Role of HAMP domains in chemotaxis signaling by bacterial chemoreceptors

Bacterial chemoreceptors undergo conformational changes in response to variations in the concentration of extracellular ligands. These changes in chemoreceptor structure initiate a series of signaling events that ultimately result in regulation of rotation of the flagellar motor. Here we have used cryo-electron tomography combined with 3D averaging to determine the in situ structure of chemoreceptor assemblies in Escherichia coli cells that have been engineered to overproduce the serine chemoreceptor Tsr. We demonstrate that chemoreceptors are organized as trimers of receptor dimers and display two distinct conformations that differ principally in arrangement of the HAMP domains within each trimer. Ligand binding and methylation alter the distribution of chemoreceptors between the two conformations, with serine binding favoring the “expanded” conformation and chemoreceptor methylation favoring the “compact” conformation. The distinct positions of chemoreceptor HAMP domains within the context of a trimeric unit are thus likely to represent important aspects of chemoreceptor structural changes relevant to chemotaxis signaling. Based on these results, we propose that the compact and expanded conformations represent the “kinase-on” and “kinase-off” states of chemoreceptor trimers, respectively.

[1]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  Direct visualization of Escherichia coli chemotaxis receptor arrays using cryo-electron microscopy , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Isolation and behavior of Escherichia coli deletion mutants lacking chemotaxis functions , 1982, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  J. Falke,et al.  Conserved glycine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of the aspartate receptor play essential roles in kinase coupling and on-off switching. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[4]  S. Chervitz,et al.  Molecular mechanism of transmembrane signaling by the aspartate receptor: a model. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J R Kremer,et al.  Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Dynamic and clustering model of bacterial chemotaxis receptors: Structural basis for signaling and high sensitivity , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  G L Hazelbauer,et al.  Transmembrane signaling in bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2001, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[8]  Hanspeter Winkler,et al.  3D reconstruction and processing of volumetric data in cryo-electron tomography. , 2007, Journal of structural biology.

[9]  S. Kim,et al.  Apo structure of the ligand‐binding domain of aspartate receptor from Escherichia coli and its comparison with ligand‐bound or pseudoligand‐bound structures , 1997, FEBS letters.

[10]  Mingshan Li,et al.  Nanodiscs separate chemoreceptor oligomeric states and reveal their signaling properties. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  H. Berg,et al.  Osmotic stress mechanically perturbs chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Sung-Hou Kim,et al.  Four-helical-bundle structure of the cytoplasmic domain of a serine chemotaxis receptor , 1999, Nature.

[13]  Andrei N. Lupas,et al.  The HAMP Domain Structure Implies Helix Rotation in Transmembrane Signaling , 2006, Cell.

[14]  G. L. Hazelbauer,et al.  Adaptational modification and ligand occupancy have opposite effects on positioning of the transmembrane signalling helix of a chemoreceptor , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[15]  Modulated receptor interactions in bacterial transmembrane signaling. , 2004, Trends in cell biology.

[16]  J. Falke,et al.  Signaling domain of the aspartate receptor is a helical hairpin with a localized kinase docking surface: cysteine and disulfide scanning studies. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[17]  Dennis Bray,et al.  Molecular model of a lattice of signalling proteins involved in bacterial chemotaxis , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[18]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  Three-Dimensional Electron Microscopic Imaging of Membrane Invaginations in Escherichia coli Overproducing the Chemotaxis Receptor Tsr , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  In vivo crosslinking methods for analyzing the assembly and architecture of chemoreceptor arrays. , 2007, Methods in enzymology.

[20]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  Three-dimensional electron microscopy at molecular resolution. , 2004, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[21]  S. Subramaniam,et al.  Electron Microscopic Analysis of Membrane Assemblies Formed by the Bacterial Chemotaxis Receptor Tsr , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  J. Falke,et al.  Detection of a Conserved α-Helix in the Kinase-docking Region of the Aspartate Receptor by Cysteine and Disulfide Scanning* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  M. Simon,et al.  Sensory transducers of E. coli are composed of discrete structural and functional domains , 1983, Cell.

[24]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[25]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Bacterial chemoreceptors: high-performance signaling in networked arrays. , 2008, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[26]  How the "melting" and "freezing" of protein molecules may be used in cell signaling. , 2008, ACS chemical biology.

[27]  F. Dahlquist,et al.  The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins of Escherichia coli. Identification of the multiple methylation sites on methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein I. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  J. Falke,et al.  Adaptation mechanism of the aspartate receptor: electrostatics of the adaptation subdomain play a key role in modulating kinase activity. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[29]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Insights into the organization and dynamics of bacterial chemoreceptor clusters through in vivo crosslinking studies , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Joanne I. Yeh,et al.  Three-dimensional structures of the ligand-binding domain of the bacterial aspartate receptor with and without a ligand. , 1995, Science.

[31]  Joanne I. Yeh,et al.  High-resolution structures of the ligand binding domain of the wild-type bacterial aspartate receptor. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  M. Homma,et al.  Control of Chemotactic Signal Gain via Modulation of a Pre-formed Receptor Array* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  H. Berg,et al.  Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Conrad C. Huang,et al.  UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[35]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  A core-weighted fitting method for docking atomic structures into low-resolution maps: application to cryo-electron microscopy. , 2003, Journal of structural biology.

[36]  W Chiu,et al.  EMAN: semiautomated software for high-resolution single-particle reconstructions. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[37]  Xiongwu Wu,et al.  Chemoreceptors in Caulobacter crescentus: Trimers of Receptor Dimers in a Partially Ordered Hexagonally Packed Array , 2008, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  J. S. Parkinson,et al.  Collaborative signaling by mixed chemoreceptor teams in Escherichia coli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.