Finite element biphasic indentation of cartilage: A comparison of experimental indenter and physiological contact geometries

Abstract In experimental cartilage indentation studies, the indenter is typically a plane-ended or hemispherically ended cylinder and can be either porous or non-porous. Joints such as the hip and knee, however, have much higher radii of curvature than those used in experimental indentation testing. In order to interpret the results from such testing in a physiological context it is therefore useful to explore the effect of contact geometry on the pore pressure and strain distribution generated in the cartilage layer. Articular cartilage can be described as a saturated porous medium, and can be considered a biphasic material consisting of a porous, permeable solid matrix, and an interstitial fluid phase. This behaviour has been predicted in this study using the ABAQUS soils consolidation procedure. Four contact geometries were modelled: two typical experimental configurations (5 mm radii cylindrical indenter and hemispherical indenters) and two effective radii representative of the hip and knee (20 and 100mm). A 10 per cent deformation, or a load of 0.9kN, was applied over a ramp time of 2 s, which was then maintained for a further 100 s. The porous indenter generated less pore pressure compared with the equivalent non-porous indenter and produced higher values of compress-ive strain in the solid matrix. The predictions made using the cylindrical indenters, porous and non-porous, were dominated by the concentrations at the edge of the indenter and overestimated the peak compressive strain in the tissue by a factor of 21 and a factor of 14 respectively when compared with the hip model. The hemispherical indenter predicted peak strains in similar positions to those predicted using physiological radii, however, the magnitude was overestimated by a factor of 2.3 when compared with the knee and by 5.7 when compared with the hip. The pore pressure throughout the cartilage layer reduced significantly as the radius of the indenter was increased.

[1]  S L Woo,et al.  A comparison of the physical behavior of normal articular cartilage and the arthroplasty surface. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression? Theory and experiments. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[3]  V C Mow,et al.  Variations in the intrinsic mechanical properties of human articular cartilage with age, degeneration, and water content. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A F Mak,et al.  The apparent viscoelastic behavior of articular cartilage--the contributions from the intrinsic matrix viscoelasticity and interstitial fluid flows. , 1986, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  T D Brown,et al.  Experimental determination of the linear biphasic constitutive coefficients of human fetal proximal femoral chondroepiphysis. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  V. Mow,et al.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--I. Theoretical analysis. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  David B. Burr,et al.  Characteristics of Joint Loading as it Applies to Osteoarthrosis , 1990 .

[8]  Robert L. Spilker,et al.  A penalty finite element analysis for nonlinear mechanics of biphasic hydrated soft tissue under large deformation , 1991 .

[9]  V C Mow,et al.  A finite element analysis of the indentation stress-relaxation response of linear biphasic articular cartilage. , 1992, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[10]  Robert L. Spilker,et al.  A hybrid finite element formulation of the linear biphasic equations for hydrated soft tissue , 1992 .

[11]  B. Simon,et al.  Multiphase Poroelastic Finite Element Models for Soft Tissue Structures , 1992 .

[12]  W M Lai,et al.  An asymptotic solution for the contact of two biphasic cartilage layers. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  R. Spilker,et al.  Indentation analysis of biphasic articular cartilage: nonlinear phenomena under finite deformation. , 1994, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  F. J. Dzida,et al.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.