Beltrami-net: domain-independent deep D-bar learning for absolute imaging with electrical impedance tomography (a-EIT)

Objective: To develop, and demonstrate the feasibility of, a novel image reconstruction method for absolute electrical impedance tomography (a-EIT) that pairs deep learning techniques with realtime robust D-bar methods and examine the influence of prior information on the reconstruction. Approach: A D-bar method is paired with a trained convolutional neural network (CNN) as a post-processing step. Training data is simulated for the network using no knowledge of the boundary shape by using an associated nonphysical Beltrami equation rather than simulating the traditional current and voltage data specific to a given domain. This allows the training data to be boundary shape independent. The method is tested on experimental data from two EIT systems (ACT4 and KIT4) with separate training sets of varying prior information. Main results: Post-processing the D-bar images with a CNN produces significant improvements in image quality measured by structural SIMilarity indices (SSIMs) as well as relative ℓ2 and ℓ1 image errors. Significance: This work demonstrates that more general networks can be trained without being specific about boundary shape, a key challenge in EIT image reconstruction. The work is promising for future studies involving databases of anatomical atlases.

[1]  Jonas Adler,et al.  Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[2]  Jin Keun Seo,et al.  A Learning-Based Method for Solving Ill-Posed Nonlinear Inverse Problems: A Simulation Study of Lung EIT , 2018, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[3]  Kari Astala,et al.  A boundary integral equation for Calderón's inverse conductivity problem , 2006 .

[4]  S. J. Hamilton,et al.  Deep D-Bar: Real-Time Electrical Impedance Tomography Imaging With Deep Neural Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[6]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Inverse Problems with Practical Applications , 2012, Computational science and engineering.

[7]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[8]  Jennifer L. Mueller,et al.  Effect of Domain Shape Modeling and Measurement Errors on the 2-D D-Bar Method for EIT , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Sébastien Martin,et al.  A Post-Processing Method for Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Andreas Hauptmann Approximation of full-boundary data from partial-boundary electrode measurements , 2017 .

[11]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Inverse problems with structural prior information , 1999 .

[12]  Marko Vauhkonen,et al.  Suitability of a PXI platform for an electrical impedance tomography system , 2008 .

[13]  Matti Lassas,et al.  REGULARIZED D-BAR METHOD FOR THE INVERSE CONDUCTIVITY PROBLEM , 2009 .

[14]  David Isaacson,et al.  A direct reconstruction algorithm for electrical impedance tomography , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  Numerical computation of complex geometrical optics solutions to the conductivity equation , 2010 .

[16]  Andrea Borsic,et al.  Generation of anisotropic-smoothness regularization filters for EIT , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  Nonlinear Fourier analysis for discontinuous conductivities: Computational results , 2013, J. Comput. Phys..

[18]  P.A. Karjalainen,et al.  A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[20]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low‐dose X‐ray CT reconstruction , 2016, Medical physics.

[21]  Jennifer L. Mueller,et al.  A D-Bar Algorithm with A Priori Information for 2-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2016, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[22]  S. Siltanen,et al.  Reconstructing conductivities with boundary corrected D-bar method , 2011, 1109.5982.

[23]  Thomas Pock,et al.  Learning a variational network for reconstruction of accelerated MRI data , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  A. Nachman,et al.  Global uniqueness for a two-dimensional inverse boundary value problem , 1996 .

[25]  Andreas Hauptmann,et al.  Model-Based Learning for Accelerated, Limited-View 3-D Photoacoustic Tomography , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling methods in electrical impedance tomography , 2000 .

[27]  David Isaacson,et al.  Exact solutions to a linearized inverse boundary value problem , 1990 .

[28]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[29]  Melody Dodd,et al.  A Real-time D-bar Algorithm for 2-D Electrical Impedance Tomography Data. , 2014, Inverse problems and imaging.

[30]  Jennifer L. Mueller,et al.  Dynamic optimized priors for D-bar reconstructions of human ventilation using electrical impedance tomography , 2019, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[31]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  Nachman’s reconstruction method for the Calderón problem with discontinuous conductivities , 2020, Inverse Problems.

[32]  Vivek Muthurangu,et al.  Real‐time cardiovascular MR with spatio‐temporal artifact suppression using deep learning–proof of concept in congenital heart disease , 2018, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  Ville Kolehmainen,et al.  Isotropic and anisotropic total variation regularization in electrical impedance tomography , 2017, Comput. Math. Appl..

[34]  Francesco Renna,et al.  On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of AI , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Model of Magnetic Anisotropy of Non-Oriented Steel Sheets for Finite-Element Method , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[36]  Kari Astala,et al.  Calderon's inverse conductivity problem in the plane , 2006 .

[37]  Michael Unser,et al.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Corrigendum to "Incorporating structural prior information and sparsity into EIT using parallel level sets" , 2019, Inverse Problems & Imaging.

[39]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[40]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning , 2017, Nature.

[41]  Stephan Antholzer,et al.  Deep learning for photoacoustic tomography from sparse data , 2017, Inverse problems in science and engineering.

[42]  S. Siltanen,et al.  Nachman's reconstruction for the Calderon problem with discontinuous conductivities. , 2018, 1809.09272.

[43]  Sebastien Martin,et al.  Nonlinear Electrical Impedance Tomography Reconstruction Using Artificial Neural Networks and Particle Swarm Optimization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[44]  S J Hamilton,et al.  Robust computation in 2D absolute EIT (a-EIT) using D-bar methods with the ‘exp’ approximation , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[45]  Nuutti Hyvönen,et al.  Approximating idealized boundary data of electric impedance tomography by electrode measurements , 2009 .

[46]  Ning Liu ACT4: A high-precision, multi-frequency electrical impedance tomograph , 2007 .

[47]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Deep Convolutional Framelets: A General Deep Learning Framework for Inverse Problems , 2017, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[48]  David Isaacson,et al.  Reconstructions of chest phantoms by the D-bar method for electrical impedance tomography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[49]  Seong Jong Hong,et al.  A feasibility study of an integrated NIR/gamma/visible imaging system for endoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping , 2017, Medical physics.