Discrimination of insect wingbeat-frequencies by the batRhinolophus ferrumequinum

SummaryFive Greater Horseshoe bats,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, were trained in a two-alternative forced-choice procedure to discriminate between artificial echoes of insects fluttering at different wingbeat rates. The stimuli were electronically produced phantom targets simulating fluttering insects with various wingbeat frequencies (Figs. 3, 4). Difference thresholds for wingbeat rates of 50 Hz and 100 Hz were determined. For an S+ of 50 Hz the difference threshold values lay between 2.8 and 4.6 Hz for individual bats; with an S+ of 100 Hz they increased to between 9.8 and 12.0 Hz (Figs. 5, 6, Table 1).Three bats, previously trained to discriminate between a S+ of 50 Hz and a S− with a lower wingbeat rate, were tested with higher frequency stimuli. When they had to decide between their old S+ of 50 Hz and either a 60 or 70 Hz echo two bats continued to select the 50 Hz stimulus while the third bat now preferred the faster fluttering insects (Table 2).During the discrimination task the echolocation behavior of the bats was monitored. When the phantom targets were presented all bats increased their duty-cycle of sound emission from about 40% to sometimes near 70%. They did so by either emitting longer echolocation calls or by increasing the sound repetition rate (Figs. 7, 8).The results show that Greater Horseshoe bats can determine the wingbeat rate of flying insects with an accuracy between 6 and 12%. Possible cues for flutter rate determination by cf-fm bats from natural and artificial insect echoes are discussed.

[1]  The Functional Organisation of the Auditory Cortex in the CF — FM Bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 1980 .

[2]  Olavi Sotavalta,et al.  The flight-tone (wing-stroke frequency) of insects (Contributions to the problem of insect flight 1.) , 1947 .

[3]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Target Discrimination and Target Classification in Echolocating Bats , 1988 .

[4]  H. Schnitzler Comparison of the echolocation behavior in Rhinolophus ferrum-equinum and Chilonycteris rubiginosa , 1970 .

[5]  Louis W. Gellermann Chance Orders of Alternating Stimuli in Visual Discrimination Experiments , 1933 .

[6]  L. J. Goldman,et al.  Prey recognition and selection by the constant frequency bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Tonotopic organization and encoding features of single units in inferior colliculus of horseshoe bats: functional implications for prey identification. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Echolocation, Insect Hearing, and Feeding Ecology of Insectivorous Bats , 1982 .

[9]  Y. W. Sum,et al.  Discrimination of fluttering targets by the FM-batPipistrellus stenopterus? , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  Echoortung bei Rhinolophus ferrumequinum mit frequenzmodulierten Lauten. Evoked Potentials im Colliculus inferior , 1972 .

[11]  Echolocation behavior of rufous horseshoe bats hunting for insects in the flycatcher-style , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  The Acoustical Image of Fluttering Insects in Echolocating Bats , 1983 .

[13]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Performance of Airborne Animal Sonar Systems: I. Microchiroptera , 1980 .

[14]  Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Adaptations for the Detection of Fluttering Insects by Echolocation in Horseshoe Bats , 1983 .

[15]  S. Bedrosian,et al.  Normalized Design of 90° Phase-Difference Networks , 1960 .

[16]  Gerhard Neuweiler,et al.  Echolocation and Adaptivity to Ecological Constraints , 1983 .

[17]  Hans -Ulrich Schnitzler,et al.  Detection of oscillating target movements by echolocation in the Greater Horseshoe bat , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[18]  G. Schuller Coding of small sinusoidal frequency and amplitude modulations in the inferior colliculus of ‘CF-FM’ bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  R. Johnson,et al.  Detection of insect wing beats by the bat, Pteronotus parnellii , 1974 .

[20]  M. Brock Fenton,et al.  The use of Doppler-shifted echoes as a flutter detection and clutter rejection system: the echolocation and feeding behavior of Hipposideros ruber (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae) , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  Doppler-shift compensation in insect-catching horseshoe bats , 1982, Naturwissenschaften.