A Comparative Study of Particle Size Analyses by Sieve-Hydrometer and Laser Diffraction Methods

Combined sieve-hydrometer method (SHM) is one of the two conventional methods commonly used in research and practice in all branches of science and engineering dealing with soils. SHM, however, has some inborn defects, which lead to systematical errors. The paper discusses the major causes of such errors in the analysis with examples from saprolitic soils derived from granites and volcanics. It is concluded that the deviations may be explained by three factors: differences in definitions and measurements of particle sizes; variations in densities of constituent grains; and turbulence in flow pattern of suspension. Particle size distribution (PSD) curves produced by the laser diffraction method (LDM) generally agree with those of SHM. However, some discrepancies between the results of these methods become evident upon closer inspection, and vary in extent according to the soil type and specific size fraction. For the same soil sample and a given fraction, such discrepancies can be mainly attributed to variations in density, shape, and mineralogy of particles. LDM with its many advantages over SHM should be adopted as the standard in geoengineering and geoenvironmental research, particularly involving problematic soils.

[1]  Jef Vandenberghe,et al.  Comparison of laser grain size analysis with pipette and sieve analysis: a solution for the underestimation of the clay fraction , 1997 .

[2]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  MICROTRAC PARTICLE‐SIZE ANALYZER: AN ALTERNATIVE PARTICLE‐SIZE DETERMINATION METHOD FOR SEDIMENT AND SOILS , 1984 .

[3]  T. Pape,et al.  Laser grain-size determination in soil genetic studies , 1997 .

[4]  T. Lambe.  Soil testing for engineers. , 1951 .

[5]  Jean-Luc Loizeau,et al.  Evaluation of a wide range laser diffraction grain size analyser for use with sediments , 1994 .

[6]  James P. M. Syvitski,et al.  Principles, methods, and application of particle size analysis: Principles and methods of geological particle size analysis , 1991 .

[7]  Joanne M. R. Fernlund,et al.  The effect of particle form on sieve analysis: a test by image analysis , 1998 .

[8]  Robert C. Reynolds,et al.  X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals , 1989 .

[9]  A. Persson,et al.  Image analysis of shape and size of fine aggregates , 1998 .

[10]  James P. M. Syvitski.  Principles, Methods and Application of Particle Size Analysis: The effect of grain shape and density on size measurement , 1991 .

[11]  B. Theng,et al.  Intercalation Method using Formamide for Differentiating Halloysite from Kaolinite , 1984 .

[12]  T. Pape,et al.  Laser grain-size determination in soil genetic studies. 1. practical problems. , 1997 .

[13]  L. Froyen,et al.  Grain-size analysis by laser diffractometry: comparison with the sieve-pipette method , 1998 .