Development and application of the SSD approach in scientific case studies for ecological risk assessment

Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) are used in ecological risk assessment for extrapolation of the results of toxicity tests with single species to a toxicity threshold considered protective of ecosystem structure and functioning. The attention to and importance of the SSD approach has increased in scientific and regulatory communities since the 1990s. Discussion and criticism have been triggered on the concept of the approach as well as its technical aspects (e.g., distribution type, number of toxicity endpoints). Various questions remain unanswered, especially with regard to different endpoints, statistical methods, and protectiveness of threshold levels, for example. In the present literature review (covering the period 2002-2013), case studies are explored in which the SSD approach was applied, as well as how endpoint types, species choice, and data availability affect SSDs. How statistical methods may be used to construct reliable SSDs and whether the lower 5th percentile hazard concentrations (HC5s) from a generic SSD can be protective for a specific local community are also investigated. It is shown that estimated protective concentrations were determined by taxonomic groups rather than the statistical method used to construct the distribution. Based on comparisons between semifield and laboratory-based SSDs, the output from a laboratory SSD was protective of semifield communities in the majority of studies. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:2149-2161. © 2016 SETAC.

[1]  Ling Chen A conservative, nonparametric estimator for the 5th percentile of the species sensitivity distributions , 2004 .

[2]  Mace G Barron,et al.  Determinants of variability in acute to chronic toxicity ratios for aquatic invertebrates and fish , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[3]  Hong Chang,et al.  Predicting water quality criteria for protecting aquatic life from physicochemical properties of metals or metalloids. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  J R Wheeler,et al.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[5]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Predicting and observing responses of algal communities to photosystem ii‐herbicide exposure using pollution‐induced community tolerance and species‐sensitivity distributions , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[6]  Nobuhisa Kashiwagi,et al.  A Bayesian approach to probabilistic ecological risk assessment: risk comparison of nine toxic substances in Tokyo surface waters , 2011, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[7]  P. Chapman,et al.  Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments of Inorganic Metals and Metalloids: Current Status , 2003 .

[8]  R. Brain,et al.  Toxicity and hazard of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline to algae. , 2007, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[9]  C. Staples,et al.  A Weight of Evidence Analysis of the Chronic Ecotoxicity of Nonylphenol Ethoxylates, Nonylphenol Ether Carboxylates, and Nonylphenol , 2004 .

[10]  D. Knapen,et al.  Discrepancies in the acute versus chronic toxicity of compounds with a designated narcotic mechanism. , 2012, Chemosphere.

[11]  Lorraine Maltby,et al.  Fungicide risk assessment for aquatic ecosystems: importance of interspecific variation, toxic mode of action, and exposure regime. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  S. Dyer,et al.  Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Mark Crane,et al.  Freshwater to saltwater toxicity extrapolation using species sensitivity distributions , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[14]  J. Römbke,et al.  Effects of pesticides on soil invertebrates in model ecosystem and field studies: A review and comparison with laboratory toxicity data , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[15]  P. J. Van den Brink,et al.  Effects of malathion and carbendazim on Amazonian freshwater organisms: comparison of tropical and temperate species sensitivity distributions , 2011, Ecotoxicology.

[16]  P. Calow,et al.  Extrapolation in Ecological Risk Assessment: Balancing Pragmatism and Precaution in Chemical Controls Legislation , 2002 .

[17]  P. Mineau,et al.  Estimation of chemical toxicity to wildlife species using interspecies correlation models. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  L. Maltby,et al.  Predictive Value of Species Sensitivity Distributions for Effects of Herbicides in Freshwater Ecosystems , 2006 .

[19]  G. Hose Assessing the Need for Groundwater Quality Guidelines for Pesticides Using the Species Sensitivity Distribution Approach , 2005 .

[20]  T. Jager Bad habits die hard: The NOEC's persistence reflects poorly on ecotoxicology , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[21]  I. Roessink,et al.  The species sensitivity distribution approach compared to a microcosm study: a case study with the fungicide fluazinam. , 2010, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[22]  L. Schiesari,et al.  Biogeographic Biases in Research and Their Consequences for Linking Amphibian Declines to Pollution , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  M. Kamo,et al.  Assessing ecological risk of zinc in Japan using organism- and population-level species sensitivity distributions. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[24]  P. Bayliss,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment of Tebuthiuron Following Application on Tropical Australian Wetlands , 2004 .

