Objective landslide detection and surface morphology mapping using high-resolution airborne laser altimetry

A map of extant slope failures is the most basic element of any landslide assessment. Without an accurate inventory of slope instability, it is not possible to analyze the controls on the spatial and temporal patterns of mass movement or the environmental, human, or geomorphic consequences of slides. Landslide inventory maps are tedious to compile, difficult to make in vegetated terrain using conventional techniques, and tend to be subjective. In addition, most landslide inventories simply outline landslide boundaries and do not offer information about landslide mechanics as manifested by internal deformation features. In an alternative approach, we constructed accurate, high-resolution DEMs from airborne laser altimetry (LIDAR) data to characterize a large landslide complex and surrounding terrain near Christchurch, New Zealand. One-dimensional, circular (2-D) and spherical (3-D) statistics are used to map the local topographic roughness in the DEMs over a spatial scale of 1.5 to 10 m. The bedrock landslide is rougher than adjacent unfailed terrain and any of the statistics can be employed to automatically detect and map the overall slide complex. Furthermore, statistics that include a measure of the local variability of aspect successfully delineate four kinematic units within the gently sloping lower half of the slide. Features with a minimum size of surface folds that have a wavelength of about 11 to 12 m and amplitude of about 1 m are readily mapped. Two adjacent earthflows within the landslide complex are distinguished by a contrast in median roughness, and texture and continuity of roughness elements. The less active of the earthflows has a surface morphology that presumably has been smoothed by surface processes. The Laplacian operator also accurately maps the kinematic units and the folds and longitudinal levees within and at the margins of the units. Finally, two-dimensional power spectra analyses are used to quantify how roughness varies with length scale. These results indicate that no dominant length scale of roughness exists for smooth, unfailed terrain. In contrast, zones with different styles of landslide deformation exhibit distinctive spectral peaks that correspond to the scale of deformation features, such as the compression folds. The topographic-based analyses described here may be used to objectively delineate landslide features, generate mechanical inferences about landslide behavior, and evaluate relatively the recent activity of slides. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

[1]  N. Moar Contributions to the quaternary history of the New Zealand flora , 1958 .

[2]  J. A. Johnston,et al.  Distribution of subfossil forest remains, eastern South Island, New Zealand , 1963 .

[3]  A. Scheidegger,et al.  An eigenvalue method for the statistical evaluation of fault plane solutions of earthquakes , 1963 .

[4]  A. Scheidegger On the statistics of the orientation of bedding planes, grain axes, and similar sedimentological data , 1965 .

[5]  G. S. Watson,et al.  The Statistics of Orientation Data , 1966, The Journal of Geology.

[6]  N. Moar Contributions to the quaternary history of the New Zealand flora: 6. Aranuian pollen diagrams from Canterbury, Nelson, and North Westland, South Island , 1971 .

[7]  Nigel Woodcock,et al.  Specification of fabric shapes using an eigenvalue method , 1977 .

[8]  R. Palmquist,et al.  Conceptual modelling of landslide distribution time and space , 1980 .

[9]  H. Kelsey A sediment budget and an analysis of geomorphic process in the Van Duzen River basin, north coastal California, 1941–1975: Summary , 1980 .

[10]  M. Selby,et al.  Hillslope materials and processes , 1982 .

[11]  G. Wieczorek,et al.  Preparing a Detailed Landslide-Inventory Map for Hazard Evaluation and Reduction , 1984 .

[12]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data. , 1987 .

[13]  C. Thorne,et al.  Quantitative analysis of land surface topography , 1987 .

[14]  R. W. Fleming,et al.  Structures associated with strike-slip faults that bound landslide elements , 1989 .

[15]  Use of longitudinal strain in identifying driving and resisting elements of landslides , 1991 .

[16]  D. Turcotte Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics , 1992 .

[17]  Nicholas I. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Circular Data , 1993 .

[18]  R. W. Fleming,et al.  Kinematics of the Aspen Grove Landslide, Ephraim Canyon, Central Utah , 1993 .

[19]  Robert S. Anderson,et al.  Evolution of the Santa Cruz Mountains, California, through tectonic growth and geomorphic decay , 1994 .

[20]  M. Abdel-Latif,et al.  Landslide hazard assessment , 1994 .

[21]  Tom Justice Engineering geological investigations of two North Canterbury landslide complexes. , 1994 .

[22]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Limits to Relief , 1995, Science.

[23]  V. Singhroy,et al.  Sar integrated techniques for geohazard assessment , 1995 .

[24]  Nicholas Brozovic,et al.  Bedrock incision, rock uplift and threshold hillslopes in the northwestern Himalayas , 1996, Nature.

[25]  Antonio Cendrero,et al.  The contribution of landslides to landscape evolution in Europe , 1996 .

[26]  Didier Massonnet,et al.  Two examples of the use of SAR interferometry on displacement fields of small spatial extent , 1996 .

[27]  Christophe Delacourt,et al.  Observation and modelling of the Saint-Étienne-de-Tinée landslide using SAR interferometry , 1996 .

[28]  F. Bénédicte,et al.  Observation and modelling of the Saint-Etienne-de-Tinée landslide using SAR interferometry , 1997 .

[29]  P. Allen,et al.  Sediment flux from a mountain belt derived by landslide mapping , 1997 .

[30]  Michael A. Ellis,et al.  Landsliding and the evolution of normal‐fault‐bounded mountains , 1998 .

[31]  V. Singhroy,et al.  Landslide characterisation in Canada using interferometric SAR and combined SAR and TM images , 1998 .

[32]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[33]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[34]  P. Aleotti,et al.  Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives , 1999 .

[35]  J. Corominas,et al.  Classic and new dating methods for assessing the temporal occurrence of mass movements , 1999 .

[36]  José Ramón Díaz de Terán,et al.  A methodological approach for the analysis of the temporal occurrence and triggering factors of landslides , 1999 .

[37]  Alexander L. Densmore,et al.  Topographic fingerprints of bedrock landslides , 2000 .

[38]  N. Trustrum,et al.  Impacts of mass movement erosion on land productivity: a review , 2000 .

[39]  Yasushi Yamaguchi,et al.  Detection of Landslide Areas Using Satellite Radar Interferometry , 2000 .

[40]  C. Wills,et al.  Comparing Landslide Inventories: The Map Depends on the Method , 2002 .

[41]  Damir Latypov,et al.  Estimating relative lidar accuracy information from overlapping flight lines , 2002 .

[42]  R. D. Hobson Surface roughness in topography: quantitative approach , 2019, Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology.