Digital Inequality and Place: The Effects of Technological Diffusion on Internet Proficiency and Usage across Rural, Suburban, and Urban Counties

Recently researchers have made efforts to reconceptualize digital inequality into discrete levels. These levels reflect access to and diffusion of technologies, proficiency in Internet usage, and propensity to take advantage of the opportunities afforded by information and communication technologies for assistance in daily life. We assess the utility of this approach for studying digital inequality across rural, suburban, and urban counties. Based on data from a 2005 nationally representative random sample telephone survey of 2,185 adults, the results provide mixed support for using this approach to studying digital inequality. In particular, we find that rural residents use Internet technologies less for assistance in helping with economics and other daily activities when compared with individuals from suburban and urban areas; however, our results suggest that this relationship is the product of the slow diffusion of advanced technologies to rural areas. The implications of these findings for understanding this under-theorized form of inequality are discussed, and we make contributions to this literature through empirically addressing issues of digital capital.

[1]  C. Haythornthwaite.  Introduction , 2001 .

[2]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  The Internet, 1995-2000 , 2001, ArXiv.

[3]  R. Rice,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2002 .

[4]  Murat Sayili,et al.  Challenge of rural people to reduce digital divide in the globalized world: Theory and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Second-Level Digital Divide: Differences in People's Online Skills , 2002, First Monday.

[6]  B. Wellman,et al.  The Internet in everyday life , 2002 .

[7]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  Open portals or closed gates? Channeling Content on the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[8]  T. Grubesic.  Inequities in the broadband revolution , 2003 .

[9]  Bruce Bimber.  Measuring the Gender Gap on the Internet 1 , 2000 .

[10]  Brian E. Whitacre.  Factors influencing the temporal diffusion of broadband adoption: evidence from Oklahoma , 2008 .

[11]  Eszter Hargittai,et al.  The Social, Political, Economic, and Cultural Dimensions of Search Engines: An Introduction , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[12]  Bradford F. Mills,et al.  Infrastructure and the Rural—urban Divide in High-speed Residential Internet Access , 2007 .

[13]  D. Dillman,et al.  Community Participation, Social Ties, and Use of the Internet , 2006 .

[14]  Kermit C. Whaley,et al.  America's Digital Divide: 2000–2003 Trends , 2004, Journal of Medical Systems.

[15]  John P. Robinson,et al.  NEW SOCIAL SURVEY PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2003 .

[16]  B. Wellman,et al.  THE GLOBAL DIGITAL DIVIDE - WITHIN AND BETWEEN COUNTRIES , 2004 .

[17]  Joseph D. Straubhaar,et al.  Closing the rural broadband gap: Promoting adoption of the Internet in rural America , 2007 .

[18]  Craig Martin,et al.  Digital information access in urban/suburban communities: A survey report of public digital library use by the residents in Connecticut , 2006, OCLC Syst. Serv..