In Silico Drug Discovery: Solving the “Target‐rich and Lead‐poor” Imbalance Using the Genome‐to‐drug‐lead Paradigm

Advances in genomics, proteomics, and structural genomics have identified a large number of protein targets. Virtual screening has gained popularity in identifying drug leads by computationally screening large numbers of chemicals against experimentally determined protein targets. In that context, there continues to be a “target‐rich and lead‐poor” imbalance, reflecting an insufficiency of chemists pursuing drug discovery in academia, the challenge of engaging more chemists in this area of research, and a paucity of available protein target structures. This imbalance in manpower and structural information can be ameliorated, in part, by adapting a “genome‐to‐drug‐lead” approach, in which chemicals can be virtually screened against computer‐predicted protein targets, within the context of the US National Science Foundation's petascale computing initiative. This approach offers a solution to reduce manpower requirements for more chemists to experimentally search for drug leads, which represent one of the greatest limitations to drug discovery and better exploits the extensive availability of drug targets at the gene level, ultimately improving the success of moving discoveries from the laboratory to the patient.

[1]  M. Karplus,et al.  Locally accessible conformations of proteins: Multiple molecular dynamics simulations of crambin , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[2]  Lorna J. Smith,et al.  Assessing equilibration and convergence in biomolecular simulations , 2002, Proteins.

[3]  Jean-Charles Sanchez,et al.  Proteomics: new perspectives, new biomedical opportunities , 2000, The Lancet.

[4]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Simulation of folding of a small alpha-helical protein in atomistic detail using worldwide-distributed computing. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  From genome to drug lead: Identification of a small-molecule inhibitor of the SARS virus , 2005, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters.

[6]  A. Sali,et al.  Structural genomics: beyond the Human Genome Project , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[7]  Channa K. Hattotuwagama,et al.  Receptor-ligand binding sites and virtual screening. , 2006, Current medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Yuan-Ping Pang,et al.  EUDOC: a computer program for identification of drug interaction sites in macromolecules and drug leads from chemical databases , 2001, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  D. Mccormick Sequence the Human Genome , 1986, Bio/Technology.

[10]  Y. Pang Three‐dimensional model of a substrate‐bound SARS chymotrypsin‐like cysteine proteinase predicted by multiple molecular dynamics simulations: Catalytic efficiency regulated by substrate binding , 2004, Proteins.

[11]  Y. Liu,et al.  Only One Protomer Is Active in the Dimer of SARS 3C-like Proteinase* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  Mitchell A. Miller Chemical database techniques in drug discovery , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[13]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.

[14]  S H Kaufmann,et al.  Successful virtual screening of a chemical database for farnesyltransferase inhibitor leads. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[15]  V. Pande,et al.  Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics , 2002, Nature.

[16]  Wesley I. Sundquist,et al.  Structure of the Tsg101 UEV domain in complex with the PTAP motif of the HIV-1 p6 protein , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[17]  Y. Pang,et al.  Serotype-selective, small-molecule inhibitors of the zinc endopeptidase of botulinum neurotoxin serotype A. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[18]  P. Bradley,et al.  Toward High-Resolution de Novo Structure Prediction for Small Proteins , 2005, Science.

[19]  박홍석 [특강I]Beyond Human Genome Project , 2002 .

[20]  R. Schmid,et al.  Modeling domino effects in enzymes: molecular basis of the substrate specificity of the bacterial metallo-beta-lactamases IMP-1 and IMP-6. , 2003, Biochemistry.