Interference of lateralized distractors on arithmetic problem solving: a functional role for attention shifts in mental calculation

Solving arithmetic problems has been shown to induce shifts of spatial attention in simple probe-detection tasks, subtractions orienting attention to the left side and additions to the right side of space. Whether these attentional shifts constitute epiphenomena or are critically linked to the calculation process is still unknown. In the present study, we investigate participants’ performance on addition and subtraction solving while they have to detect central or lateralized targets. The results show that lateralized distractors presented in the hemifield congruent to the operation to be solved interfere with arithmetical solving: participants are slower to solve subtractions or additions when distractors are located on the left or on the right, respectively. These results converge with previous data to show that attentional shifts underlie not only number processing but also mental arithmetic. They extend them as they reveal the reverse effect of the one previously reported by showing that inducing attention shifts interferes with the solving of arithmetic problems. They also demonstrate that spatial attentional shifts are part of the calculation procedure of solving mentally arithmetic problems. Their functional role is to access, from the first operand, the representation of the result in a direction congruent to the operation.

[1]  K. Priftis,et al.  Larger, smaller, odd or even? Task-specific effects of optokinetic stimulation on the mental number space , 2015 .

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Jamie I. D. Campbell Handbook of mathematical cognition , 2004 .

[4]  K. Priftis,et al.  Optokinetic Stimulation Modulates Neglect for the Number Space: Evidence from Mental Number Interval Bisection , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  Michael D. Dodd,et al.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Pom Charras,et al.  Additions are biased by operands: evidence from repeated versus different operands , 2014, Psychological research.

[7]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[8]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Human Neuroscience Original Research Article Neglect Impairs Explicit Processing of the Mental Number Line , 2022 .

[9]  C. Semenza,et al.  Leftward motion restores number space in neglect , 2009, Cortex.

[10]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Addition goes where the big numbers are: evidence for a reversed operational momentum effect , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  V. Michel,et al.  Recruitment of an Area Involved in Eye Movements During Mental Arithmetic , 2009, Science.

[12]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Impairments of the mental number line for two-digit numbers in neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[13]  Pom Charras,et al.  Is 26 + 26 smaller than 24 + 28? Estimating the approximate magnitude of repeated versus different numbers , 2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[14]  K Moeller,et al.  Operational Momentum Affects Eye Fixation Behaviour , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  Michael Andres,et al.  Causal role of spatial attention in arithmetic problem solving: Evidence from left unilateral neglect , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Walking boosts your performance in making additions and subtractions , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[17]  Oliver Lindemann,et al.  Operational momentum in numerosity production judgments of multi-digit number problems , 2011 .

[18]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  The Number Space and Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[19]  M Raab,et al.  Moving your Eyes to Solution: Effects of Movements on the Perception of a Problem-Solving Task , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Visuospatial priming of the mental number line , 2008, Cognition.

[22]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Mental movements without magnitude? A study of spatial biases in symbolic arithmetic , 2008, Cognition.

[23]  M. Pesenti,et al.  Spatial bias in symbolic and non-symbolic numerical comparison in neglect , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Koleen McCrink,et al.  Operational momentum in large-number addition and subtraction by 9-month-olds. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Mauro Pesenti,et al.  Attentional Bias Induced by Solving Simple and Complex Addition and Subtraction Problems , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  M. Ashcraft Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory , 1992, Cognition.

[27]  Wim Fias,et al.  Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[28]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Spatial Associations in Numerical Cognition—From Single Digits to Arithmetic , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[29]  Harold Bekkering,et al.  Spatial Interferences in Mental Arithmetic: Evidence from the Motion–Arithmetic Compatibility Effect , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  Steffen Zitzmann,et al.  Examining the Presence and Determinants of Operational Momentum in Childhood , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[31]  Tyler Marghetis,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Doing Arithmetic by Hand: Hand Movements during Exact Arithmetic Reveal Systematic, Dynamic Spatial Processing , 2022 .

[32]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Moving along the Number Line: Operational Momentum in Nonsymbolic Arithmetic , 2006 .

[33]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Heterogeneous Nature of Number–Space Interactions , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[34]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Can Approximate Mental Calculation Account for Operational Momentum in Addition and Subtraction? , 2022 .

[35]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[36]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Dynamic representations underlying symbolic and nonsymbolic calculation: Evidence from the operational momentum effect , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  Heed the Signs: Operation Signs have Spatial Associations , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[38]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Counting Is Easier while Experiencing a Congruent Motion , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  D. Boisson,et al.  Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation? , 2004, Psychological science.

[40]  Tom Verguts,et al.  Spatial Intuition in Elementary Arithmetic: A Neurocomputational Account , 2012, PloS one.