The USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset: A Window on Patent Processing

This article describes the “USPTO Patent Examination Research Dataset” (PatEx) and explores possible selection issues and the representativeness of the nearly 9.2 million US patent application records it contains. We find that data are sparse for years before 1981, and that serious selection issues affect records on applications filed prior to 2001 due to nonpublication in the United States. Following implementation of a policy change in November 2000, both coverage and representativeness of the PatEx data improve substantially. We uncover specific areas that are prone to selectivity issues, by generating statistical evidence across application characteristics such as application type, age, ownership type, domestic or foreign origin, patent family status, and technology class among others. Although our exploration suggests to researchers several categories of specific concern, our findings overall show that the PatEx data are generally representative of the population of patent applications filed in the United States after November 2000 across observable characteristics.

[1]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations , 2003 .

[2]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Pioneering Inventors or Thicket-Builders: Which Firms Use Continuations in Patenting? , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Crafting Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for Patent Assertion Entities, Litigation, and Innovation , 2018 .

[4]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[5]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Modelling the Duration of Patent Examination at the European Patent Office , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[6]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[7]  Xavier Jaravel,et al.  Crafting Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for Patent Assertion Entities, Litigation, and Innovation , 2018, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

[8]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  Disclosing patents' secrets , 2015, Science.

[9]  Stuart J.H. Graham,et al.  Patent Transactions in the Marketplace: Lessons from the USPTO Patent Assignment Dataset , 2015 .

[10]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[11]  Timothy Simcoe,et al.  Patent Examiner Specialization , 2017, Research Policy.

[12]  M. Gittelman,et al.  Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations , 2006, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  Talia Bar,et al.  Patent Validity Challenges and The America Invents Act , 2017 .

[14]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  What is the Probability of Receiving a U.S. Patent? , 2015 .

[15]  Heidi L. Williams,et al.  How Do Patents Affect Follow-On Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome , 2015, The American economic review.

[16]  Jesse Perla Product Awareness , Industry Life Cycles , and Aggregate Profits ∗ , 2016 .

[17]  Jay P. Kesan,et al.  Perspectives on the Growth in Chinese Patent Applications to the USPTO , 2014 .

[18]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[19]  P. Thompson,et al.  Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment , 2005 .

[20]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  The USPTO economics research agenda , 2014 .

[21]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp? , 2008 .

[22]  Deepak Hegde,et al.  What is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “Lottery” , 2017 .

[23]  J. Lerner The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis , 1994 .

[24]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  MULTINATIONAL FIRMS AND KNOWLEDGE DIFFUSION: EVIDENCE USING PATENT CITATION DATA , 2004 .

[25]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Postgrant Opposition , 2003, Innovation Policy and the Economy.

[26]  Alexander Ljungqvist,et al.  What is a Patent Worth? Evidence from the U.S. Patent “Lottery” , 2017, The Journal of Finance.

[27]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[28]  Thomas G. Wollmann,et al.  From Revolving Doors to Regulatory Capture? Evidence from Patent Examiners , 2018 .

[29]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[30]  Stuart J. H. Graham,et al.  Submarines in software? continuations in US software patenting in the 1980s and 1990s , 2004 .

[31]  Robert P. Merges,et al.  Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials , 1997 .

[32]  Mark A. Lemley,et al.  Examining Patent Examination , 2009 .