Effect of Provisional Cements on Shear Bond Strength of Porcelain Laminate Veneers

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of three provisional cements and two cleaning techniques on the final bond strength of porcelain laminate veneers. Methods: The occlusal third of the crowns of forty molar teeth were sectioned and embedded in autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Dentin surfaces were polished and specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=10). Provisional restorations were fabricated and two provisional restorations were cemented onto each tooth. Restorations were fixed with one of three different provisional cements: eugenol-free provisional cement (Cavex), calcium hydroxide (Dycal), and light-cured provisional cement (Tempond Clear). Provisional restorations were removed with either a dental explorer and air-water spray, or a cleaning bur (Opticlean). In the control group, provisional restorations were not used on the surfaces of specimens. IPS Empress 2 ceramic discs were luted with a dual-cured resin cement (Panavia F). Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA, Tukey’s HSD and Dunnett tests. Surfaces were examined by scanning electronic microscopy. Results: Significant differences were found between the control group and both the light-cured provisional cement groups and the eugenol-free provisional cement-cleaning bur group (P<.05). Groups that had received light-cured provisional cement showed the lowest bond strength values. Conclusions: Selection of the provisional cement is an important factor in the ultimate bond strength of the final restoration. Calcium hydroxide provisional cement and cleaning with a dental explorer are advisable.

[1]  T. Donovan,et al.  Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[2]  Duygu Saraç,et al.  Effect of the dentin cleansing techniques on dentin wetting and on the bond strength of a resin luting agent. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  H. Matsumura,et al.  Influence of temporary cement remnant and surface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system. , 2005, Journal of oral science.

[4]  C. Soares,et al.  Influence of provisional cements on ultimate bond strength of indirect composite restorations to dentin. , 2005, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[5]  M. Burrow,et al.  Effect of residual water on dentin bond strength and hybridization of a one-bottle adhesive system. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[6]  G. Goldstein,et al.  In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  M. D. De Goes,et al.  How wet should dentin be? Comparison of methods to remove excess water during moist bonding. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[8]  A. H. Tjan,et al.  Fracture load and mode of failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  M. Balkenhol,et al.  Rewetting strategies for bonding to dry dentin with an acetone-based adhesive. , 2000, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[10]  G. Göbel,et al.  Bonding porcelain laminate veneer provisional restorations: An experimental study. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  H. Lüthy,et al.  Effect of cleaning dentine with soap and pumice on shear bond strength of dentine-bonding agents. , 1997, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  C. Davidson,et al.  Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. , 1996, American journal of dentistry.

[13]  P. Schärer,et al.  Intrapulpal pressure and thermal cycling: effect on shear bond strength of eleven modern dentin bonding agents. , 1993 .

[14]  R. Terata Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement--study on removal of temporary cement. , 1993, Dental materials journal.

[15]  S. Paul,et al.  Intrapulpal pressure and thermal cycling: effect on shear bond strength of eleven modern dentin bonding agents. , 1993, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[16]  S. Judge Ceramics in clinical dentistry' , 1988, British Dental Journal.

[17]  J. Gunsolley,et al.  Effect of preparation cleaning procedures on crown retention. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  E. K. Hansen,et al.  Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin-bonding agents. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of dental research.