Vocal cooperation between the sexes in Little Spotted Kiwi Apteryx owenii

Sexual call dimorphism in birds is usually associated with sexual size dimorphism. Departures from this relationship can be used to infer call function, but research into inter-sexual call differences, as with song function in general, has been restricted by a bias towards male passerines. The nocturnal and flightless New Zealand kiwi (Apterygidae) are acoustically similar but taxonomically and ecologically very different from other birds, so provide a contrast in exploring avian call function and evolution. However, kiwi acoustic ecology is poorly understood, with the calls of only one of the five kiwi species spectrally described, and acoustic differences between the sexes virtually unknown. We conducted the first bioacoustic study of Little Spotted Kiwi Apteryx owenii, and assessed sexual call dimorphism in this species. There were significant inter-sexual differences in call temporal and frequency characteristics that were not related to size dimorphism. Contribution to duets and variation in temporal structure with call context also differed between the sexes. We suggest that these differences indicate divergent call function, with male calls more suited for territory defence, and female calls for pair contact. There was a striking lack of overlap in the frequency spectrum distributions of male and female calls, which was also unrelated to size and was further emphasized by the presence of formants in female calls. We propose that this provides evidence for inter-sexual acoustic cooperation in call frequency, of a type which to our knowledge has not previously been described in birds. This may result from selection for enhanced joint resource defence in kiwi.

[1]  I. Volodin,et al.  THE TECHNIQUE OF NONINVASIVE DISTANT SEXING FOR FOUR MONOMORPHIC DENDROCYGNA WHISTLING DUCK SPECIES BY THEIR LOUD WHISTLES , 2009 .

[2]  Lauryn Benedict Occurrence and life history correlates of vocal duetting in North American passerines , 2007 .

[3]  D. Mennill,et al.  Body size correlates negatively with the frequency of distress calls and songs of Neotropical birds , 2011 .

[4]  P. Tubaro,et al.  Body mass and habitat correlates of song structure in a primitive group of birds , 2002 .

[5]  Peter R. Grant,et al.  Songs of Darwin's finches diverge when a new species enters the community , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  D. Reby,et al.  Female red deer prefer the roars of larger males , 2007, Biology Letters.

[7]  J. Wild,et al.  Kiwi Forego Vision in the Guidance of Their Nocturnal Activities , 2007, PloS one.

[8]  E. Jarvis,et al.  Learned Birdsong and the Neurobiology of Human Language , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  W. Fitch Acoustic exaggeration of size in birds via tracheal elongation: comparative and theoretical analyses , 1999 .

[10]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  W. Fitch,et al.  Cues to body size in the formant spacing of male koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) bellows: honesty in an exaggerated trait , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[12]  R. Wiley,et al.  Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: Implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations , 1978, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[13]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Fourteen microsatellite loci cross-amplify in all five kiwi species (Apteryx spp.) and reveal extremely low genetic variation in little spotted kiwi (A. owenii) , 2010, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[14]  P. Marler,et al.  Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization , 1977, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  N. Seddon ECOLOGICAL ADAPTATION AND SPECIES RECOGNITION DRIVES VOCAL EVOLUTION IN NEOTROPICAL SUBOSCINE BIRDS , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  M. Hall A Review of Vocal Duetting in Birds , 2009 .

[17]  Hans Slabbekoorn,et al.  Chapter 6 – Singing in the wild: The ecology of birdsong , 2004 .

[18]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  A PERFORMANCE CONSTRAINT ON THE EVOLUTION OF TRILLED VOCALIZATIONS IN A SONGBIRD FAMILY (PASSERIFORMES: EMBERIZIDAE) , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods , 2002 .

[20]  R. Suthers Variable asymmetry and resonance in the avian vocal tract: a structural basis for individually distinct vocalizations , 1994, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[21]  Spatial organization of the North Island Brown Kiwi Apteryx australis mantelli: sex, pairing status and territoriality , 2008 .

[22]  Tobias Riede,et al.  Nonlinear acoustics in the pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): vocalizing at the edge. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  A. Baker,et al.  Molecular and other biological evidence supports the recognition of at least three species of brown kiwi , 2003, Conservation Genetics.

[24]  S. Collins,et al.  Chapter 2 – Vocal fighting and flirting: the functions of birdsong , 2004 .

[25]  D. Mennill Individual distinctiveness in avian vocalizations and the spatial monitoring of behaviour , 2011 .

[26]  S. Zollinger,et al.  Two-voice complexity from a single side of the syrinx in northern mockingbird Mimus polyglottos vocalizations , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  E. Morton Ecological Sources of Selection on Avian Sounds , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[28]  J. Belthoff,et al.  Bounce and Double Trill Songs of Male and Female Western Screech-Owls: Characterization and Usefulness for Classification of Sex , 2001 .

[29]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[30]  Claire L. Smith,et al.  Solo and duet calling in the pheasant coucal: sex and individual call differences in a nesting cuckoo with reversed size dimorphism , 2008 .

[31]  W. Fitch Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Tobias Riede,et al.  Nonlinear acoustics in pant hoots of common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): Frequency jumps, subharmonics, biphonation, and deterministic chaos , 2004, American journal of primatology.

[33]  Marc Naguib,et al.  Estimating the distance to a source of sound: mechanisms and adaptations for long-range communication , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  Daniel J. Mennill,et al.  Individual Variation and Lek-Based Vocal Distinctiveness in Songs of the Screaming Piha (Lipaugus Vociferans), A Suboscine Songbird , 2008 .

