Achieving a more effective concentric braced frame by the double-stage yield BRB

Abstract The steel Concentric Braced Frame (CBF) is a popular structural type for buildings in seismic areas. In fact, it can conveniently provide the building with large strength and stiffness. Furthermore, the simplicity of fabrication that derives from the use of shear connections between beams and columns appeals to structural designers. Unfortunately, the dissipation capacity of steel braces is limited and the structural type is low redundant and thus prone to storey collapse mechanisms. To improve the seismic performance of the CBF double-stage BRBs (DYBs) could be used instead of conventional steel braces. The DYB exhibits high dissipative and stable cyclic response and, if inserted into a steel frame, promote the spread of damage owing to the shape of its hysteresis loop. Despite its qualities, in literature there are no design methods that allow its use. Hence, in this paper, a design method for steel frames with DYBs is formulated in compliance with the principles of the European seismic code. The behaviour factor q is calibrated to meet the performance objectives of Eurocode 8. The calibration is performed by nonlinear dynamic analysis conducted with OpenSees on 75 frames with different features. The numerical model is calibrated on the results of the experimental tests performed by Pan and his co-workers at Tsinghua University in Beijing (China). The deduced results confirm the effectiveness of the frame with DYBs, which can be designed with q values greater than those used for traditional steel braced frames.

[1]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Strongback System: A Way to Reduce Damage Concentration in Steel-Braced Frames , 2015 .

[2]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Numerical investigation of seismic behavior of short-core all-steel buckling restrained braces , 2015 .

[3]  Blake M. Andrews,et al.  Ductility capacity models for buckling-restrained braces , 2009 .

[4]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  Seismic design criteria for Chevron CBFs: European vs North American codes (Part-1) , 2017 .

[5]  T. Takeuchi,et al.  Collapse Analysis of Steel Frames Considering Fracture of Braces and End of Beams , 2018 .

[6]  Francesco Genna,et al.  Analytical estimates for the lateral thrust in bolted steel buckling-restrained braces , 2016 .

[7]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Design and full‐scale experimental evaluation of a seismically endurant steel buckling‐restrained brace system , 2018 .

[8]  Andrea Dall'Asta,et al.  Elastoplastic model for steel buckling-restrained braces , 2012 .

[9]  M Mahmoudi,et al.  EVALUATING RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTORS OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES , 2010 .

[10]  Dimitrios G. Lignos,et al.  Computational Approach for Collapse Assessment of Concentrically Braced Frames in Seismic Regions , 2014 .

[11]  Ryota Matsui,et al.  Out‐of‐plane stability of buckling‐restrained braces including moment transfer capacity , 2014 .

[12]  Matthew R. Eatherton,et al.  Development and experimental validation of a nickel–titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace , 2012 .

[13]  Larry Alan Fahnestock,et al.  Evaluation of buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance considering reserve strength , 2011 .

[14]  Raffaele Landolfo,et al.  Seismic design criteria for chevron CBFs: Proposals for the next EC8 (part-2) , 2017 .

[15]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES MADE WITH RECTANGULAR HOLLOW BRACING MEMBERS , 2003 .

[16]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .

[17]  Gregory G. Deierlein,et al.  Earthquake resilient steel braced frames with controlled rocking and energy dissipating fuses , 2011 .

[18]  Edoardo M. Marino A unified approach for the design of high ductility steel frames with concentric braces in the framework of Eurocode 8 , 2014 .

[19]  R. J. Cooke,et al.  Constitutive parameter calibration for structural steel: Non-uniqueness and loss of accuracy , 2015 .

[21]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Advances in theory of plastic mechanism control: closed form solution for MR‐Frames , 2015 .

[22]  R Tremblay,et al.  Achieving a Stable Inelastic Seismic Response for Multi-Story Concentrically Braced Steel Frames , 2003 .

[23]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Design of steel frames equipped with BRBs in the framework of Eurocode 8 , 2015 .

[24]  Tsutomu Usami,et al.  Developing high‐performance aluminum alloy buckling‐restrained braces based on series of low‐cycle fatigue tests , 2012 .

[25]  P. Pan,et al.  Development and experimental validation of an assembled steel double-stage yield buckling restrained brace , 2018 .

[26]  Behrouz Asgarian,et al.  BRBF response modification factor , 2009 .

[27]  Kailai Deng,et al.  Seismic performance of a reinforced concrete frame equipped with a double‐stage yield buckling restrained brace , 2017 .

[28]  Qiang Xie,et al.  State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia , 2005 .

[29]  P. Rossi,et al.  A design procedure for pin‐supported rocking buckling‐restrained braced frames , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[30]  Federico M. Mazzolani,et al.  Assessment of the Design Criteria for Concentric V-Braced Steel Structures According to Italian and European Codes , 2017 .

[31]  Satoshi Yamada,et al.  Estimation of Cumulative Deformation Capacity of Buckling Restrained Braces , 2008 .

[32]  Toru Takeuchi,et al.  Seismic performance of controlled spine frames with energy-dissipating members , 2015 .

[33]  R. Landolfo,et al.  Proposal of design rules for ductile X‐CBFS in the framework of EUROCODE 8 , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[34]  P. Pan,et al.  Study of GFRP Steel Buckling Restraint Braces , 2015 .

[35]  F. Mazzolani,et al.  Numerical Study on Moment Resisting Frames under Monotonic and Cyclic Loads , 2018 .

[36]  Kailai Deng,et al.  Development of a buckling restrained shear panel damper , 2015 .

[37]  Kazuhiko Kasai,et al.  Passive Control Systems for Seismic Damage Mitigation , 1998 .

[38]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Importance of Isotropic Hardening in the Modeling of Buckling Restrained Braces , 2015 .

[39]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members , 2002 .

[40]  STEFANO PAMPANIN,et al.  PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC RESPONSE OF FRAME STRUCTURES INCLUDING RESIDUAL DEFORMATIONS. PART II: MULTI-DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS , 2003 .