Automotive Supply Chain Evaluation with Conventional Model and Integrated Model

ABSTRACT: Increasing competition due to market globalization, product diversity and technological breakthroughs stimulates independent automotive companies to collaborate in a supply chain that allows them to gain mutual benefits. Especially the events of the past years have shell-shocked even the most ardent industry participants – a crisis and the following hard recovery. Not only the critical challenges in implementing process lean with low cost and high quality, also critical to success is the ability to efficiently meet stricter emissions and fuel economy standards escalating in most jurisdictions. With all the factors working beneath the waves, supply chain management becomes the core source of a company’s competitive advantages and even the trump of the entire automotive industry’s success. A proper supply chain strategy provides financial returns and other key factors superior to the old concepts which brought profits before but no longer up to date now. Correctly design and effectively evaluate the supply chains, and improve the supply chain structure dynamically over time, are the key methods for an automotive company to survive and succeed in the volatile and critical automobile industrial environment. In this research work, based on the real case study in the automotive door system supply, different supply chain scenarios are designed and corresponding performance evaluations are made by applying different methods, namely the conventional model and the integrated model with their corresponding algorithms. With conventional model, the evaluation is done from different aspects, where the chosen perspectives such as costs, flexibility, stability, and reliability are assessed respectively for the multi-stage international supply chains. The data applied in this model comes from real-case door module supply, and the evaluation results helps in the decision making in localization process of that certain project. To be able to evaluate more complicated supply chain scenarios in a more accurate and efficient way, an integrated model is designed for the comprehensive performance evaluation. Based on the fuzzy theory, a MDFIE (Multilevel Dynamic Fuzzy Integrated Evaluation) algorithm is developed to assess the automotive supply chain performance. With the real case of vehicle door system supply, a detailed index system is designed based on a profound understanding of the automotive door supply chain. And with this new method, supply chain scenarios with different outsource degree and integration degree are evaluated and analyzed, a positive solution of deeper integration and downstream task shifting in the automotive supply structure is concluded in the end. In addition to the use in this research work, the integrated model, especially the index system can be flexibly adjusted for other automotive supply chains under their special interest and requirements. And with the MDFIE algorithm or other possible methods, the model can also be further developed into user-friendly software or system for the normal application. This software development is suggested for the further research. Based on the researches done in this work, a new tier structure is proposed as well. A mega system supplier which is defined as the new Tier 0,5 and other outsourced service companies which are playing as the half tiers (tier 1,5/ 2,5…) are discussed in this work. With all the theoretical researches and practical investigations, this new structure which occupies the niche positions of supply chain is supposed to be benefiting the entire automotive supply chain in many critical aspects, like the long lasting over capacity problem and the coming E-mobility trend. Some other suggestions like the application of RFID technology are also proposed for increasing the productivity and strengthen the information flow along supply chain. In general, improving the entire automotive supply chain performance, is the ultimate goal of supply chain management, which means balancing all participators’ maximum profits and offering the highest market service level. The realization of the proposals and concepts, is also supposed to be studied in the further research.

[1]  Göran Persson,et al.  Organisation Design Strategies for Business Logistics , 1997 .

[2]  Sun Hur,et al.  Integrated process planning and scheduling with minimizing total tardiness in multi-plants supply chain , 2002 .

[3]  Shan Feng,et al.  Decision support for fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of urban development , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[4]  L. Stern,et al.  The Environment of Marketing Channel Dyads: A Framework for Comparative Analysis , 1983 .

[5]  P. Wangphanich,et al.  Analysis of the bullwhip effect in multi-product, multi-stage supply chain systems–a simulation approach , 2010 .

[6]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Measuring supply chain performance , 1999 .

[7]  Uta Jüttner Supply chain risk management: Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective , 2005 .

[8]  Zuhua Jiang,et al.  Routing for the Milk-Run Pickup System in Automobile Parts Supply , 2009, DET.

[9]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Competing—and Learning—in Modular Markets , 2001 .

[10]  B. Davis TRANSPORT-RELATED IMPACTS OF THE NORTHRIDGE EARTHQUAKE , 1998 .

[11]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Designing the design process , 1990 .

[12]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[13]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  A framework for supply chain performance measurement , 2004 .

[14]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Supply chain management: an analytical framework for critical literature review , 2000 .

[15]  M. Cooper,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PURCHASING AND LOGISTICS STRATEGY. , 1993 .

[16]  Thomas Sommer-Dittrich,et al.  Current Issues at OEMs and Suppliers , 2008 .

[17]  Heng Li,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) , 2002 .

[18]  Aneil K. Mishra,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. , 1995 .

[19]  Supply Chain Risk by Structure , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics, and Informatics.

[20]  Arnold Picot,et al.  Information, Organization and Management , 2008 .

