CE4: Concurrent Engineering of Product, Process, Facility, and Organization

We argue in this paper that Concurrent Engineering of Product, Process, Facility, and Organization (CE4) is now both possible and beneficial As quality has started to become a commodity, time to market has become the major issue for many kinds of businesses In some industries such as semiconductors in which product and process development have become rapid and competitive, developing the factory and bringing it on-line have started to become bottleneck steps in the product development cycle CE4 extends the tradition of concurrent engineer ing of product and manufacturing process it is now possible to start to design the product, manufacturing process, manufacturing facility, and the managing organization simultaneously Like traditional concurrent design of product and manufacturing process (CE2), CE4 probably de pends primarily on setting the management objective and providing the management support However, CE4 can build on a number of technical foundations symbolic product and process models, support for extensive coordination among design professionals doing product, process, faci lity, and organization design, and analytical tools to allow designers to do what-if studies of their individual land integrated designs Engineers now routinely use some of these analytical tools, such as simulation models of devices, processes, buildings, and facilities We suggest adding organizational analysis tools, integrating all of these tools, and using them concurrently We suggest that benefits of CE4 will include significantly improved time to market and potentially improved product cost and quality

[1]  G Augenbroe The combine project: a global assessment , 1995 .

[2]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[3]  Robert D. Logcher,et al.  DICE: An object-oriented programming environment for cooperative engineering design , 1992 .

[4]  H. Talonpoika R. Hult S. Tiainen P. and Björk B-C. Penttilä RATAS Building Product Model: Experiences with Prototypes , 1990 .

[5]  Martin Fischer,et al.  The Circle: Architecture for Integrating Software , 1995 .

[6]  Graham Winstanley,et al.  Model‐Based Planning: Scaled‐Up Construction Application , 1993 .

[7]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  OARPLAN: Generating project plans by reasoning about objects, actions and resources , 1988, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[8]  Yan Jin,et al.  The “virtual design team”: simulating how organization structure and information processing tools affect team performance , 1994 .

[9]  Ernesto M. Reza,et al.  Organizational Integration and Process Innovation , 1992 .

[10]  A. Chapman,et al.  ICADS; An intelligent computer-aided design environment , 1990 .

[11]  A FischerM,et al.  Representing project information and construction method knowledge for computer- aided construction management , 1995 .

[12]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  Behavior Follows Form Follows Function: A Theory of Design Evaluation , 1995 .

[13]  Bo-Christer Björk,et al.  A unified approach for modelling construction information , 1992 .

[14]  Richard W. Quadrel,et al.  Concurrent Computer-Integrated Building Design , 1994 .

[15]  Renate Fruchter,et al.  Collaborative Mechatronic System Design , 1996 .

[16]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  PACT: an experiment in integrating concurrent engineering systems , 1993, Computer.

[17]  Patrice Poyet,et al.  STEP software architectures for the integration of knowledge based system , 1995 .

[18]  W. Sander,et al.  Experimental phased array radar ELRA with extended flexibility , 1990 .

[19]  Scott Curland Chase,et al.  A data model for design databases , 1991 .

[20]  Walt Scacchi,et al.  Towards a Knowledge-Based System Factory: Issues and Implementations , 1986, IEEE Expert.

[21]  Thomas Froese,et al.  Integrated computer-aided project management through standard object-oriented models , 1992 .