Design of a robot joint with variable stiffness

A robot joint with a variable stiffness unit is presented. The variable stiffness unit (VSU) is composed of a motor, two rings that consist of arc-shaped magnets separated by spacers, and a linear guide to change the cross-sectional area of the two rings. Angular displacement between two rings causes the magnets to generate torque, which acts as a nonlinear spring. The stiffness of the joint is varied via changing the overlapping area of the magnets. The VS J exhibits nearly zero stiffness, which enables robot manipulator to be harmless to humans at a wide range of operating speed. Connected to a joint motor in series, the stiffness by the VSU and the position of the joint are controlled independently by two motors. The torque generated by the magnets is analyzed. Using dynamics of the joint, feedback linearization method is adopted to control the VSJ. In addition to feedback linearization, an integral controller is augmented in order to reduce the effect of model uncertainty and disturbances.

[1]  Michael R. Zinn,et al.  A New Actuation Approach for Human Friendly Robot Design , 2004, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  Yoshihiko Nakamura,et al.  Development of a cybernetic shoulder-a 3-DOF mechanism that imitates biological shoulder motion , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  M. Spong.  Modeling and Control of Elastic Joint Robots , 1987 .

[4]  Marcelo H. Ang,et al.  Active compliance control of a PUMA 560 robot , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[5]  J. Taylor,et al.  Playing safe? , 1989, Nursing times.

[6]  Nahum Shimkin,et al.  Nonlinear Control Systems , 2008 .

[7]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  A general algorithm for dynamic feedback linearization of robots with elastic joints , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[8]  R. Hornreich,et al.  Optimal design of synchronous torque couplers , 1978 .

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Compliant design for intrinsic safety: general issues and preliminary design , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[10]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Playing it safe [human-friendly robots] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[11]  J. Versace.  A Review of the Severity Index , 1971 .

[12]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Design and Control of a Variable Stiffness Actuator for Safe and Fast Physical Human/Robot Interaction , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Yoshihiko Nakamura,et al.  Design of programmable passive compliance shoulder mechanism , 2001, Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.01CH37164).

[14]  Shigeki Sugano,et al.  Design and development of a new robot joint using a mechanical impedance adjuster , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Alessandro De Luca.  Dynamic control of robots with joint elasticity , 1988, ICRA.

[16]  Sungchul Kang,et al.  Safe arm with MR-based passive compliant joints and visco-elastic covering for service robot applications , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[17]  Robert N. K. Loh,et al.  Passive compliance versus active compliance in robot‐based automated assembly systems , 1998 .

[18]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.