[25]  M. Barron,et al.  Evaluation of in silico development of aquatic toxicity species sensitivity distributions. , 2012, Aquatic toxicology.

[26]  P. Ciffroy,et al.  Acute‐to‐chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[27]  G. Hose,et al.  Confirming the Species-Sensitivity Distribution Concept for Endosulfan Using Laboratory, Mesocosm, and Field Data , 2004, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[28]  D. Knapen,et al.  Assessment of aquatic experimental versus predicted and extrapolated chronic toxicity data of four structural analogues. , 2012, Chemosphere.

[29]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Global assessment of the effects of terrestrial acidification on plant species richness. , 2013, Environmental pollution.

[30]  J. Römbke,et al.  Effects of pesticides on soil invertebrates in laboratory studies: A review and analysis using species sensitivity distributions , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[31]  Mark A. J. Huijbregts,et al.  Pesticide ecotoxicological effect factors and their uncertainties for freshwater ecosystems , 2009 .

[32]  Mark Crane,et al.  Evaluation of probabilistic risk assessment of pesticides in the UK: chlorpyrifos use on top fruit. , 2003, Pest management science.

[33]  T. Traas,et al.  Ecotoxicological environmental risk limits for total petroleum hydrocarbons on the basis of internal lipid concentrations , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[34]  Michael St. J. Warne,et al.  NOEC and LOEC Data Should No Longer Be Generated or Used , 2008 .

[35]  D. de Zwart,et al.  Predicted effects of toxicant mixtures are confirmed by changes in fish species assemblages in Ohio, USA, rivers , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[36]  J. F. Carriger,et al.  Endosulfan and its metabolite, endosulfan sulfate, in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida: a probabilistic aquatic ecological risk assessment , 2010, Ecotoxicology.

[37]  Nico M. van Straalen Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc. , 2002 .

[38]  Merlin Keller,et al.  Estimating hazardous concentrations by an informative Bayesian approach. , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[39]  Igor G. Dubus,et al.  Using the expert model PERPEST to translate measured and predicted pesticide exposure data into ecological risks , 2006 .

[40]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Differences in sensitivity of native and exotic fish species to changes in river temperature , 2011 .

[41]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Sensitivity of species to chemicals: dose-response characteristics for various test types (LC(50), LR(50) and LD(50)) and modes of action. , 2013, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[42]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Sensitivity of native and non-native mollusc species to changing river water temperature and salinity , 2012, Biological Invasions.

[43]  Deborah N. Vivian,et al.  Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[44]  Jacqueline E Tamis,et al.  Development and application of a species sensitivity distribution for temperature‐induced mortality in the aquatic environment , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[45]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  A critique of the use of distribution-based extrapolation models in ecotoxicology , 1993 .

[46]  Peter M Chapman,et al.  Well past time to stop using NOELs and LOELs , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[47]  C. Palmer,et al.  Relative salinity tolerance of freshwater macroinvertebrates from the south-east Eastern Cape, South Africa compared with the Barwon Catchment, Victoria, Australia , 2005 .

[48]  D. Nugegoda,et al.  Validating species sensitivity distributions using salinity tolerance of riverine macroinvertebrates in the southern Murray–Darling Basin (Victoria, Australia) , 2006 .

[49]  Matthias Liess,et al.  Relative sensitivity distribution of aquatic invertebrates to organic and metal compounds , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[50]  Quanxi Shao,et al.  Estimation for hazardous concentrations based on NOEC toxicity data: an alternative approach , 2000 .

[51]  Peter Calow,et al.  The extrapolation problem and how population modeling can help , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[52]  P. J. Van den Brink,et al.  Effect of Parathion-Methyl on Amazonian Fish and Freshwater Invertebrates: A Comparison of Sensitivity with Temperate Data , 2009, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[53]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  Species sensitivity distributions for suspended clays, sediment burial, and grain size change in the marine environment , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[54]  I. Roessink,et al.  Impact of triphenyltin acetate in microcosms simulating floodplain lakes. II. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions between laboratory and semi-field , 2006, Ecotoxicology.

