Monitoring the high‐altitude cusp with the Low Energy Neutral Atom imager: Simultaneous observations from IMAGE and Polar

[1] The Low Energy Neutral Atom (LENA) imager on the IMAGE spacecraft in the dayside magnetosphere can detect neutral particles that are emitted in the magnetosheath flow. During a period of dynamic pressure of 4–6 nPa and interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) Bz of −5 to 3 nT on 12 April 2001, LENA on IMAGE at (XGSM, YGSM, ZGSM) ∼ (4 RE, 0 RE, 6 RE) observed significant emission in the direction of the high-latitude magnetosheath. Detailed analyses have revealed that the high-latitude sheath emission consists of two parts: the stable emission at the higher latitudes and the lower-latitude emission that occurs on and off. During the interval of this event, the Polar spacecraft was located at somewhat lower latitudes than IMAGE in similar noon meridian, and the plasma observations with the Thermal Ions Dynamic Experiment showed that the entry of the cusp ions happens in concurrence with the appearance of the lower-latitude LENA emission. This coincidence strongly suggests that the cusp ions flowing earthward charge exchange with the hydrogen exosphere. For the higher-latitude emission, its stability suggests that the source is associated with the structure persistently existing, which is consistent with the recent result showing that the sheath flow in the cusp indentation can create neutral atom emissions. Comparison of the LENA emission and ACE solar wind suggests that the lower-latitude LENA emission occurs during the southward tilting of dawnward IMF, indicating that this emission is associated with the earthward ion flux along the newly reconnected field lines. Hence this unique event for the simultaneous observations strongly suggests that LENA monitors the entry of the ions in the cusp, which is triggered by the southward tilting of the IMF, and that the significant flux of the cusp ion entry occurs equatorward of and separately from the cusp indentation.

[1]  J. Moen,et al.  Cusp/cleft auroral activity in relation to solar wind dynamic pressure, interplanetary magnetic field Bz and By , 1994 .

[2]  John W. Keller,et al.  Low energy neutral atoms in the magnetosphere , 2001 .

[3]  J. L. Green,et al.  Exterior and interior polar cusps: Observations from Hawkeye , 1997 .

[4]  Robert L. McPherron,et al.  Decay of the Dst field of geomagnetic disturbance after substorm onset and its implication to storm-substorm relation , 1996 .

[5]  T. Moore,et al.  Dayside flow bursts in the Earth's outer magnetosphere , 2004 .

[6]  S. Fuselier,et al.  Cusp aurora dependence on interplanetary magnetic field Bz , 2002 .

[7]  Nikolai Østgaard,et al.  Neutral hydrogen density profiles derived from geocoronal imaging , 2003 .

[8]  C. Meng.  Case studies of the storm time variation of the polar cusp , 1983 .

[9]  H. Rosenbauer,et al.  Plasma and Magnetic Field Characteristics of the Distant Polar Cusp near Local Noon: The Entry Layer , 1976 .

[10]  John D. Craven,et al.  Geocoronal imaging with Dynamics Explorer , 1986 .

[11]  J. Green,et al.  LENA Observations on March 31, 2001: Magnetosheath Remote Sensing , 2001 .

[12]  D. Pierce,et al.  The GGS/POLAR magnetic fields investigation , 1995 .

[13]  C. Russell,et al.  Solar wind control of the polar cusp at high altitude , 2000 .

[14]  J. Burch.  Rate of erosion of dayside magnetic flux based on a quantitative study of the dependence of polar cusp latitude on the interplanetary magnetic field , 1973 .

[15]  J. Moen,et al.  CUSP/CLEFT Auroral Activity in Relation to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure, IMF B Z and B Y , 1994 .

[16]  J. Berthelier,et al.  The Thermal Ion Dynamics Experiment and Plasma Source Instrument , 1995 .

[17]  J. A. V. Allen,et al.  Observations of the earth's polar cleft at large radial distances with the Hawkeye 1 magnetometer , 1990 .

[18]  K. Kelly,et al.  Mariner 5 measurement of the Earth's Lyman alpha emission , 1970 .

[19]  R. Wolf,et al.  Global ena Image Simulations , 2003 .

[20]  C. Farrugia,et al.  Auroral activity associated with unsteady magnetospheric erosion: Observations on December 18, 1990 , 1998 .

[21]  A. Viljanen,et al.  Geomagnetic negative sudden impulses: Interplanetary causes and polarization distribution , 2002 .

[22]  Gealy,et al.  Cross sections for electron capture and loss. I. H+ and H- impact on H and H2. , 1987, Physical review. A, General physics.

[23]  J. Slavin,et al.  Characterization of the IMF By ‐dependent field‐aligned currents in the cleft region based on DE 2 observations , 1993 .

[24]  C. Meng,et al.  Some low‐altitude cusp dependencies on the interplanetary magnetic field , 1989 .

[25]  M. Fok,et al.  Response of neutral atom emissions in the low‐latitude and high‐latitude magnetosheath direction to the magnetopause motion under extreme solar wind conditions , 2004 .

[26]  T. Moore,et al.  Heliosphere-Geosphere Interactions Using Low Energy Neutral Atom Imaging , 2003 .

[27]  M. Lester,et al.  Dayside convection and auroral morphology during an interval of northward interplanetary magnetic field , 2000 .

[28]  M. Dunlop,et al.  The high‐altitude cusps: HEOS 2 , 2000 .

[29]  S. Boardsen,et al.  Low-energy neutral atom signatures of magnetopause motion in response to southward Bz , 2005 .

[30]  Patrick T. Newell,et al.  The cusp and the cleft/boundary layer: Low‐altitude identification and statistical local time variation , 1988 .

[31]  J. Quinn,et al.  The low-energy neutral atom imager for IMAGE , 2000 .

[32]  J. Quinn,et al.  Dust in the wind: The dust geometric cross section at 1 AU based on neutral solar wind observations , 2003 .

[33]  T. Araki,et al.  Geomagnetic response to sudden expansions of the magnetosphere , 1988 .

[34]  Michael R. Collier,et al.  Observations of neutral atoms from the solar wind , 2001 .

[35]  Hideaki Kawano,et al.  Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions , 1998 .