Accuracy of a Rapid Diagnostic Test for the Presence of Direct Oral Factor Xa or Thrombin Inhibitors in Urine—A Multicenter Trial

The rapid determination of the presence of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in a patient remains a major challenge in emergency medicine and for rapid medical treatment decisions. All DOACs are excreted into urine. A sensitive and specific point-of-care test has been developed to determine whether they are present in patient urine samples. This prospective multicenter study aimed to demonstrate at least 95% correct positive and negative predictive results for factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors in urine samples using DOAC Dipstick pads compared with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (NCT03182829). Nine hundred and fourteen subjects were included and 880 were evaluated per protocol (factor Xa inhibitors apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban: n = 451, thrombin inhibitor dabigatran: n = 429) at 18 centers. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and predictive values and agreement between methods for determination of factor Xa inhibitors were at least noninferior to 95% with a 0.5% margin and of thrombin inhibitor superior to 97.5%. These results were compared with LC-MS/MS results in the intention-to-analyze cohort (all p < 0.05). The receiver operating curve showed c-values of 0.989 (factor Xa inhibitors) and 0.995 (thrombin inhibitor). Visual evaluation of the factor Xa and thrombin inhibitor pads was not different between centers. Qualitative determination of both types of DOACs was accurate using the DOAC Dipstick compared with using LC-MS/MS. The high predictive values may impact laboratory and clinical decision-making processes.

[1]  J. Douketis,et al.  An assay to measure levels of factor Xa inhibitors in blood and plasma , 2019, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[2]  E. Tatar,et al.  Purple urine: an astonishing symptom in an elderly patient with acute kidney injury , 2019, Internal medicine journal.

[3]  M. Crowther,et al.  Reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: Guidance from the Anticoagulation Forum , 2019, American journal of hematology.

[4]  J. Leitgeb,et al.  Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in adult patients with traumatic brain injury receiving oral anticoagulant therapy: an Austrian interdisciplinary consensus statement , 2019, Critical Care.

[5]  S. Hetjens,et al.  Detecting Anti-IIa and Anti-Xa Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Agents in Urine using a DOAC Dipstick , 2018, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

[6]  F. Dentali,et al.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients. , 2018, Blood advances.

[7]  A. Rupp,et al.  Limitations of Specific Coagulation Tests for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Critical Analysis , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[8]  A. Dicko,et al.  Efficacy and safety of primaquine and methylene blue for prevention of Plasmodium falciparum transmission in Mali: a phase 2, single-blind, randomised controlled trial , 2018, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[9]  C. Samama,et al.  Management of bleeding and emergency invasive procedures in patients on dabigatran: Updated guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) - September 2016. , 2018, Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.

[10]  A. Camm,et al.  The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2018, European heart journal.

[11]  S. Kitchen,et al.  International Council for Standardization in Haematology (ICSH) Recommendations for Laboratory Measurement of Direct Oral Anticoagulants , 2018, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[12]  H. ten Cate,et al.  Practical guidance on the use of laboratory testing in the management of bleeding in patients receiving direct oral anticoagulants , 2017, Vascular health and risk management.

[13]  J. Douxfils,et al.  Laboratory Assessment of Direct Oral Anticoagulants , 2017, Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

[14]  N. Ferreirós,et al.  Microfluidic coagulation assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy in acute stroke patients , 2017, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[15]  A. Tripodi To measure or not to measure direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures: reply , 2016, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[16]  J. Douketis,et al.  To measure or not to measure direct oral anticoagulants before surgery or invasive procedures: comment , 2016, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[17]  W. Ageno,et al.  When and how to use antidotes for the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH , 2016, Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH.

[18]  C. Weiss,et al.  Patients' Serum and Urine as Easily Accessible Samples for the Measurement of Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants , 2015, Seminars in Thrombosis & Hemostasis.

[19]  C. Weiss,et al.  Concept of a point of care test to detect new oral anticoagulants in urine samples , 2013, Thrombosis Journal.

[20]  G G Koch,et al.  Some general methods for the analysis of categorical data in longitudinal studies. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.