A quasi-integral controller for adaptation of genetic modules to variable ribosome demand

The behavior of genetic circuits is often poorly predictable. A gene’s expression level is not only determined by the intended regulators, but also affected by changes in ribosome availability imparted by expression of other genes. Here we design a quasi-integral biomolecular feedback controller that enables the expression level of any gene of interest (GOI) to adapt to changes in available ribosomes. The feedback is implemented through a synthetic small RNA (sRNA) that silences the GOI’s mRNA, and uses orthogonal extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor to sense the GOI’s translation and to actuate sRNA transcription. Without the controller, the expression level of the GOI is reduced by 50% when a resource competitor is activated. With the controller, by contrast, gene expression level is practically unaffected by the competitor. This feedback controller allows adaptation of genetic modules to variable ribosome demand and thus aids modular construction of complicated circuits.Competition for shared cellular resources often renders genetic circuits poorly predictable. Here the authors design a biomolecular quasi-integral controller that allows gene expression to adapt to variable demand in translation resources.

[1]  M. Sørensen,et al.  Synthesis of proteins in Escherichia coli is limited by the concentration of free ribosomes. Expression from reporter genes does not always reflect functional mRNA levels. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[3]  L Stoneham,et al.  Expanding the frontiers. , 2000, Texas medicine.

[4]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[5]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  U. Alon,et al.  Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  P. Swain,et al.  Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Khammash,et al.  Calcium homeostasis and parturient hypocalcemia: an integral feedback perspective. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  S. Gottesman,et al.  A small RNA regulates the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism in Escherichia coli , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  S. Gottesman,et al.  Coupled degradation of a small regulatory RNA and its mRNA targets in Escherichia coli. , 2003, Genes & development.

[11]  E. Sonnleitner,et al.  Functional effects of variants of the RNA chaperone Hfq. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[12]  Konstantinos Michalodimitrakis,et al.  Noise in transcription negative feedback loops: simulation and experimental analysis , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[13]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Genetic regulation of fluxes: iron homeostasis of Escherichia coli , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  G. Friedlander,et al.  Regulation of gene expression by small non-coding RNAs: a quantitative view , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  T. Hwa,et al.  Quantitative Characteristics of Gene Regulation by Small RNA , 2007, PLoS Biology.

[16]  H. Aiba Mechanism of RNA silencing by Hfq-binding small RNAs. , 2007, Current opinion in microbiology.

[17]  B. Görke,et al.  Feedback control of glucosamine‐6‐phosphate synthase GlmS expression depends on the small RNA GlmZ and involves the novel protein YhbJ in Escherichia coli , 2007, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Efficient degradation and expression prioritization with small RNAs , 2006, Physical biology.

[19]  S. Gottesman,et al.  σE Regulates and Is Regulated by a Small RNA in Escherichia coli , 2007 .

[20]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2007 .

[21]  B. Bassler,et al.  A negative feedback loop involving small RNAs accelerates Vibrio cholerae's transition out of quorum-sensing mode. , 2008, Genes & development.

[22]  N. Wingreen,et al.  A quantitative comparison of sRNA-based and protein-based gene regulation , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[23]  J. Vogel,et al.  Noncoding RNA control of the making and breaking of sugars. , 2008, Genes & development.

[24]  D. G. Gibson,et al.  Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases , 2009, Nature Methods.

[25]  H. Kwakernaak,et al.  Feedback Systems , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[26]  G. Balázsi,et al.  Negative autoregulation linearizes the dose–response and suppresses the heterogeneity of gene expression , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  J. Chin,et al.  Synthesis of orthogonal transcription-translation networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Automated Design of Synthetic Ribosome Binding Sites to Precisely Control Protein Expression , 2009, Nature Biotechnology.

[29]  Priscilla E. M. Purnick,et al.  The second wave of synthetic biology: from modules to systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[30]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Negative feedback loops involving small regulatory RNAs precisely control the Vibrio harveyi quorum-sensing response. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[31]  J. Kittleson,et al.  Rapid optimization of gene dosage in E. coli using DIAL strains , 2011, Journal of biological engineering.

[32]  G. Storz,et al.  Regulation by small RNAs in bacteria: expanding frontiers. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[33]  G. Stephanopoulos,et al.  Novel reference genes for quantifying transcriptional responses of Escherichia coli to protein overexpression by quantitative PCR , 2011, BMC Molecular Biology.

