Gender bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men

Biases against women in the workplace have been documented in a variety of studies. This paper presents the largest study to date on gender bias, where we compare acceptance rates of contributions from men versus women in an open source software community. Surprisingly, our results show that women’s contributions tend to be accepted more often than men’s. However, when a woman’s gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  What Gives a Face its Gender? , 1993, Perception.

[2]  Dirk Riehle,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration , 2009 .

[3]  Roy Rada,et al.  Interacting WITH Computers , 1989, Interact. Comput..

[4]  Michael J. Burke,et al.  Sex Discrimination in Simulated Employment Contexts: A Meta-analytic Investigation , 2000 .

[5]  M. Lévesque Perception , 1986, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[6]  Oded Nov,et al.  Gender differences in Wikipedia editing , 2011, Int. Sym. Wikis.

[7]  Claudia Gryvatz Copquin Science Communication , 2013, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[8]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[9]  J. Kmec,et al.  We (Have to) Try Harder , 2007 .

[10]  Arie van Deursen,et al.  An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model , 2014, ICSE.

[11]  André van der Hoek,et al.  Companion Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering , 2014, ICSE 2014.

[12]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Journal of Management , 2011 .

[13]  Alexander Serebrenik,et al.  Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study of StackOverflow , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics.

[14]  Massimiliano Di Penta,et al.  Proceedings of the 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories , 2013, MSR 2015.

[15]  Harvey Brooks,et al.  Science, Technology, & Human Values , 1979 .

[16]  Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick,et al.  The Matilda Effect in Science Communication , 2013 .

[17]  J. A. Adams,et al.  Psychological bulletin. , 1962, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  M. Woodhall,et al.  Economics of Education: A Review , 1987 .

[19]  Gary King,et al.  MatchIt: Nonparametric Preprocessing for Parametric Causal Inference , 2011 .

[20]  Premkumar T. Devanbu,et al.  Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams , 2015, CHI.

[21]  Audris Mockus,et al.  Predicting risk of software changes , 2000, Bell Labs Technical Journal.

[22]  John W. Graham,et al.  Gender Differences in Employment and Earnings in Science and Engineering in the US. , 2005 .

[23]  Danilo Caivano,et al.  Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement , 2018, ESEM.