The Material Properties of Human Tibia Cortical Bone in Tension and Compression: Implications for the Tibia Index

The risk of sustaining tibia fractures as a result of a frontal crash is commonly assessed by applying measurements taken from anthropometric test devices to the Tibia Index. The Tibia Index is an injury tolerance criterion for combined bending and axial loading experienced at the midshaft of the leg. However, the failure properties of human tibia compact bone have only been determined under static loading. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop the tensile and compressive material properties for human tibia cortical bone coupons when subjected to three loading rates: static, quasistatic, and dynamic. This study presents machined cortical bone coupon tests from 6 loading configurations using four male fresh frozen human tibias. A servo-hydraulic Material Testing System (MTS) was used to apply tension and compression loads to failure at approximately 0.05 s⁻¹, 0.5 s⁻¹, and 5.0 s⁻¹ to cortical bone coupons oriented along the long axis of the tibia. Although minor, axial tension specimens showed a decrease in the failure strain and an increase the modulus with increasing strain rate. There were no significant trends found for axial compression samples, with respect to the modulus or failure strain. Although the results showed that the average failure stress increased with increasing loading rate for axial tension and compression, the differences were not found to be significant. The average failure stress for the static, quasi-static, and dynamic tests were 150.6 MPa, 159.8 MPa, and 192.3 MPa for axial tension specimens and 177.2 MPa, 208.9 MPa, and 214.1 MPa for axial compression specimens. When the results of the current study are considered in conjunction with the previous work the average compressive strength to tensile strength ratio was found to range from 1.08 to 1.36.

[1]  M. H. Pope,et al.  The response of compact bone in tension at various strain rates , 1974, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Rodney W Rudd,et al.  The Effect of Tibial Curvature and Fibular Loading on the Tibia Index , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[3]  D. R. Miller,et al.  Variations of tensile strength of human cortical bone with age. , 1966, Clinical science.

[4]  A. Burstein,et al.  The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  M Martens,et al.  Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  E. Sedlin,et al.  A rheologic model for cortical bone. A study of the physical properties of human femoral samples. , 1965, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[7]  I. Stockley,et al.  Biochemical properties of cortical allograft bone using a new method of bone strength measurement. A comparison of fresh, fresh-frozen and irradiated bone. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  I. Stockley,et al.  BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF CORTICAL ALLOGRAFT BONE USING A NEW METHOD OF BONE STRENGTH MEASUREMENT , 1996 .

[9]  James H. McElhaney,et al.  Dynamic response of biological materials. , 1965 .

[10]  J. Bechtold,et al.  Biomechanical properties of canine corticocancellous bone frozen in normal saline solution. , 1995, American journal of veterinary research.

[11]  F. Linde,et al.  The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  E R Welbourne,et al.  IMPROVED MEASURES OF FOOT AND ANKLE INJURY RISK FROM THE HYBRID III TIBIA , 1998 .

[13]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Differences and relationships between the physical properties and the microscopic structure of human femoral, tibial and fibular cortical bone , 1967 .

[14]  Joel D Stitzel,et al.  Material properties of human rib cortical bone from dynamic tension coupon testing. , 2005, Stapp car crash journal.

[15]  A H Burstein,et al.  The ultimate properties of bone tissue: the effects of yielding. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  J. K. Weaver The microscopic hardness of bone. , 1966, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  Rolf H. Eppinger,et al.  LOWER EXTREMITY INJURIES AND ASSOCIATED INJURY CRITERIA , 2001 .

[18]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Relations of the compressive properties of human cortical bone to histological structure and calcification. , 1974, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  Melick Ra,et al.  Variations of tensile strength of human cortical bone with age. , 1966 .

[21]  Yuehuei H. An,et al.  Mechanical testing of bone and the bone-implant interface , 1999 .

[22]  Pete Thomas,et al.  Lower Limb Injuries - The Effect of Intrusion, Crash Severity and the Pedals on Injury Risk and Injury Type in Frontal Collisions , 1995 .

[23]  F. G. Evans,et al.  Strength of biological materials , 1970 .

[24]  J. L. Wood,et al.  Dynamic response of human cranial bone. , 1971, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  P C Dischinger,et al.  Lower extremity injuries in drivers of airbag-equipped automobiles: clinical and crash reconstruction correlations. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[26]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  Compact bone as a non-isotropic material. , 1952, The American journal of anatomy.

[27]  W. T. Dempster,et al.  Tensile strength of bone along and across the grain. , 1961, Journal of applied physiology.

[28]  V. Frankel The femoral neck : function fracture mechanism, internal fixation : an experimental study , 1960 .