Substructure damage identification based on wavelet-domain response reconstruction

This article presents experimental verification on damage identification of a substructure using a wavelet-domain response reconstruction technique. The response reconstruction is based on the unit impulse response function in the wavelet domain to form a transformation matrix between two different sets of time-domain response vectors. The initial finite element model updating is performed to achieve an accurate model in the intact stage as a baseline, and measured acceleration responses from the damaged substructure are used for the damage identification. Substructure damage identification is conducted by minimizing the discrepancy between a measured response vector and the reconstructed one. A dynamic response sensitivity-based model updating method is used for the identification of the target substructure. Local damage is identified as a change in the elemental stiffness factors. The adaptive Tikhonov regularization technique is adopted to improve the identification results with measured responses including measurement and environmental noises in laboratory. Experimental studies on a 7-storey plane frame structure are conducted to investigate the accuracy of the presented response reconstruction technique and the performance of substructure damage identification approach. Good response reconstruction accuracy is obtained with the baseline model, and the introduced damages in the substructure can be identified effectively. The damage locations are identified correctly with a close estimation of damage extents.

[1]  C. Koh,et al.  Substructural Identification Method without Interface Measurement , 2003 .

[2]  Chan Ghee Koh,et al.  Substructural and progressive structural identification methods , 2003 .

[3]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. [control systems design for large space structures] , 1985 .

[4]  Hong Hao,et al.  Civil structure condition assessment by FE model updating: methodology and case studies , 2001 .

[5]  Gregory W. Reich,et al.  Structural system identification: from reality to models , 2003 .

[6]  S. S. Law,et al.  DAMAGE LOCALIZATION BY DIRECTLY USING INCOMPLETE MODE SHAPES. TECHNICAL NOTE , 2000 .

[7]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods , 1998 .

[8]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[9]  Gangbing Song,et al.  Experimental Damage Identification of Carbon/Epoxy Composite Beams Using Curvature Mode Shapes , 2004 .

[10]  Yl L. Xu,et al.  Damage detection of mono-coupled periodic structures based on sensitivity analysis of modal parameters , 2005 .

[11]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[12]  X. Y. Li,et al.  Wavelet-Based Sensitivity Analysis of the Impulse Response Function for Damage Detection , 2007 .

[13]  S. S. Law,et al.  Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection , 2007 .

[14]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Substructural identification for damage estimation of structures , 1997 .

[15]  Jann N. Yang,et al.  Damage identification of substructure for local healthmonitoring , 2008 .

[16]  S. T. Quek,et al.  Substructuralrst- and second-order model identication for structural damage assessment , 2005 .

[17]  Chung Bang Yun,et al.  Substructural identification using neural networks , 2000 .

[18]  Jun Li,et al.  Substructural Damage Detection With Incomplete Information of the Structure , 2012 .

[19]  A. K. Pandey,et al.  Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility , 1994 .

[20]  K. Park,et al.  Extraction of Impulse Response Data via Wavelet Transform for Structural System Identification , 1998 .

[21]  L. M. See,et al.  Estimation of structural parameters in time domain: A substructure approach , 1991 .

[22]  Robert D. Adams,et al.  The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies , 1979 .

[23]  D. C. Zimmerman,et al.  Model correlation and system health monitoring using frequency domain measurements , 1995 .

[24]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[25]  S. S. Law,et al.  Substructure methods for structural condition assessment , 2011 .

[26]  G. De Roeck,et al.  Damage detection in bridges using modal curvatures: application to a real damage scenario , 1999 .

[27]  S. S. Law,et al.  Identification of system parameters and input force from output only , 2007 .

[28]  Jun Li,et al.  Substructural Response Reconstruction in Wavelet Domain , 2011 .

[29]  Paul Reynolds,et al.  Finite element modelling and updating of a lively footbridge: The complete process , 2007 .

[30]  R. J. Peppin An Introduction to Random Vibrations, Spectral and Wavelet Analysis , 1994 .

[31]  You-Lin Xu,et al.  Inverse substructure method for model updating of structures , 2012 .

[32]  Chan Ghee Koh,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Studies of a Substructural Identification Strategy , 2009 .

[33]  E. Peter Carden,et al.  Vibration Based Condition Monitoring: A Review , 2004 .

[34]  X. Y. Li,et al.  Adaptive Tikhonov regularization for damage detection based on nonlinear model updating , 2010 .

[35]  K. Morton,et al.  Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Introduction , 2005 .

[36]  Jun Li,et al.  Structural response reconstruction with transmissibility concept in frequency domain , 2011 .

[37]  Hong Hao,et al.  Substructuring Technique for Damage Detection Using Statistical Multi-Stage Artificial Neural Network , 2010 .