[34]  A. Arkin,et al.  Contextualizing context for synthetic biology – identifying causes of failure of synthetic biological systems , 2012, Biotechnology journal.

[35]  Gabriel C. Wu,et al.  Successes and failures in modular genetic engineering. , 2012, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.

[36]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Design of orthogonal genetic switches based on a crosstalk map of σs, anti-σs, and promoters , 2013, Molecular Systems Biology.

[37]  Vivek K. Mutalik,et al.  Composability of regulatory sequences controlling transcription and translation in Escherichia coli , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Jordan Ang,et al.  Physical constraints on biological integral control design for homeostasis and sensory adaptation. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[39]  M. G. Cusella De Angelis,et al.  Half-life measurements of chemical inducers for recombinant gene expression , 2014, Journal of Biological Engineering.

[40]  R. Murray,et al.  Gene circuit performance characterization and resource usage in a cell-free "breadboard". , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[41]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Mitigation of resource competition in synthetic genetic circuits through feedback regulation , 2014, 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[42]  Deepak Mishra,et al.  A load driver device for engineering modularity in biological networks , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Design and Implementation of a Biomolecular Concentration Tracker , 2014, ACS synthetic biology.

[44]  G. Stan,et al.  Quantifying cellular capacity identifies gene expression designs with reduced burden , 2015, Nature Methods.

[45]  Phillip M. Rivera,et al.  Synthetic tunable amplifying buffer circuit in E. coli. , 2015, ACS synthetic biology.

[46]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Isocost Lines Describe the Cellular Economy of Genetic Circuits , 2015, Biophysical journal.

[47]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Modularity, context-dependence, and insulation in engineered biological circuits , 2015 .

[48]  C. Rodríguez-Caso,et al.  Dealing with the genetic load in bacterial synthetic biology circuits: convergences with the Ohm's law , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[49]  M. Khammash,et al.  Antithetic Integral Feedback Ensures Robust Perfect Adaptation in Noisy Biomolecular Networks. , 2016, Cell systems.

[50]  Ankit Gupta,et al.  Antithetic Integral Feedback Ensures Robust Perfect Adaptation in Noisy Biomolecular Networks. , 2014, Cell systems.

[51]  James E Ferrell,et al.  Perfect and Near-Perfect Adaptation in Cell Signaling. , 2016, Cell systems.

[52]  Christopher J Petzold,et al.  Programming mRNA decay to modulate synthetic circuit resource allocation , 2016, Nature Communications.

[53]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Resource Competition Shapes the Response of Genetic Circuits. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[54]  Susanna Zucca,et al.  Re-using biological devices: a model-aided analysis of interconnected transcriptional cascades designed from the bottom-up , 2017, Journal of biological engineering.

[55]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Balancing gene expression without library construction via a reusable sRNA pool , 2017, Nucleic acids research.

[56]  Yinjie J. Tang,et al.  Decoupling Resource-Coupled Gene Expression in Living Cells. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[57]  Mustafa Khammash,et al.  A synthetic integral feedback controller for robust tunable regulation in bacteria , 2017, bioRxiv.

[58]  Thomas P. Prescott,et al.  A Synthetic Recombinase-Based Feedback Loop Results in Robust Expression. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[59]  Domitilla Del Vecchio,et al.  Realizing “integral control” in living cells: How to overcome leaky integration due to dilution? , 2017, bioRxiv.

[60]  Y. Benenson,et al.  Synthetic control systems for high performance gene expression in mammalian cells , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[61]  Ankit Gupta,et al.  Antithetic proportional-integral feedback for reduced variance and improved control performance of stochastic reaction networks , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[62]  G. Stan,et al.  Burden-driven feedback control of gene expression , 2017, Nature Methods.

[63]  Xun Tang,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of RNA-Based Architectures for Closed Loop Control of Gene Expression. , 2018, ACS synthetic biology.

[64]  Yoke Peng Leong,et al.  Hard Limits and Performance Tradeoffs in a Class of Sequestration Feedback Systems , 2017, bioRxiv.

[65]  Declan G. Bates,et al.  Dynamic allocation of orthogonal ribosomes facilitates uncoupling of co-expressed genes , 2017, Nature Communications.

[66]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Engineered promoters enable constant gene expression at any copy number in bacteria , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[67]  Andreas W. K. Harris,et al.  Synthetic negative feedback circuits using engineered small RNAs , 2017, bioRxiv.