Autonomous guidance and navigation based on the COLREGs rules and regulations of collision avoidance.

”Automatic steering is a most valuable invention if properly used. It can lead to disaster when it is left to look after itself while vigilance is relaxed. It is on men that safety at sea depends and they cannot make a greater mistake than to suppose ...” The statement was made by the Justice Cairns with respect to a collision that had occurred due to the fault in the automatic pilot system when the British cargo ship ”Trentbank” was overtaking the Portu-guese tanker ”Fogo”’ in the Mediterranean in Sep-tember 1964 (Cockcroft and Lameijer (2001)). The verdict not just shows the importance of the AGN systems in ocean navigations but also of the human vigilance of its capabilities and requirements for fur-ther developments. The automatic pilot systems are primary level de-velopments units of the Autonomous Guidance and Navigation (AGN) Systems and their applications have been in the dreams of ship designers in several decades. The development of computer technology, satellite communication systems, and electronic de-vices, including high-tech sensors and actuators, have turned these dreams into a possible reality when designing the next generation ocean AGN sys-tems. The initial step of the AGN system, which made the foundation for applied control engineering, was formulated around 1860 to 1930 with the invention of the first automatic ship steering mechanism by Sperry (1922). Sperry’s work was based on replica-tion of the actions of an experienced helmsman that was formulated as a single input single output sys-tem (SISO). Similarly, the research work done by Minorski (1922) is also regarded as the key contribution to the development of AGN Systems. His initial work was based on the theoretical analysis of automated ship steering system with respect to a second order ship dynamic model. The experiments were carried out by Minorski on New Mexico in cooperation with the US Navy in 1923 and reported in 1930 (Bennett, 1984). Hence both works done by Sperry and by Minor-ski are considered as the replication of non-linear behavior of an experienced helmsman (Roberts et al. (2003)) in ocean navigation. From Sperry’s time to present, much research has been done and consider-able amount of literature has been published on AGN systems with respect to the areas of marine vessel dynamics, navigation path generations, and controller applications, environmental disturbance rejections and collision avoidance conditions. The functionalities of the Multipurpose Guidance, Navigation and Control (GNC) systems are summa-rized by Fossen (1999) on a paper that focuses not only on course-keeping and course-changing maneu-vers (Conventional auto pilot system) but also inte-gration of digital data (Digital charts and weather data), dynamic position and automated docking sys-tems.

[1]  S. Sivanandam,et al.  Introduction to Fuzzy Logic using MATLAB , 2006 .

[2]  J. Garibaldi,et al.  Modelling the variation in human decision making , 2004, IEEE Annual Meeting of the Fuzzy Information, 2004. Processing NAFIPS '04..

[3]  Xiao-ming Zeng,et al.  Building an automatic control system of maneuvering ship in collision situation with genetic algorithms , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[4]  Yu-Hong Liu,et al.  Case Learning Base on Evaluation System for Vessel Collision Avoidance , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[5]  M.R. Benjamin,et al.  COLREGS-based navigation of autonomous marine vehicles , 2004, 2004 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37578).

[6]  Zbigniew Pietrzykowski,et al.  The Ship Domain : A Criterion of Navigational Safety Assessment in an Open Sea Area , 2009 .

[7]  S. Bennett,et al.  Nicholas Minorsky and the automatic steering of ships , 1984, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[8]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Causal factors in accidents of high-speed craft and conventional ocean-going vessels , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  N. Minorsky.,et al.  DIRECTIONAL STABILITY OF AUTOMATICALLY STEERED BODIES , 2009 .

[10]  Hiromitsu Ishii,et al.  Study of a collision-avoidance system for ships , 1998 .

[11]  Robert Sutton,et al.  Intelligent ship autopilots––A historical perspective , 2003 .

[12]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Fuzzy Systems Engineering - Toward Human-Centric Computing , 2007 .

[13]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Mathematical models for ship path prediction in manoeuvring simulation systems , 2002 .

[14]  Shenhua Yang,et al.  Study on Construction of Simulation Platform for Vessel Automatic Anti-collision and Its Test Method , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Automation and Logistics.

[15]  Zbigniew Michalewicz,et al.  Modeling of ship trajectory in collision situations by an evolutionary algorithm , 2000, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[16]  Klaus D. McDonald-Maier,et al.  Autonomous Ship Collision Avoidance Navigation Concepts, Technologies and Techniques , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[17]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Dynamic model of manoeuvrability using recursive neural networks , 2003 .

[18]  Byung Suk Lee,et al.  Automatic collision avoidance of ships , 2009 .

[19]  Masanori Ito,et al.  Collision avoidance control of ship with genetic algorithm , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.99CH36328).

[20]  Józef Lisowski,et al.  Neural network classifier for ship domain assessment , 2000 .

[21]  Frans Coenen,et al.  Developing an intelligent marine navigation system , 1990 .

[22]  Jonathan M. Garibaldi,et al.  Preliminary Investigations into Modelling the Variation in Human Decision Making , 2004 .

[23]  X. Cheng,et al.  Trajectory Optimization for Ship Collision Avoidance System Using Genetic Algorithm , 2006, OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific.

[24]  Ahmad Ibrahim,et al.  Fuzzy Logic for Embedded Systems Applications , 2003 .

[25]  K. Ohtsu.  Recent development on analysis and control of ship's motions , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.99CH36328).

[26]  Joongseon Joh,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic for Autonomous Navigation of Marine Vehicles Satisfying COLREG Guidelines , 2004 .

[27]  K. H. Kwik.  Calculation of ship collision avoidance manoeuvres: A simplified approach , 1989 .

[28]  John J. Leonard,et al.  Navigation of unmanned marine vehicles in accordance with the rules of the road , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..

[29]  Chris J. Harris,et al.  Autonomous ship collision free trajectory navigation and control algorithms , 1999, 1999 7th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings ETFA '99 (Cat. No.99TH8467).

[30]  Christine Chauvin,et al.  Decision making and strategies in an interaction situation: Collision avoidance at sea , 2008 .

[31]  Khac Duc Do,et al.  Robust path-following of underactuated ships : Theory and experiments on a model ship , 2006 .

[32]  Y. Yavin,et al.  Computation of feasible command strategies for the navigation of a ship in a narrow zigzag channel , 1995 .

[33]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Path following control system for a tanker ship model , 2007 .

[34]  A. J. Healey,et al.  Multivariable sliding mode control for autonomous diving and steering of unmanned underwater vehicles , 1993 .

[35]  H. Rommelfanger.  Multicriteria decision making using fuzzy logic , 1998, 1998 Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society - NAFIPS (Cat. No.98TH8353).

[36]  Terry L. Hardy.  Multi-objective decision-making under uncertainty: Fuzzy logic methods , 1994 .