[55]  S. Ormerod,et al.  Estimating safe concentrations of trace metals from inter-continental field data on river macroinvertebrates. , 2012, Environmental pollution.

[56]  M. Lam,et al.  Toxicities of antifouling biocide Irgarol 1051 and its major degraded product to marine primary producers. , 2008, Marine pollution bulletin.

[57]  A. Hendriks How to deal with 100,000+ substances, sites, and species: overarching principles in environmental risk assessment. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[58]  Lorraine Maltby,et al.  Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: Importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[59]  Species Sensitivity Distribution Estimation from Uncertain (QSAR-based) Effects Data , 2013, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[60]  Fuliu Xu,et al.  Spatio-temporal distributions and the ecological and health risks of phthalate esters (PAEs) in the surface water of a large, shallow Chinese lake. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[61]  P. Farrell,et al.  Comprehensive study of tests for normality and symmetry: extending the Spiegelhalter test , 2006 .

[62]  Variation in the level of protection afforded to birds and crustaceans exposed to different pesticides under standard risk assessment procedures , 2011, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[63]  P. Craig,et al.  Making species salinity sensitivity distributions reflective of naturally occurring communities: Using rapid testing and Bayesian statistics , 2008, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[64]  Mark Crane,et al.  What level of effect is a no observed effect? , 2000 .

[65]  L. Posthuma,et al.  Effects of Zinc Contamination on a Natural Nematode Community in Outdoor Soil Mesocosms , 2002, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[66]  Mark Crane,et al.  Chronic toxicity of tributyltin to development and reproduction of the European freshwater snail Lymnaea stagnalis (L.). , 2007, Chemosphere.

[67]  Patti L TenBrook,et al.  Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria. , 2009, Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[68]  S. Raimondo,et al.  Standardizing acute toxicity data for use in ecotoxicology models: influence of test type, life stage, and concentration reporting , 2009, Ecotoxicology.

[69]  P. Ciffroy,et al.  Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[70]  D. de Zwart,et al.  Predicted mixture toxic pressure relates to observed fraction of benthic macrofauna species impacted by contaminant mixtures , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[71]  P. Krogh,et al.  European risk assessment of LAS in agricultural soil revisited: species sensitivity distribution and risk estimates. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[72]  R. Leuven,et al.  Low oxygen tolerance of different life stages of temperate freshwater fish species. , 2013, Journal of fish biology.

[73]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Sensitivity of polar and temperate marine organisms to oil components. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[74]  M. Liess,et al.  Variability of pesticide exposure in a stream mesocosm system: macrophyte-dominated vs. non-vegetated sections. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[75]  T. Baussant,et al.  Relating biomarkers to whole‐organism effects using species sensitivity distributions: A pilot study for marine species exposed to oil , 2009, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[76]  D. Zwart Impact of toxicants on species composition of aquatic communities : concordance of predictions and field , 2005 .

[77]  P. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Do we have to incorporate ecological interactions in the sensitivity assessment of ecosystems? An examination of a theoretical assumption underlying species sensitivity distribution models. , 2008, Environment international.

[78]  Junko Nakanishi,et al.  Risk assessment of short-chain chlorinated paraffins in Japan based on the first market basket study and species sensitivity distributions. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[79]  S. Dyer,et al.  Derivation of freshwater quality criteria for zinc using interspecies correlation estimation models to protect aquatic life in China. , 2013, Chemosphere.

[80]  C. Wong,et al.  Relative Sensitivity Distribution of Freshwater Planktonic Crustaceans to Trace Metals , 2009 .

[81]  G. Suter,et al.  Ecological Risk Assessment of Diffuse and Local Soil Contamination Using Species Sensitivity Distributions , 2011 .

[82]  N. J. Ouborg,et al.  Ecotoxicogenomics: bridging the gap between genes and populations. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[83]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  Acute to chronic ratios in aquatic toxicity—variation across trophic levels and relationship with chemical structure , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[84]  Dayanthi Nugegoda,et al.  Relative salinity tolerance of macroinvertebrates from the Barwon River, Victoria, Australia , 2003 .

