A Fuzzy TOPSIS Model to Rank Automotive Suppliers

This paper highlights the most significant criteria and sub-criteria in automotive industries for selecting the best supplier from the previous paper. Supplier selection process is one of the key activities of management in a supply chain environment. This paper presents another methodology to select the most suitable supplier in a supply chain system using Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). Triangular Fuzzy set is applied into the proposed model to handle the vagueness. The interdependencies between criteria are considered. In our FTOPSIS model, the results show that FTOPSIS is remarkably successful in determining the best supplier with stability in the ranking as it relates to the different criteria weights and multiple sub-criteria. The proposed methodology presents a comprehensive multi-criteria approach to find the best ranking among the alternative suppliers. The result shows that supplier A is the best supplier with the Closeness Coefficient of 0.5407. The FTOPSIS model proposed can be apply on other vague multiple criteria decision making problem since it shows good result in the research. Future research may expand the work to another field of study or in a different type of industry.

[1]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[2]  Amy H. I. Lee,et al.  An evaluation framework for product planning using FANP, QFD and multi-choice goal programming , 2010 .

[3]  Du Wen,et al.  A Fuzzy TOPSIS based Approach for Distributor Selection in Supply Chain Management: An Empirical Study of an Agricultural Enterprise in China , 2014 .

[4]  Amir Azizi,et al.  Comparative Study of AHP and ANP on Multi-Automotive Suppliers with Multi-Criteria , 2014 .

[5]  Pema Wangchen Bhutia,et al.  Appication of ahp and topsis method for supplier selection problem , 2012 .

[6]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  Remko I. van Hoek,et al.  Epilogue ‐ Moving forward with agility , 2001 .

[8]  Xinli Wang Supplier Selection and Evaluation Based on Grey Correlation Degree and TOPSIS , 2014 .

[9]  M. Christopher,et al.  An Integrated Model for the Design of Agile Supply Chains. , 2001 .

[10]  William J. Tolone Virtual situation rooms: connecting people across enterprises for supply-chain agility , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[11]  Jay Bal,et al.  Virtual Teaming in the Agile Supply Chain , 1999 .

[12]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy set theory , 1992 .

[13]  R. Warburton,et al.  The strategic integration of agile and lean supply , 2003 .

[14]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  The three dimensions of responsiveness , 2005 .

[15]  Michael J. Braunscheidel Antecedents of supply chain agility: An empirical investigation , 2005 .

[16]  Nagesh N. Murthy,et al.  The antecedents of supply chain agility of a firm: Scale development and model testing , 2006 .

[17]  A. Sohal,et al.  Critical success factors in agile supply chain management ‐ An empirical study , 2001 .

[18]  Emad Roghanian,et al.  An application of fuzzy TOPSIS to improve the process of supply chain management in the food industries: A case study of protein products manufacturing company , 2014 .

[19]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy Systems Engineering - Toward Human-Centric Computing , 2007 .

[20]  Intaher Marcus Ambe,et al.  AGILE SUPPLY CHAIN: STRATEGY FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2010 .

[21]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .