The Economics of Security Externalities Assessing, Managing and Benefiting from Global Interdependent Risks

With the increasing globalization of economic and social activities, the world has now become so interdependent that actions taken today 5,000 miles away could affect you tomorrow. Conventional wisdom holds that one country or one organization has the capacity and expertise to manage future large-scale risks alone. However, in an increasingly global interdependent world, they have neither. A hallmark of the 21 century is that we have entered a new era of catastrophic risks, as illustrated by the evolution of economic and insured losses associated with a series of global events that occurred in just the past few years. The increase in insured losses from man-made (including terrorism) and natural disasters worldwide over the past 36 years (see Figure 1) graphically depicts the new era we have entered. From Table 1 we see that the 9/11 terrorist attacks inflicted $35 billion in insured losses. Claims were paid by over 150 insurers and reinsurers worldwide, illustrating how risks are today diversified over global markets. Four major hurricanes hit one of the most populated states in the U.S. (Florida) in 2004, and three major hurricanes hit the Gulf of Mexico the following year. The devastation due to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 has been unprecedented both in terms of human and economic losses. It is the most costly catastrophe in the history of insurance worldwide ($45.5 billion in insured losses) as shown in Table 1. Of the twenty most costly insured catastrophes that occurred in the world over the past 36 years (1970-2006), half of them occurred since 2001.

[1]  Philip E. Auerswald,et al.  Seeds of Disaster, Roots of Response: How Private Action Can Reduce Public Vulnerability , 2006 .

[2]  DISASTERS AND PUBLIC POLICY: CAN MARKET LESSONS HELP ADDRESS GOVERNMENT FAILURES?* , 2007 .

[3]  P. Gordon,et al.  The Economic Impacts of Terrorist Attacks , 2007 .

[4]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Seeds of Disaster, Roots of Response: Interdependent Security in Interconnected Networks , 2006 .

[5]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  You Can Only Die Once: Interdependent Security in an Uncertain World , 2005 .

[6]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Ecology of Terror Defense , 2003 .

[7]  R F Mould Chernobyl Record: The Definitive History of the Chernobyl Catastrophe , 2000 .

[8]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Decision processes for low probability events: Policy implications , 1989 .

[9]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  JARring Actions that Fuel the Floods , 2006 .

[10]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Modeling Interdependent Risks , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Time Insensitivity for Protective Investments , 1998 .

[12]  Charles Meade,et al.  Considering the Effects of a Catastrophic Terrorist Attack , 2006 .

[13]  Yossi Sheffi,et al.  The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage , 2005 .

[14]  R. Thaler Mental accounting matters , 1999 .

[15]  T. Schelling Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .

[16]  P. Lagadec,et al.  Disaster via Airmail: The Launching of a Global Reaction Capacity After the 2001 Anthrax Attacks , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[17]  Dwight M. Jaffee,et al.  Non-Diversification Traps in Markets for Catastrophic Risk ∗ , 2006 .

[18]  T. Sandler,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of Transnational Terrorism , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[19]  G. McClelland,et al.  Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events , 1993 .

[20]  V. Bier Choosing What to Protect , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[21]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .

[22]  Jack B. Soll,et al.  Mental Budgeting and Consumer Decisions , 1996 .

[23]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[24]  Harry W. Richardson,et al.  The Economic Impact of a Terrorist Attack on the Twin Ports of Los Angeles—Long Beach , 2005 .

[25]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Interdependent Security , 2003 .

[26]  T. Sandler,et al.  Collective Action and Transnational Terrorism , 2003 .

[27]  W. Polonsky,et al.  The Tipping Point , 2007, The Diabetes educator.

[28]  Larry Ness,et al.  The Economic Impact of a Terrorist Attack , 2006 .

[29]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Decision making under ignorance: Arguing with yourself , 1995 .

[30]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of Terrorism Risk Financing Solutions , 2007 .

[31]  Richard Lugar,et al.  Lugar Survey on Proliferation Threats and Responses , 2005 .

[32]  Susan E. Martonosi,et al.  Evaluating the Viability of 100 Per Cent Container Inspection at America's Ports , 2005 .

[33]  O. Huber,et al.  Active information search and complete information presentation in naturalistic risky decision tasks , 1997 .

[34]  D von Winterfeldt,et al.  A Risk and Economic Analysis of Dirty Bomb Attacks on the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  E. Michel‐Kerjan,et al.  How Does the Corporate World Cope With Mega-Terrorism? Puzzling Evidence from Terrorism Insurance Markets , 2006 .

[36]  E. Michel‐Kerjan,et al.  New Challenges in Critical Infrastructures : A US Perspective , 2003 .