[85]  Donald J Baird,et al.  Using biological traits to predict species sensitivity to toxic substances. , 2007, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[86]  Carl-Magnus Larsson,et al.  An overview of the ERICA Integrated Approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants. , 2008, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[87]  C. Palmer,et al.  Risk assessment using the species sensitivity distribution method: Data quality versus data quantity , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[88]  T Aldenberg,et al.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. , 2000, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[89]  T. Brock,et al.  Effects of the pyrethroid insecticide gamma-cyhalothrin on aquatic invertebrates in laboratory and outdoor microcosm tests , 2009, Ecotoxicology.

[90]  J. Sumpter,et al.  Derivation of an aquatic predicted no-effect concentration for the synthetic hormone, 17 alpha-ethinyl estradiol. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[91]  Colin R. Janssen,et al.  Relevance of generic and site‐specific species sensitivity distributions in the current risk assessment procedures for copper and zinc , 2005, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[92]  Nelly van der Hoeven,et al.  Current issues in statistics and models for ecotoxicological risk assessment. , 2004 .

[93]  Graeme L. Hickey,et al.  Global Scale Variation in the Salinity Sensitivity of Riverine Macroinvertebrates: Eastern Australia, France, Israel and South Africa , 2012, PloS one.

[94]  Peter A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of zinc in dutch surface waters , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[95]  Takehiko I. Hayashi,et al.  A Bayesian Method for Deriving Species-Sensitivity Distributions: Selecting the Best-Fit Tolerance Distributions of Taxonomic Groups , 2010 .

[96]  P. Calow,et al.  Ecological risk assessment: risk for what? How do we decide? , 1998, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[97]  R. Schulz,et al.  Temporal variability in particle-associated pesticide exposure in a temporarily open estuary, Western Cape, South Africa. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[98]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian and time-independent species sensitivity distributions for risk assessment of chemicals. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[99]  A. Breure,et al.  Ranking ecological risks of multiple chemical stressors on amphibians , 2012, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[100]  S. Dyer,et al.  Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[101]  S. Raimondo,et al.  Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[102]  David R Fox,et al.  Time‐dependent species sensitivity distributions , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[103]  M. Ellersieck,et al.  Acute Toxicity Value Extrapolation with Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates , 2005, Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[104]  Bin Wang,et al.  Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC5 of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[105]  I. Roessink,et al.  THE NEONICOTINOID IMIDACLOPRID SHOWS HIGH CHRONIC TOXICITY TO MAYFLY NYMPHS , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[106]  Mark Crane,et al.  Better bootstrap estimation of hazardous concentration thresholds for aquatic assemblages , 2002, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[107]  R. Roijackers,et al.  Comparing aquatic risk assessment methods for the photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides metribuzin and metamitron. , 2004, Environmental pollution.

[108]  M. Smit,et al.  Arctic versus temperate comparison of risk assessment metrics for 2-methyl-naphthalene. , 2011, Marine environmental research.

[109]  M. Crane,et al.  COMPARATIVE ACUTE AND CHRONIC SENSITIVITY OF FISH AND AMPHIBIANS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF DATA , 2013, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[110]  Scott E. Belanger,et al.  Understanding single‐species and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data‐based comparison , 1999 .

[111]  R. Nisbet,et al.  Indirect effects of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems. , 2003, The Science of the total environment.

[112]  Ad M J Ragas,et al.  Do interspecies correlation estimations increase the reliability of toxicity estimates for wildlife? , 2012, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[113]  S. Raimondo,et al.  Influence of taxonomic relatedness and chemical mode of action in acute interspecies estimation models for aquatic species. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[114]  V. Forbes,et al.  Comparing sensitivity of ecotoxicological effect endpoints between laboratory and field. , 2002, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[115]  M. Vijver,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation of watertype-specific no-effect concentrations and risks of Cu, Ni, and Zn. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[116]  David W Pennington,et al.  Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets. , 2003, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[117]  Valery E. Forbes,et al.  Species Sensitivity Distributions Revisited: A Critical Appraisal , 2002 .