Size-dependent behavior of tuna in an array of fish aggregating devices (FADs)

Several lines of evidence indicate that aggregations of yellowfin tuna associated with floating objects are more frequently composed of small animals than larger ones. Also, the diet of small yellowfin tuna caught at anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs) around Oahu, Hawaii, was found to shift quite rapidly when these fish reached approximately 50 cm FL. In order to test for ontogenetic changes in aggregation behavior, we tagged and released two distinct size classes of yellowfin tuna in an array of anchored FADs around Oahu, Hawaii. Twenty-four yellowfin tuna 30–39 cm FL and 16 yellowfin tuna 63–83 cm FL were tagged with acoustic transmitters and released near anchored FADs equipped with automated acoustic receivers. Fish in the smaller size class stayed about 2.5 times longer at individual FADs than the larger fish (mean 4.05 days vs. 1.65 days) and displayed larger horizontal movements within the array. However, the durations of unassociated phases, residence times in the entire FAD array, percentage of time spent associated with FADs and numbers of movements between FADs did not show any difference between the two size groups. The observed size-dependent behavior is discussed in terms of physiological abilities, diet segregation and anti-predator behavior.

[1]  Mar Ecol,et al.  Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species , 2008 .

[2]  I. Ohta,et al.  Periodic behavior and residence time of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices around Okinawa Islands, as identified with automated listening stations , 2005 .

[3]  D. Gaertner,et al.  Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species , 2008 .

[4]  A. Klimley,et al.  School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares , 1999 .

[5]  David Itano,et al.  Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs) , 2007 .

[6]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .

[7]  Frédéric Ménard,et al.  Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries: an ecological trap? , 2000 .

[8]  Barbara A. Block,et al.  Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry: implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes , 1999 .

[9]  Kurt M. Schaefer,et al.  Vertical movements, behavior, and habitat of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean, ascertained from archival tag data , 2010 .

[10]  P. Cayré,et al.  Behaviour of yellowfin ( Thunnus albacares ) and skipjack tuna ( Katsuwonus pelamis ) around FADs as determined by sonic tagging , 1991 .

[11]  Kim N. Holland,et al.  A rapid ontogenetic shift in the diet of juvenile yellowfin tuna from Hawaii , 2006 .

[12]  John Hampton,et al.  Natural mortality rates in tropical tunas: size really does matter , 2000 .

[13]  Pierre Fréon,et al.  Review of fish associative behaviour: Toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis , 2000, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[14]  T. Pitcher.  Functions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts , 1986 .

[15]  Javier Ariz,et al.  Observed changes in the species composition of tuna schools in the Gulf of Guinea between 1981 and 1999, in relation with the Fish Aggregating Device fishery , 2000 .

[16]  K. Holland,et al.  HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL MOVEMENTS OF YELLOWFIN AND BIGEYE TUNA ASSOCIATED WITH FISH AGGREGATING DEVICES , 1990 .

[17]  J. Castro,et al.  A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: An alternative to the meeting point hypothesis , 2002, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[18]  L. Dagorn,et al.  Individual differences in horizontal movements of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in nearshore areas in French Polynesia, determined using ultrasonic telemetry , 2000 .

[19]  F. Marsac,et al.  Modelling the yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) vertical distribution using sonic tagging results and local environmental parameters , 1993 .

[20]  Frédéric Ménard,et al.  Do drifting and anchored Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) similarly influence tuna feeding habits? A case study from the western Indian Ocean , 2011 .

[21]  K. Anraku,et al.  Association of early juvenile yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares with a network of payaos in the Philippines , 2011, Fisheries Science.

[22]  Jean-Yves Le Gall,et al.  Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poissons , 1999 .

[23]  Simon Benhamou,et al.  FAD: Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  D. Gaertner,et al.  Exploitation of small tunas by a purse-seine fishery with fish aggregating devices and their feeding ecology in an eastern tropical Atlantic ecosystem , 2000 .