[21]  Richard A. Spreng,et al.  A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction , 1996 .

[22]  Thomas Yew Sing Lee Supply Chain Risk Management , 2008, Int. J. Inf. Decis. Sci..

[23]  Ahm Shamsuzzoha,et al.  Reconfiguring product development process in auto industries for mass customisation , 2009 .

[24]  Matthias Holweg,et al.  Linking Product Variety to Order-Fulfillment Strategies , 2004, Interfaces.

[25]  Seyed Hassan Ghodsypour,et al.  A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming , 1998 .

[26]  J. Mentzer,et al.  AN EFFICIENCY EFFECTIVENESS APPROACH TO LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[27]  A.C. Lyons,et al.  Factors influencing the design of build-to-order supply chains , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574).

[28]  Wang Zhe TOCO total assessment tool for decision-making on IP supplier selection , 2004 .

[29]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect , 1997 .

[30]  N. Anantharaman,et al.  Vendor rating in purchasing scenario: a confidence interval approach , 2001 .

[31]  Chen H. Chung Balancing the Two Dimensions of Time for Time-Based Competition , 1999 .

[32]  Fu Yu Case-Based Reasoning for Supply Chain Risk Assessment , 2005 .

[33]  Tetsuya Yamada,et al.  Search for Alternatives and Collaboration with Incumbents: Two-Sided Sourcing Behavior in Business Markets , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[34]  Mansooreh Mollaghasemi,et al.  Supply chain simulation modeling made easy: An innovative approach , 2007, 2007 Winter Simulation Conference.

[35]  R. Grant Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, Applications , 1991 .

[36]  Ching-Hsue Cheng Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function , 1997 .

[37]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Co-ordination and integration mechanisms to manage logistics processes across supply networks , 2003 .

[38]  Ming Luo,et al.  A Reliability Evaluation of Supply Chain: Indicator System and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation , 2007, CONFENIS.

[39]  W. C. Benton,et al.  The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction , 2005 .

[40]  Terry P. Harrison,et al.  Global Supply Chain Management at Digital Equipment Corporation , 1995 .

[41]  Kin Keung Lai,et al.  A Rough Set Approach on Supply Chain Dynamic Performance Measurement , 2008, KES-AMSTA.

[42]  N. Anantharaman,et al.  A MULTI-CRITERIA GROUP DECISIONMAKING MODEL FOR SUPPLIER RATING , 2002 .

[43]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities , 2000 .

[44]  Henry C. W. Lau,et al.  A simulation approach in supply chain management , 2002 .

[45]  Eonkyung Lee,et al.  Supplier selection and management system considering relationships in supply chain management , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[46]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Configurations of Organizational Effectiveness and Efficiency , 1993 .

[47]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  Sourcing Concepts: Matching Product Architecture, Task Interface, Supplier Competence and Supplier Relationship , 2003 .

[48]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[49]  M. Christopher,et al.  Developing strategic partnerships in the supply chain: a practitioner perspective , 2000 .

[50]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[51]  Asbjoern M. Bonvik,et al.  Operating high variability manufacturing systems , 1995, Proceedings of the Eleventh Biennial University/Government/ Industry Microelectronics Symposium.

[52]  John A. Muckstadt,et al.  Guidelines for Collaborative Supply Chain System Design and Operation , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[53]  Ji Ju-liang Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on improved analytic hierarchy process , 2004 .

[54]  Ge Wang,et al.  Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology , 2004 .

[55]  Christof Göbel Flexible interorganisatorische Kopplung von Geschäftsprozessen : Simulative Flexibilitätsanalyse am Beispiel einer Automotive Supply Chain , 2005 .

[56]  M. Porter Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[57]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems , 2006 .

[58]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  Heuristics-based integrated decisionsfor logistics network systems , 2004 .

[59]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Evaluation of supply chain business process improvements using simulation , 2005, Int. J. Simul. Process. Model..

[60]  J. Jayaram,et al.  Supply Chain Management: A Strategic Perspective , 1997 .

[61]  Selim Zaim,et al.  Hybrid analytical hierarchy process model for supplier selection , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[62]  H. Trussell,et al.  Constructing membership functions using statistical data , 1986 .

[63]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Integrated supply chain design using multi-criteria optimization , 2008 .

[64]  T. Saaty How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[65]  Chris Butterworth,et al.  Value Stream Management , 1998 .

[66]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Sourcing By Design: Product Complexity and the Supply Chain , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[67]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2004, Appl. Soft Comput..

[68]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[69]  C. Grönroos,et al.  Service productivity: Towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services , 2004 .

[70]  D. Lambert,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT -- MORE THAN A NEW NAME FOR LOGISTICS , 1997 .

[71]  K. Tan Supply Chain Management: Practices, Concerns, and Performance Issues , 2002 .

