Variable Stiffness Control with Strict Frequency Domain Constraints for Physical Human-Robot Interaction

Variable impedance control is advantageous for physical human-robot interaction to improve safety, adaptability and many other aspects. This paper presents a gain-scheduled variable stiffness control approach under strict frequency-domain constraints. Firstly, to reduce conservativeness, we characterize and constrain the impedance rendering, actuator saturation, disturbance/noise rejection and passivity requirements into their specific frequency bands. This relaxation makes sense because of the restricted frequency properties of the interactive robots. Secondly, a gain-scheduled method is taken to regulate the controller gains with respect to the desired stiffness. Thirdly, the scheduling function is parameterized via a nonsmooth optimization method. Finally, the proposed approach is validated by simulations, experiments and comparisons with a gain-fixed passivity-based PID method.

[1]  Zhuo Yang,et al.  Augmented virtual stiffness rendering of a cable-driven SEA for human-robot interaction , 2017, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica.

[2]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[3]  Riccardo Muradore,et al.  An Energy Tank-Based Interactive Control Architecture for Autonomous and Teleoperated Robotic Surgery , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Ningbo Yu,et al.  Impedance control of a cable-driven SEA with mixed H2/H∞ synthesis , 2019, ArXiv.

[5]  Xiang Li,et al.  Iterative learning impedance control for rehabilitation robots driven by series elastic actuators , 2018, Autom..

[6]  Zoe Doulgeri,et al.  Progressive Automation with DMP Synchronization and Variable Stiffness Control , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[7]  Cristian Secchi,et al.  A tank-based approach to impedance control with variable stiffness , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Multi-model, multi-objective tuning of fixed-structure controllers , 2014, 2014 European Control Conference (ECC).

[9]  Jing Xia,et al.  Interconnection and Damping Assignment Passivity-Based Impedance Control of a Compliant Assistive Robot for Physical Human–Robot Interactions , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[10]  Martin Buss,et al.  Force Tracking Impedance Control with Variable Target Stiffness , 2008 .

[11]  Lorenzo Sabattini,et al.  Variable admittance control preventing undesired oscillating behaviors in physical human-robot interaction , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[12]  Ningbo Yu,et al.  Passivity guaranteed stiffness control with multiple frequency band specifications for a cable-driven series elastic actuator , 2019, ArXiv.

[13]  Nikos A. Aspragathos,et al.  Online Stability in Human-Robot Cooperation with Admittance Control , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[14]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Variable admittance control of a four-degree-of-freedom intelligent assist device , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Nikos A. Aspragathos,et al.  Reinforcement learning of variable admittance control for human-robot co-manipulation , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[16]  Stefan Schaal,et al.  Learning variable impedance control , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Lorenzo Molinari Tosatti,et al.  Impedance control based force-tracking algorithm for interaction robotics tasks: An analytically force overshoots-free approach , 2015, 2015 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO).

[18]  J. Edward Colgate.  The control of dynamically interacting systems , 1988 .

[19]  Sungchul Kang,et al.  Frequency Domain Stability Observer and Active Damping Control for Stable Haptic Interaction , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  The small-gain theorem, the passivity theorem and their equivalence , 1972 .

[21]  Masayoshi Tomizuka,et al.  Robust Passivity and Passivity Relaxation for Impedance Control of Flexible-Joint Robots with Inner-Loop Torque Control , 2018, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[22]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  General Model of Human-Robot Cooperation Using a Novel Velocity Based Variable Impedance Control , 2007, Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC'07).

[23]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[24]  Chenguang Yang,et al.  Adaptive Neural Network Based Variable Stiffness Control of Uncertain Robotic Systems Using Disturbance Observer , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  Pierre Apkarian,et al.  Automated tuning of gain-scheduled control systems , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[26]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Variable Impedance Control of Redundant Manipulators for Intuitive Human–Robot Physical Interaction , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[27]  Toru Tsumugiwa,et al.  Variable impedance control based on estimation of human arm stiffness for human-robot cooperative calligraphic task , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).