A LiDAR-based analysis of the effects of slope, vegetation density, and ground surface roughness on travel rates for wildland firefighter escape route mapping

Escape routes are essential components of wildland firefighter safety, providing pre-defined pathways to a safety zone. Among the many factors that affect travel rates along an escape route, landscape conditions such as slope, low-lying vegetation density, and ground surface roughness are particularly influential, and can be measured using airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. In order to develop a robust, quantitative understanding of the effects of these landscape conditions on travel rates, we performed an experiment wherein study participants were timed while walking along a series of transects within a study area dominated by grasses, sagebrush and juniper. We compared resultant travel rates to LiDAR-derived estimates of slope, vegetation density and ground surface roughness using linear mixed effects modelling to quantify the relationships between these landscape conditions and travel rates. The best-fit model revealed significant negative relationships between travel rates and each of the three landscape conditions, suggesting that, in order of decreasing magnitude, as density, slope and roughness increase, travel rates decrease. Model coefficients were used to map travel impedance within the study area using LiDAR data, which enabled mapping the most efficient routes from fire crew locations to safety zones and provided an estimate of travel time.

[1]  N. Glenn,et al.  Relationships of aeolian erosion and deposition with LiDAR-derived landscape surface roughness following wildfire , 2010 .

[2]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[3]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[4]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[5]  M. E. Alexander,et al.  Travel Rates of Alberta Wildland Firefighters Using Escape Routes , 2005 .

[6]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between organisms and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data , 2005 .

[7]  D. J. Chadwick,et al.  Analysis of LiDAR-derived topographic information for characterizing and differentiating landslide morphology and activity , 2006 .

[8]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[9]  J. M. Norman,et al.  Running uphill: energy needs and Naismith's Rule , 2004, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Brent C. Ruby,et al.  WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER LOAD CARRIAGE: EFFECTS ON TRANSIT TIME AND PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSES DURING SIMULATED ESCAPE TO SAFETY ZONE , 2001 .

[11]  Thomas J. Cova,et al.  Identification of firefighter safety zones using lidar , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[12]  R. F. Goldman,et al.  Predicting energy expenditure with loads while standing or walking very slowly. , 1977, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[13]  Gregory I. Snyder.  The 3D Elevation Program: summary of program direction , 2012 .

[14]  Bret W. Butler,et al.  Safe separation distance score: a new metric for evaluating wildland firefighter safety zones using lidar , 2017, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[16]  Nathan J. Wood,et al.  Anisotropic path modeling to assess pedestrian-evacuation potential from Cascadia-related tsunamis in the US Pacific Northwest , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[17]  P. Andrews.  Current status and future needs of the BehavePlus Fire Modeling System , 2014 .

[18]  W. Tobler,et al.  THREE PRESENTATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS AND MODELING , 1993 .

[19]  Jennifer A. Ziegler.  The Story Behind an Organizational List: A Genealogy of Wildland Firefighters’ 10 Standard Fire Orders , 2007 .

[20]  A. Hudak,et al.  Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data , 2008 .

[21]  N. Wood,et al.  Sensitivity of tsunami evacuation modeling to direction and land cover assumptions , 2015 .

[22]  D. Theobald,et al.  A Comparison of Sampling Designs for Monitoring Recreational Trail Impacts in Rocky Mountain National Park , 2009, Environmental management.

[23]  K. Kraus,et al.  ADVANCED DTM GENERATION FROM LIDAR DATA , 2001 .

[24]  Patricia L. Andrews,et al.  Fuels Management-How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings , 2006 .

[25]  R. F. Goldman,et al.  Terrain coefficients for energy cost prediction. , 1972, Journal of applied physiology.

[26]  D. Stow,et al.  Integrating Fire Behavior and Pedestrian Mobility Models to Assess Potential Risk to Humans from Wildfires Within the U.S.–Mexico Border Zone , 2010 .

[27]  M. Finney.  An Overview of FlamMap Fire Modeling Capabilities , 2006 .

[28]  Gregory K. Fryer,et al.  Wildland firefighter entrapment avoidance: modelling evacuation triggers , 2013 .

[29]  Heiko Balzter,et al.  Modelling relationships between birds and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data: a review with case studies from agricultural and woodland environments , 2005 .

[30]  M. Finney.  FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation , 1998 .

[31]  M. Hayes,et al.  Running Uphill: An Experimental Result and its Applications , 1994 .