Compact Performance Models and Comparisons for Gigascale On-Chip Global Interconnect Technologies

The on-chip global interconnect with conventional Cu/low-k and delay-optimized repeater scheme faces great challenges in the nanometer regime owing to its severe performance degradation. This paper describes the analytical models and performance comparisons of novel interconnect technologies and circuit architectures to cope with the interconnect performance bottlenecks. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) and optics-based interconnects exhibit promising physical properties for replacing the current Cu/low-k-based global interconnects. We quantify the performance of these novel interconnects and compare them with Cu/low-k wires for future high-performance integrated circuits. The foregoing trends are studied with technology node and bandwidth density in terms of latency and power dissipation. Optical wires have the lowest latency and power consumption, whereas a CNT bundle has a lower latency than Cu. The new circuit scheme, i.e., "capacitively driven low-swing interconnect (CDLSI)," has the potential to effect a significant energy saving and latency reduction. We present an accurate analytical optimization model for the CDLSI wire scheme. In addition, we quantify and compare the delay and energy expenditure for not only the different interconnect circuit schemes but also the various future technologies, such as Cu, CNT, and optics. We find that the CDLSI circuit scheme outperforms the conventional interconnects in latency and energy per bit for a lower bandwidth requirement, whereas these advantages degrade for higher bandwidth requirements. Finally, we explore the impact of the CNT bundle and the CDLSI on a via blockage factor. The CNT shows a significant reduction in via blockage, whereas the CDLSI does not help to alleviate it, although the CDLSI results in a reduced number of repeaters due to the differential signaling scheme.

[1]  Wei Wang,et al.  Analyzing Conductance of Mixed Carbon-Nanotube Bundles for Interconnect Applications , 2007, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[2]  Eby G. Friedman,et al.  Effects of inductance on the propagation delay and repeater insertion in VLSI circuits: A summary , 2003 .

[3]  E. H. Sondheimer,et al.  The mean free path of electrons in metals , 1952 .

[4]  Shinobu Fujita,et al.  A 1 GHz integrated circuit with carbon nanotube interconnects and silicon transistors. , 2008, Nano letters.

[5]  Keith A. Jenkins,et al.  When are transmission-line effects important for on-chip interconnections? , 1997 .

[6]  J. Meindl,et al.  A novel via blockage model and its implications , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 International Interconnect Technology Conference (Cat. No.00EX407).

[7]  P. McEuen,et al.  Single-walled carbon nanotube electronics , 2002 .

[8]  J. Meindl,et al.  Performance Modeling for Single- and Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes as Signal and Power Interconnects in Gigascale Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[9]  W. Steinhögl,et al.  Size-dependent resistivity of metallic wires in the mesoscopic range , 2002 .

[10]  David A. B. Miller,et al.  C-band side-entry Ge quantum-well electroabsorption modulator on SOI operating at 1 V swing , 2008 .

[11]  P. Kapur,et al.  The Delay, Energy, and Bandwidth Comparisons between Copper, Carbon Nanotube, and Optical Interconnects for Local and Global Wiring Application , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Interconnect Technology Conferencee.

[12]  Ge on Si by novel heteroepitaxy for high efficiency near infrared photodetection , 2006, 2006 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics and 2006 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[13]  Kwon,et al.  Unusually high thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes , 2000, Physical review letters.

[14]  Qianfan Xu,et al.  Silicon microring resonators with 1.5-μm radius , 2008 .

[15]  P. Burke Luttinger liquid theory as a model of the gigahertz electrical properties of carbon nanotubes , 2002 .

[16]  T. Nirschl,et al.  A yield-optimized latch-type SRAM sense amplifier , 2003, ESSCIRC 2004 - 29th European Solid-State Circuits Conference (IEEE Cat. No.03EX705).

[17]  James D. Meindl,et al.  Performance Benchmarking for Graphene Nanoribbon, Carbon Nanotube, and Cu Interconnects , 2008, 2008 International Interconnect Technology Conference.

[18]  John J. Plombon,et al.  High-frequency electrical properties of individual and bundled carbon nanotubes , 2007 .

[19]  J. Meindl,et al.  Conductance Modeling for Graphene Nanoribbon (GNR) Interconnects , 2007, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[20]  Justin Schauer,et al.  High Speed and Low Energy Capacitively Driven On-Chip Wires , 2008, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[21]  H. B. Bakoglu,et al.  Circuits, interconnections, and packaging for VLSI , 1990 .

[22]  Pawan Kapur Scaling induced performance challenges/limitations of on-chip metal interconnects and comparisons with optical interconnects , 2002 .

[23]  D.A.B. Miller,et al.  Rationale and challenges for optical interconnects to electronic chips , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[24]  Qianfan Xu,et al.  Micrometre-scale silicon electro-optic modulator , 2005, Nature.

[25]  Kaustav Banerjee,et al.  Analysis of on-chip inductance effects for distributed RLC interconnects , 2002, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[26]  M. Shatzkes,et al.  Electrical-Resistivity Model for Polycrystalline Films: the Case of Arbitrary Reflection at External Surfaces , 1970 .

[27]  P. Kapur,et al.  Technology and reliability constrained future copper interconnects. I. Resistance modeling , 2002 .

[28]  P. Kapur,et al.  Performance Comparisons Between Carbon Nanotubes, Optical, and Cu for Future High-Performance On-Chip Interconnect Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[29]  Kurt Keutzer,et al.  A global wiring paradigm for deep submicron design , 2000, IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst..

[30]  B. Rajasekharan,et al.  How do carbon nanotubes fit into the semiconductor roadmap? , 2005 .

[31]  Kaustav Banerjee,et al.  Interconnect limits on gigascale integration (GSI) in the 21st century , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[32]  Krishna C. Saraswat,et al.  Technology and reliability constrained future copper interconnects. II. Performance implications , 2002 .

[33]  Pawan Kapur,et al.  Power estimation in global interconnects and its reduction using a novel repeater optimization methodology , 2002, DAC '02.

[34]  George Varghese,et al.  Low-swing on-chip signaling techniques: effectiveness and robustness , 2000, IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst..

[35]  J. Meindl,et al.  Performance comparison between carbon nanotube and copper interconnects for gigascale integration (GSI) , 2005, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[36]  C. Xu,et al.  Graphene nano-ribbon (GNR) interconnects: A genuine contender or a delusive dream? , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[37]  T. N. Todorov,et al.  Carbon nanotubes as long ballistic conductors , 1998, Nature.

[38]  C. Burrus,et al.  Band-Edge Electroabsorption in Quantum Well Structures: The Quantum-Confined Stark Effect , 1984 .

[39]  Alvin Leng Sun Loke,et al.  Microstructure and reliability of copper interconnects , 1998 .

[40]  P. Kapur,et al.  Comparisons between electrical and optical interconnects for on-chip signaling , 2002, Proceedings of the IEEE 2002 International Interconnect Technology Conference (Cat. No.02EX519).

[41]  Y. Massoud,et al.  Understanding the Impact of Inductance in Carbon Nanotube Bundles for VLSI Interconnect Using Scalable Modeling Techniques , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[42]  J. Meindl,et al.  Design and Performance Modeling for Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Local, Semiglobal, and Global Interconnects in Gigascale Integrated Systems , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[43]  M.K. Emsley,et al.  High speed resonant-cavity enhanced Ge photodetectors on reflecting Si substrates for 1550 nm operation , 2004, The 17th Annual Meeting of the IEEELasers and Electro-Optics Society, 2004. LEOS 2004..