Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia--a six-year experience.

PURPOSE The Authors present their results using laparoscopic prostatectomy in the treatment of large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). MATERIALS AND METHODS Between March 1999 and March 2005, 60 patients were submitted to laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for large BPH. The demographic, operative period and outcome data were recorded. RESULTS The average prostate weight was 144.50+/-41.74 gm. Mean operative time was 138.48+/-23.38 minutes and estimated blood loss of 330.98+/-149.52 ml. No patient required transfusions or conversion to open surgery. Post operative complications included one case of septicemia and three cases of prolonged ileum. The most frequent long-term complication was retrograde ejaculation, presented in all patients after 6 months of follow-up. The erectile function was preserved in all those patients who were potent before surgery. No urinary incontinence was reported by patients. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate that resection of large prostatic adenomas can be performed with a laparoscopic approach. The patients had a shorter hospital stay and early return to normal activity.

[1]  X. Cathelineau,et al.  Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challenge. , 2004, The Journal of urology.

[2]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Laparoscopic retropubic simple prostatectomy. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[3]  S. Ahyai,et al.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate compared with transvesical open prostatectomy: 18-month follow-up of a randomized trial. , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[4]  T. Graziottin,et al.  Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[5]  D. Soderdahl,et al.  Erectile dysfunction following transurethral resection of the prostate. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[6]  L. Salomon,et al.  Assessment of penile small nerve fiber damage after transurethral resection of the prostate by measurement of penile thermal sensation. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[7]  D. Yarnitsky,et al.  Penile thermal sensation. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[8]  B. Chughtai,et al.  Extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy (adenomectomy) for obstructing benign prostatic hyperplasia: transvesical and transcapsular (Millin) techniques. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[9]  J. Rassweiler,et al.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[10]  C. Iselin,et al.  Capsular perforation localization and adenoma size as prognostic indicators of erectile dysfunctional after transurethral prostatectomy. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[11]  F. Recker,et al.  Incidence of erectile impotence secondary to transurethral resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia, assessed by preoperative and postoperative Snap Gauge tests. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[12]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Improved hemostasis during simple retropubic prostatectomy. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[13]  M. P. Laguna,et al.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal adenomectomy (Millin): pilot study on feasibility. , 2003, European urology.

[14]  R. Nadler,et al.  Preperitoneal laparoscopic simple prostatectomy. , 2004, Urology.

[15]  D. Hanbury,et al.  Erectile function following transurethral prostatectomy. , 1995, British journal of urology.