[35]  M. Double,et al.  Breaking the rules: sex roles and genetic mating system of the pheasant coucal , 2011, Oecologia.

[36]  Elizabeth P. Derryberry,et al.  Birdsongs keep pace with city life: changes in song over time in an urban songbird affects communication , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Hans Slabbekoorn,et al.  BIRDSONG AND SOUND TRANSMISSION: THE BENEFITSOF REVERBERATIONS , 2002 .

[38]  A. Mack,et al.  LOW-FREQUENCY VOCALIZATIONS BY CASSOWARIES (CASUARIUS SPP.) , 2003 .

[39]  A. Goldizen,et al.  Habitat type and density influence vocal signal design in satin bowerbirds. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[40]  D. Brunton,et al.  Nesting success and breeding ecology in a high-density population of Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli) , 2011 .

[41]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative , 2000 .

[42]  S. Parsons,et al.  Vocalizations of the North Island Brown Kiwi (Apteryx Mantelli) , 2008 .

[43]  Clifford M. Hurvich,et al.  Regression and time series model selection in small samples , 1989 .

[44]  T. Janicke,et al.  Sex recognition in brown skuas: do acoustic signals matter? , 2007, Journal of Ornithology.

[45]  H. Ogawa,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism of Acoustic Signals in the Oriental White Stork: Non-invasive Identification of Sex in Birds , 2004, Zoological science.

[46]  Darryl N. Jones,et al.  Vocalisations of the Marbled Frogmouth II: An Assessment of Vocal Individuality as a Potential Census Technique , 1997 .

[47]  B. Taborsky,et al.  The mating system and stability of pairs in kiwi Apteryx spp. , 1999 .

[48]  J. Wild,et al.  Evolution of Brain Size in the Palaeognath Lineage, with an Emphasis on New Zealand Ratites , 2007, Brain, Behavior and Evolution.

[49]  Charles E. Taylor,et al.  Territorial dynamics of Mexican Ant‐thrushes Formicarius moniliger revealed by individual recognition of their songs , 2011 .

[50]  N. Fletcher,et al.  Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  B. Taborsky,et al.  Social Organization of North Island Brown Kiwi: Long‐term Pairs and Three Types of Male Spacing Behaviour , 2010 .

[52]  I. Castro,et al.  A new prey‐detection mechanism for kiwi (Apteryx spp.) suggests convergent evolution between paleognathous and neognathous birds , 2007, Journal of anatomy.

[53]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[54]  J. Endler Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[55]  E. Morton On the Occurrence and Significance of Motivation-Structural Rules in Some Bird and Mammal Sounds , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[56]  N. Mathevon,et al.  Morphological versus acoustic analysis: what is the most efficient method for sexing yelkouan shearwaters Puffinus yelkouan? , 2007, Journal of Ornithology.

[57]  M. Potter,et al.  The relative importance of olfaction and remote touch in prey detection by North Island brown kiwis , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[58]  D. Wallschläger,et al.  Correlation of song frequency and body weight in passerine birds , 1980, Experientia.

[59]  S. A. Morgan,et al.  Investigation of the mechanisms of low‐frequency wind noise generation outdoors , 1992 .

[60]  F. Goller,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism of the Zebra Finch Syrinx Indicates Adaptation for High Fundamental Frequencies in Males , 2010, PloS one.

[61]  J. Mclennan Breeding of north Island brown kiwi, Apteryx australis mantelli, in Hawke's Bay, New Zealand , 1988 .

[62]  J. Jolly A field study of the breeding biology of the little spotted kiwi (Apteryx owenii) with emphasis on the causes of nest failures , 1989 .

[63]  Bradley C Fedy,et al.  Territory defence in tropical birds: are females as aggressive as males? , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  H. Robertson,et al.  Use of trained dogs to determine the age structure and conservation status of kiwi Apteryx spp. populations , 2009, Bird Conservation International.

[65]  C. ten Cate,et al.  Females alter their song when challenged in a sex-role reversed bird species , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[66]  W. Hoese,et al.  Vocal tract function in birdsong production: experimental manipulation of beak movements. , 2000, The Journal of experimental biology.

[67]  J. Wild,et al.  Evidence for an Auditory Fovea in the New Zealand Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli) , 2011, PloS one.

[68]  T. Wright,et al.  Pair duets in the yellow-naped amazon (Amazona auropalliata): Phonology and syntax , 2007 .

[69]  D. Rendall,et al.  Pitch (F0) and formant profiles of human vowels and vowel-like baboon grunts: the role of vocalizer body size and voice-acoustic allometry. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[70]  P. Marler Chapter 5 – Bird calls: a cornucopia for communication , 2004 .

[71]  W. Forbes On the Conformation of the Thoracic End of the Trachea in the“Ratite”Birds. , 2009 .

[72]  Franz Goller,et al.  Frequency modulation during song in a suboscine does not require vocal muscles. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[73]  P. Beaver Ontogeny of Vocalization in the Greater Rhea , 1978 .

[74]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Olfaction in birds: a closer look at the kiwi (Apterygidae) , 2010 .

[75]  Eliot A. Brenowitz,et al.  The Role of Body Size, Phylogeny, and Ambient Noise in the Evolution of Bird Song , 1985, The American Naturalist.