The effectiveness of delay and IDDT tests in detecting resistive open defects for nanometer CMOS adder circuits

In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of different testing schemes in detecting resistive-open defects in adder circuits implemented using different CMOS technologies (45 nm, 32 nm, 22 nm and 16 nm). We assess the detection capabilities of four testing techniques taking into consideration the wide process variations associated with the different nanometer technologies. The first three techniques are based on the transient supply current, iDDT, and the fourth technique is based on delay testing. The first iDDT method uses the RMS value of the wavelet transform of the transient power supply or ground currents. The second one uses the normalized RMS value of the wavelet transform. The third one uses the peak value of iDDT. The fourth technique measures the primary input-to-output delay. The experimental results show that the delay test is the most effective among all tests. The iDDT test with normalized RMS value of wavelet transform comes second. The other two tests were less effective than the first two, especially in the case of smaller technologies (22 and 16 nm).

[1]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Fault detection and diagnosis using wavelet based transient current analysis , 2002, Proceedings 2002 Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition.

[2]  A. Nazer,et al.  Evaluation of I/sub DDT? testing for CMOS domino circuits , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Current and Defect Based Testing, 2005. DBT 2005..

[3]  Sani R. Nassif,et al.  Modeling and analysis of manufacturing variations , 2001, Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (Cat. No.01CH37169).

[4]  Ayman I. Kayssi,et al.  Testing techniques for resistive-open defects in future CMOS technologies , 2010, 2010 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems.

[5]  Dong Sam Ha,et al.  IDDT Testing: An Efficient Method for Detecting Delay Faults and Open Defects * , 2001 .

[6]  Ali Chehab,et al.  An improved method for i/sub DDT/ testing in the presence of leakage and process variation , 2004, Proceedings. 2004 IEEE International Workshop on Current and Defect Based Testing (IEEE Cat. No.04EX1004).

[7]  Kaushik Roy,et al.  Novel sizing algorithm for yield improvement under process variation in nanometer technology , 2004, Proceedings. 41st Design Automation Conference, 2004..

[8]  Hans A. R. Manhaeve Current testing for nanotechnologies: a demystifying application perspective , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Workshop on Current and Defect Based Testing, 2005. DBT 2005..

[9]  Piero Franco Testing Digital Circuits for Timing Failures by Output Waveform Analysis , 1994 .

[10]  Víctor H. Champac,et al.  Computing the detection of Small Delay Defects caused by resistive opens of nanometer ICs , 2010, 2010 15th IEEE European Test Symposium.

[11]  Thomas M. Storey,et al.  Delay test simulation , 1977, DAC '77.

[12]  Weiping Shi,et al.  Longest-path selection for delay test under process variation , 2005, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[13]  Zhongcheng Li,et al.  IDDT Testing , 1997 .

[14]  Sani R. Nassif,et al.  Characterizing Process Variation in Nanometer CMOS , 2007, 2007 44th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.