A Toolkit for Ecosystem Ecologists in the Time of Big Science

Ecosystem ecologists are being challenged to address the increasingly complex problems that comprise Big Science. These problems include multiple levels of biological organization that cross multiple interacting temporal and spatial scales, from individual plants, animals, and microbes to landscapes, continents, and the globe. As technology improves, the availability of data, derived data products, and information to address these complex problems are increasing at finer and coarser scales of resolution, and legacy, dark data are brought to light. Data analytics are improving as big data increase in importance in other fields that are improving access to these data. New data sources (crowdsourcing, social media) and ease of communication and collaboration among ecosystem ecologists and other disciplines are increasingly possible via the internet. It is increasingly important that ecosystem ecologists be able to communicate their findings, and to translate their concepts and findings into concrete bits of information that a general public can understand. Traditional approaches that portray ecosystem sciences as a dichotomy between empirical research and theoretical research will keep the field from fully contributing to the complexity of global change questions, and will keep ecosystem ecologists from taking full advantage of the data and technology available. Building on previous research, we describe a more forward-looking, integrated empirical–theoretical modeling approach that is iterative with learning to take advantage of the elements of Big Science. We suggest that training ecosystem ecologists in this integrated approach will be critical to addressing complex Earth system science questions, now and in the future.

[1]  S. Hamburg,et al.  Long-Term Integrated Studies Show Complex and Surprising Effects of Climate Change in the Northern Hardwood Forest , 2012 .

[2]  D. Lindenmayer.  Merchants of Doubt. How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming , 2012 .

[3]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Local Explanations of Landscape Patterns: Can Analytical Approaches Approximate Simulation Models of Spatial Processes? , 1998, Ecosystems.

[4]  Tamzen K. Stringham,et al.  Catastrophic Thresholds: A Synthesis of Concepts, Perspectives, and Applications , 2010 .

[5]  Paul V. Manley,et al.  Spatial–Temporal Dynamics in Barrier Island Upland Vegetation: The Overlooked Coastal Landscape , 2016, Ecosystems.

[6]  Land–Sea Interactions and Consequences for Sub-Antarctic Marine Food Webs , 2015, Ecosystems.

[7]  Dale R. Lockwood,et al.  Catastrophe theory: a unified paradigm for rangeland ecosystem dynamics. , 1993 .

[8]  Olac Fuentes,et al.  Harnessing the power of big data: infusing the scientific method with machine learning to transform ecology , 2014 .

[9]  Donald Kennedy.  The committee furor and the Certainty Principle , 2003 .

[10]  S Deng,et al.  Many hands make right work , 2016 .

[11]  William K. Michener,et al.  Living in an increasingly connected world: a framework for continental-scale environmental science , 2008 .

[12]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  Taking the pulse of a continent: expanding site???based research infrastructure for regional??? to continental???scale ecology , 2014 .

[13]  M. Vanni,et al.  Animating the Carbon Cycle , 2014, Ecosystems.

[14]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Regime Shifts in the Sahara and Sahel: Interactions between Ecological and Climatic Systems in Northern Africa , 2003, Ecosystems.

[15]  Yi Yang,et al.  Citizen Science as an Approach for Overcoming Insufficient Monitoring and Inadequate Stakeholder Buy-in in Adaptive Management: Criteria and Evidence , 2015, Ecosystems.

[16]  Raphael Silberzahn,et al.  Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work , 2015, Nature.

[17]  S. Collins,et al.  Increased Light Availability Reduces the Importance of Bacterial Carbon in Headwater Stream Food Webs , 2016, Ecosystems.

[18]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Cross–Scale Interactions and Changing Pattern–Process Relationships: Consequences for System Dynamics , 2007, Ecosystems.

[19]  Craig R. Allen,et al.  Panarchy: Theory and Application , 2014, Ecosystems.

[20]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[21]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Modelling Seasonal and Inter-annual Variations in Carbon and Water Fluxes in an Arid-Zone Acacia Savanna Woodland, 1981–2012 , 2016, Ecosystems.

[22]  G. Okin,et al.  The impact of atmospheric conditions and instrument noise on atmospheric correction and spectral mixture analysis of multispectral imagery , 2015 .

[23]  Sora L. Kim,et al.  Biogeochemical Change During Climate-Driven Afforestation: A Paleoecological Perspective from the Rocky Mountains , 2016, Ecosystems.

[24]  M. Rietkerk,et al.  Self-Organized Patchiness and Catastrophic Shifts in Ecosystems , 2004, Science.

[25]  A. Townsend,et al.  Disease Ecology Meets Ecosystem Science , 2016, Ecosystems.

[26]  E. Stanley,et al.  Basin-Scale Consequences of Agricultural Land Use on Benthic Light Availability and Primary Production Along a Sixth-Order Temperate River , 2008, Ecosystems.

[27]  Debra P. C. Peters,et al.  How Can Science Be General, Yet Specific? The Conundrum of Rangeland Science in the 21st Century , 2012 .

[28]  P. Matson,et al.  Plant Communities, Soil Microorganisms, and Soil Carbon Cycling: Does Altering the World Belowground Matter to Ecosystem Functioning? , 2005, Ecosystems.

[29]  O. Sala,et al.  Beyond desertification: new paradigms for dryland landscapes , 2015 .