On the general BER expression of one- and two-dimensional amplitude modulations , 2002, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Qing Chen,et al.  Energy Efficiency Analysis in Amplify-And-Forward and Decode-And-Forward Cooperative Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE Wireless Communication and Networking Conference.

[6]  Richard Demo Souza,et al.  Energy Efficiency Analysis of Some Cooperative and Non-Cooperative Transmission Schemes in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  M.D. Yacoub,et al.  The κ-μ distribution and the η-μ distribution , 2007, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine.

[8]  José F. Paris,et al.  Outage probability analysis for η-μ fading channels , 2010, IEEE Communications Letters.

[9]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Energy-efficiency of MIMO and cooperative MIMO techniques in sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[10]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Daniel Benevides da Costa,et al.  An Outage Analysis of Multibranch Diversity Receivers with Cochannel Interference in α-μ, κ-μ, and η-μ Fading Scenarios , 2012, Wirel. Pers. Commun..