Design and Evaluation of Vertical Situation Display Reflecting Configuration Changes

Loss of control is the largest contributor to the yearly aviation death toll, with energy mismanagement in low-energy conditions as one of its main causal factors. This has led to a large emphasis from both scientific and aviation safety communities on the prevention of aircraft upset conditions. Changes in aircraft configuration largely impact performance, and improved insight therein should allow pilots to better predict potentially dangerous situations, maintain suitable safety margins and more effectively react to unforeseen events. This paper presents the design and experimental evaluation of a Vertical Situation Display (VSD) with enhancements visualizing changes in the flight performance envelope. Sixteen pilots were tasked to fly approach and go-around scenarios with both a baseline and an ecological VSD, some of the scenarios containing flight control failures. Results show that the new display makes pilots maintain larger margins in velocity, thus spending less time below the advised minimum speed limit in final approach. However, these larger velocity margins also led to larger errors with respect to target velocities. Flight control failures were more often and more quickly discovered, and pilots reported feeling better able to predict dangerous situations. No significant differences in workload were recorded. These results conclude that the new VSD design enhances safety performance, but simultaneously raise the question whether the effect of enlarged safety margins is desirable if it causes a reduction in velocity tracking.

[1]  René van Paassen,et al.  Ecological Interface Design of a Tactical Airborne Separation Assistance Tool , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[2]  Joris Field,et al.  SUPRA - Enhanced upset recovery simulation , 2012 .

[3]  Steven R. Jacobson Aircraft Loss of Control Causal Factors and Mitigation Challenges , 2010 .

[4]  Jeffery A. Schroeder,et al.  What Really Can Be Done in Simulation to Improve Upset Training , 2010 .

[5]  Max Mulder,et al.  Towards Integrating Traffic and Terrain Constraints into a Vertical Situation Display , 2010 .

[6]  J. Comans Visualizing Rules, Regulations, and Procedures in Ecological Information Systems , 2017 .

[7]  Max Mulder,et al.  Design and Simulator Evaluation of an Ecological Synthetic Vision Display , 2010 .

[8]  Max Mulder,et al.  Ecological Approach to Support Pilot Terrain Awareness After Total Engine Failure , 2007 .

[9]  Sae Nooij,et al.  Motion Simulation of Transport Aircraft in Extended Envelopes: Test Pilot Assessment , 2017 .

[10]  Richard Newman,et al.  Airplane Upsets: Old Problem, New I ssues * , 2008 .

[11]  Christine M. Belcastro,et al.  Aircraft Loss-of-Control Accident Analysis , 2010 .

[12]  Brittnee Nicholle Branham Analysis of Fatal General Aviation Accidents Occurring from Loss of Control on Approach and Landing , 2013 .

[13]  Bruce A. Conway,et al.  Analysis of General Aviation Instructional Loss of Control Accidents , 2012 .

[14]  Hafid Smaili,et al.  Pushing Ahead - SUPRA Airplane Model for Upset Recovery , 2012 .

[15]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[16]  John M. Flach,et al.  Beyond Ecological Interface Design: Lessons From Concerns and Misconceptions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.