Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations Open Access the Missed Lessons of Sir Austin Bradford Hill

Austin Bradford Hill's landmark 1965 paper contains several important lessons for the current conduct of epidemiology. Unfortunately, it is almost exclusively cited as the source of the "Bradford-Hill criteria" for inferring causation when association is observed, despite Hill's explicit statement that cause-effect decisions cannot be based on a set of rules. Overlooked are Hill's important lessons about how to make decisions based on epidemiologic evidence. He advised epidemiologists to avoid over-emphasizing statistical significance testing, given the observation that systematic error is often greater than random error. His compelling and intuitive examples point out the need to consider costs and benefits when making decisions about health-promoting interventions. These lessons, which offer ways to dramatically increase the contribution of health science to decision making, are as needed today as they were when Hill presented them.

[1]  A. B. Hill.  The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? , 1965, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[2]  A. B. Hill.  A Short Textbook of Medical Statistics , 1985 .

[3]  Sander Greenland,et al.  The Impact of Prior Distributions for Uncontrolled Confounding and Response Bias , 2003 .

[4]  Carl V Phillips,et al.  Lead editorial: The need for greater perspective and innovation in epidemiology , 2004, Epidemiologic perspectives & innovations : EP+I.

[5]  N L Lee,et al.  Frequency of policy recommendations in epidemiologic publications. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[6]  Our policy on policy. , 2001, Epidemiology.

[7]  J. Pearl,et al.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. , 1999, Epidemiology.

[8]  Alvan R. Feinstein,et al.  Principles of Medical Statistics , 2001 .

[9]  T. Lash,et al.  A Sensitivity Analysis to Separate Bias Due to Confounding from Bias Due to Predicting Misclassification by a Variable That Does Both , 2000, Epidemiology.

[10]  Carl V Phillips,et al.  Publication bias in situ , 2004 .

[11]  E. A. Cheeseman.  Principles of Medical Statistics, 9th edition , 1972 .

[12]  P. Kokkonen,et al.  [Resources in the future]. , 2001, Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja.

[13]  Carl V Phillips,et al.  Quantifying and Reporting Uncertainty from Systematic Errors , 2003, Epidemiology.

[14]  K J Rothman,et al.  A show of confidence. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  S. Greenland,et al.  Estimating causal effects. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[16]  Hilary E. Tillett.  Bradford Hill's Principles of Medical Statistics. , 1992 .

[17]  M Susser,et al.  What is a cause and how do we know one? A grammar for pragmatic epidemiology. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[18]  C V Phillips,et al.  The economics of 'more research is needed'. , 2001, International journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Chapter,et al.  Chapter 6.2 , 2022 .

[20]  K. Rothman,et al.  Policy Recommendations in Epidemiology Research Papers , 1993 .

[21]  Timothy L Lash,et al.  Semi-Automated Sensitivity Analysis to Assess Systematic Errors in Observational Data , 2003, Epidemiology.

[22]  G. Shaw,et al.  Maternal pesticide exposure from multiple sources and selected congenital anomalies. , 1999 .

[23]  Carl V Phillips,et al.  Quantifying errors without random sampling , 2003, BMC medical research methodology.

[24]  J W Cullen,et al.  Cancer prevention and control. , 1994, Seminars in oncology.

[25]  C Poole,et al.  Beyond the confidence interval. , 1987, American journal of public health.