Structure of receptive fields in a computational model of area 3b of primary sensory cortex

In a previous work, we introduced a computational model of area 3b which is built upon the neural field theory and receives input from a simplified model of the index distal finger pad populated by a random set of touch receptors (Merkell cells). This model has been shown to be able to self-organize following the random stimulation of the finger pad model and to cope, to some extent, with cortical or skin lesions. The main hypothesis of the model is that learning of skin representations occurs at the thalamo-cortical level while cortico-cortical connections serve a stereotyped competition mechanism that shapes the receptive fields. To further assess this hypothesis and the validity of the model, we reproduced in this article the exact experimental protocol of DiCarlo et al. that has been used to examine the structure of receptive fields in area 3b of the primary somatosensory cortex. Using the same analysis toolset, the model yields consistent results, having most of the receptive fields to contain a single region of excitation and one to several regions of inhibition. We further proceeded our study using a dynamic competition that deeply influences the formation of the receptive fields. We hypothesized this dynamic competition to correspond to some form of somatosensory attention that may help to precisely shape the receptive fields. To test this hypothesis, we designed a protocol where an arbitrary region of interest is delineated on the index distal finger pad and we either (1) instructed explicitly the model to attend to this region (simulating an attentional signal) (2) preferentially trained the model on this region or (3) combined the two aforementioned protocols simultaneously. Results tend to confirm that dynamic competition leads to shrunken receptive fields and its joint interaction with intensive training promotes a massive receptive fields migration and shrinkage.

[1]  R. Veit,et al.  Effects of co-activation on cortical organization and discrimination performance , 2004, Neuroreport.

[2]  Treue Stefan,et al.  Attention reshapes center-surround receptive-field structure in Macaque cortical area MT , 2008 .

[3]  R. Davidson,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .

[4]  Axel Hutt,et al.  Activity spread and breathers induced by finite transmission speeds in two-dimensional neural fields. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  J. Cowan,et al.  A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue , 1973, Kybernetik.

[6]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[8]  Francisco Vega-Bermudez,et al.  Attention in the Somatosensory System , 2001 .

[9]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Effects of S-adenosylmethionine on liver methionine metabolism and steatosis with ethanol-induced liver injury in rats , 2008, Hepatology international.

[10]  P. Bressloff Spatiotemporal dynamics of continuum neural fields , 2012 .

[11]  Balasundar I Raju,et al.  3-D finite-element models of human and monkey fingertips to investigate the mechanics of tactile sense. , 2003, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[12]  T W Picton,et al.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention. , 1974, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Merzenich,et al.  Alterations of the cortical representation of the rat ventrum induced by nursing behavior , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  Marc-Oliver Gewaltig,et al.  Towards Reproducible Descriptions of Neuronal Network Models , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  L. Abbott,et al.  Invariant visual responses from attentional gain fields. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Book Review: Gain Modulation in the Central Nervous System: Where Behavior, Neurophysiology, and Computation Meet , 2001, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[17]  Joseph S. Silverman,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 2 , 1979 .

[18]  R. Dykes,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of acetylcholine and the role of the basal forebrain in the somatosensory cortex of the cat. I. Cortical neurons excited by glutamate. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  R. Nelson The Somatosensory System , 2001 .

[20]  H C Thode,et al.  Gamma distribution model describes maturational curves for delta wave amplitude, cortical metabolic rate and synaptic density. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Attention Reshapes Center-Surround Receptive Field Structure in Macaque Cortical Area MT , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  Larry E. Roberts,et al.  Functional Organization of Primary Somatosensory Cortex Depends on the Focus of Attention , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Paré,et al.  Distribution and terminal arborizations of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the glabrous finger pads of the monkey , 2002, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  Spatiotemporal Receptive Fields of Peripheral Afferents and Cortical Area 3b and 1 Neurons in the Primate Somatosensory System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Goodwin,et al.  Representation of curved surfaces in responses of mechanoreceptive afferent fibers innervating the monkey's fingerpad , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  John P. Donoghue,et al.  Cholinergic modulation of sensory responses in rat primary somatic sensory cortex , 1987, Brain Research.

[27]  V. Menon,et al.  Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function , 2010, Brain Structure and Function.

[28]  R. Dykes,et al.  Differential control of cortical activity by the basal forebrain in rats: a role for both cholinergic and inhibitory influences , 1997, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[29]  J. G. Taylor,et al.  Neural ‘bubble’ dynamics in two dimensions: foundations , 1999, Biological Cybernetics.

[30]  R. Dykes,et al.  Long-term enhancement of evoked potentials in cat somatosensory cortex produced by co-activation of the basal forebrain and cutaneous receptors , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  S S Hsiao,et al.  Spatial pattern representation and transformation in monkey somatosensory cortex. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  E. Oja Simplified neuron model as a principal component analyzer , 1982, Journal of mathematical biology.

[33]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Receptive Field Shift and Shrinkage in Macaque Middle Temporal Area through Attentional Gain Modulation , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Kojima Structure and function , 2005 .

[35]  Kenneth O. Johnson,et al.  A continuum mechanical model of mechanoreceptive afferent responses to indented spatial patterns. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  S. David,et al.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1? , 2007, Hearing Research.

[37]  S. Juliano,et al.  Cholinergic depletion prevents expansion of topographic maps in somatosensory cortex. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  M. Srinivasan Surface deflection of primate fingertip under line load. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  B. Godde,et al.  Tactile Coactivation-Induced Changes in Spatial Discrimination Performance , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  J. Kaas,et al.  Magnification, receptive-field area, and "hypercolumn" size in areas 3b and 1 of somatosensory cortex in owl monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation , 1976 .

[42]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Increased Cortical Representation of the Fingers of the Left Hand in String Players , 1995, Science.

[43]  Advances in Psychological Science, Volume 2: Biological and Cognitive Aspects , 1999 .

[44]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Topographic reorganization of the hand representation in cortical area 3b owl monkeys trained in a frequency-discrimination task. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  J. DiCarlo,et al.  Structure of Receptive Fields in Area 3b of Primary Somatosensory Cortex in the Alert Monkey , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[47]  R. Burkard Human Auditory Evoked Potentials , 2010 .

[48]  R. Dykes,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of acetylcholine and the role of the basal forebrain in the somatosensory cortex of the cat. II. Cortical neurons excited by somatic stimuli. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  S. Bressler,et al.  Operational principles of neurocognitive networks. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[50]  S S Hsiao,et al.  Effects of selective attention on spatial form processing in monkey primary and secondary somatosensory cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  S. Amari Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[52]  Michael E. Hasselmo,et al.  Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection , 2005, Brain Research Reviews.

[53]  Nicolas P. Rougier,et al.  A Neural Field Model of the Somatosensory Cortex: Formation, Maintenance and Reorganization of Ordered Topographic Maps , 2012, PloS one.