[72]  Gregory M. Magnan,et al.  The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration , 2002 .

[73]  Thomas Sommer-Dittrich,et al.  An Overview of Modular Car Architecture: the OEMS Perspective on Why and How , 2008 .

[74]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  The role of forecasting on bullwhip effect for E-SCM applications , 2008 .

[75]  Li Juan,et al.  Reliability analysis and evaluation on member enterprise of manufacturing supply chain based on BP neural network , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings.

[76]  C. Harland Supply Chain Management: Relationships, Chains and Networks , 1996 .

[77]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight , 1994, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems..

[78]  Dunbing Tang,et al.  Product lifecycle management for automotive development focusing on supplier integration , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[79]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation , 1992 .

[80]  G. Reiner,et al.  Customized supply chain design: Problems and alternatives for a production company in the food industry. A simulation based analysis , 2004 .

[81]  J. Mikkola Modularity, outsourcing, and inter-firm learning , 2000 .

[82]  D. Towill Industrial dynamics modelling of supply chains , 1996 .

[83]  George Archibald,et al.  Supply chain vs. supply chain: using simulation to compete beyond the four walls , 1999, WSC '99.

[84]  Sean P. Willems,et al.  Optimizing the Supply Chain Configuration for New Products , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[85]  Petro Georgiou,et al.  The Goal Paradigm and Notes Towards a Counter Paradigm , 1973 .

[86]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  Supply chain networks, electronic commerce, and supply side and demand side risk , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[87]  Paolo Guerrieri,et al.  Technology and international competitiveness: The interdependence between manufacturing and producer services , 2005 .

[88]  P. Helo,et al.  Literature overview of modularity in world automotive industries , 2008, PICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology.

[89]  Wen-Chyuan Chiang,et al.  Integrating purchasing and routing in a propane gas supply chain , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[90]  K. Langfield-Smith,et al.  Developing Co-operative Buyer–Supplier Relationships: A Case Study of Toyota , 1998 .

[91]  Thomas J. Kull,et al.  Evaluation criteria development and assessment of purchasing and supply management journals , 2007 .

[92]  L. D. Boer,et al.  Designing Ordering and Inventory Management Methodologies for Purchased Parts , 2002 .

[93]  Flexibilität und Stabilität in der automobilen Supply Chain — Anforderungen und Lösungsansätze , 2008 .

[94]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Build‐to‐order supply chain management: a literature review and framework for development , 2005 .

[95]  Jayashankar M. Swaminathan,et al.  Modeling Supply Chain Dynamics: A Multiagent Approach , 1998 .

[96]  Thomas Seidel,et al.  Network Design for Build-to-Order Automotive Production , 2008 .

[97]  M. Howard,et al.  Automotive supplier parks: An imperative for build-to-order? , 2006 .

[98]  Nejat Karabakal,et al.  Supply-Chain Analysis at Volkswagen of America , 2000, Interfaces.

[99]  Chen Zhi-xiang Model and Algorithms of Supply and Demand Coordination Performance Measurement Based on ANP Theory , 2004 .

[100]  A. Cakravastia,et al.  Integrated model for supplier selection and negotiation in a make-to-order environment , 2004 .

[101]  Ma Shihua The Study for Elements and Characters of Integrated logistics capability , 2004 .

[102]  M. Porter,et al.  Industrial Ecology and Competitiveness , 1998 .

[103]  K. Narasimhan Operations Management: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management , 2004 .

[104]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Computer-assisted supply chain configuration based on supply chain operations reference (SCOR) model , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[105]  G. Zsidisin Managerial Perceptions of Supply Risk , 2003 .

[106]  Michel Tollenaere,et al.  Modular and platform methods for product family design: literature analysis , 2005, J. Intell. Manuf..

[107]  Keely L. Croxton,et al.  The Supply Chain Management Processes , 2001 .

[108]  A. Coughlan Competition and Cooperation in Marketing Channel Choice: Theory and Application , 1985 .

[109]  Rajiv Kumar,et al.  The Automotive Supply Chain: Global Trends and Asian Perspectives , 2002 .

[110]  Mich Tvede,et al.  Benchmark Selection: An Axiomatic Approach , 2001 .

[111]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[112]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Competitive and Cooperative Inventory Policies in a Two-Stage Supply Chain , 1999 .

[113]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[114]  Gary K. Jones,et al.  Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition , 2001 .

[115]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular architectures, knowledge assets and organisational learning: new management processes for product creation , 2000, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[116]  L. Giunipero,et al.  Purchasing's Role in Supply Chain Management , 1996 .

[117]  Janis Grabis,et al.  Supply Chain Configuration: Concepts, Solutions, and Applications , 2010 .

[118]  M. Ebers The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks , 1997 .