Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading and Grid Control Communications Solutions' Feasibility Assessment Based on Key Performance Indicators

Selection of the most appropriate communications technology for a smart grid (SG) application is far from trivial. We propose such a feasibility assessment starting from identification of key performance indicators (KPIs) required for peer-to-peer (P2P) energy trading and grid control operations from a communications perspective. A set of cross-disciplinary KPIs, both quantitative and qualitative, are considered from communications, power, business, actor involvement, financial, and demand side management categories. They serve as a general baseline for use cases, as there have been few previous works attempting to capture the essential features of P2P SG operations. The KPIs are briefly identified along with their relations to P2P energy trading and grid control. A straightforward comparison of the quantitative and qualitative KPIs' impact on technology selection is not feasible. This paper addresses the comparison with: 1) a prioritization of the KPIs using the analytic hierarchy process; 2) a comparison of technology solutions evaluated in our previous works against the KPIs' requirements; and 3) a total feasibility evaluation of the solutions against selected KPIs. The prioritization shows latency, reliability, security, scalability, robustness, costs of information and communication technologies (ICT) devices, and costs of ICT deployment are the most important KPIs in enabling P2P energy trading and grid control. Further, the technology feasibility assessment enables identification of the most suitable candidates for an SG application.

[1]  Juho Markkula,et al.  LTE and hybrid sensor-LTE network performances in smart grid demand response scenarios , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[2]  Nuno Pratas,et al.  What can wireless cellular technologies do about the upcoming smart metering traffic? , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Juho Markkula,et al.  Ad Hoc LTE Method for Resilient Smart Grid Communications , 2018, Wirel. Pers. Commun..

[4]  Jesus Alonso-Zarate,et al.  Handling mission-critical communication in smart grid distribution automation services through LTE , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm).

[5]  Hao Xu,et al.  An overview of 3GPP enhancements on machine to machine communications , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Tho Le-Ngoc,et al.  Challenges and research opportunities in wireless communication networks for smart grid , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[7]  Lei Zheng,et al.  Reliable Wireless Communication Networks for Demand Response Control , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[8]  H. Farhangi,et al.  The path of the smart grid , 2010, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[9]  Carlos A. Pomalaza-Raez,et al.  Application-Driven Analytic Toolbox for WSNs , 2009, ADHOC-NOW.

[10]  Saifur Rahman,et al.  Communication network requirements for major smart grid applications in HAN, NAN and WAN , 2014, Comput. Networks.

[11]  Jari Iinatti,et al.  Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4k Priority Channel Access with DSSS PHY , 2015 .

[12]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  William J. Hurley,et al.  Transitive calibration of the AHP verbal scale , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Geoffrey Ye Li,et al.  A survey of energy-efficient wireless communications , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[15]  Jin-Woo Jung,et al.  Electric vehicles and smart grid interaction: A review on vehicle to grid and renewable energy sources integration , 2014 .

[16]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Consistency in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: a New Approach , 2006, Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst..

[17]  Hamid Sharif,et al.  A Survey on Cyber Security for Smart Grid Communications , 2012, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.