An Automated Pipeline to Monitor System Performance in Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomic Experiments.

We report the development of a completely automated pipeline to monitor system suitability in bottom-up proteomic experiments. LC-MS/MS runs are automatically imported into Skyline and multiple identification-free metrics are extracted from targeted peptides. These data are then uploaded to the Panorama Skyline document repository where metrics can be viewed in a web-based interface using powerful process control techniques, including Levey-Jennings and Pareto plots. The interface is versatile and takes user input, which allows the user significant control over the visualization of the data. The pipeline is vendor and instrument-type neutral, supports multiple acquisition techniques (e.g., MS 1 filtering, data-independent acquisition, parallel reaction monitoring, and selected reaction monitoring), can track performance of multiple instruments, and requires no manual intervention aside from initial setup. Data can be viewed from any computer with Internet access and a web browser, facilitating sharing of QC data between researchers. Herein, we describe the use of this pipeline, termed Panorama AutoQC, to evaluate LC-MS/MS performance in a range of scenarios including identification of suboptimal instrument performance, evaluation of ultrahigh pressure chromatography, and identification of the major sources of variation throughout years of peptide data collection.

[1]  Michael S. Bereman,et al.  Effects of Column and Gradient Lengths on Peak Capacity and Peptide Identification in Nanoflow LC-MS/MS of Complex Proteomic Samples , 2012, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[2]  Lorenzo J. Vega-Montoto,et al.  QuaMeter: multivendor performance metrics for LC-MS/MS proteomics instrumentation. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  David Bramwell An introduction to statistical process control in research proteomics. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[4]  James O Westgard,et al.  Statistical quality control procedures. , 2013, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[5]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  SIMPATIQCO: A Server-Based Software Suite Which Facilitates Monitoring the Time Course of LC–MS Performance Metrics on Orbitrap Instruments , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  David L Tabb,et al.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics. , 2013, Clinical biochemistry.

[8]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  A framework for installable external tools in Skyline , 2014, Bioinform..

[9]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Panorama: A Targeted Proteomics Knowledge Base , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[10]  David Bramwell,et al.  Application of clinical assay quality control (QC) to multivariate proteomics data: a workflow exemplified by 2-DE QC. , 2013, Journal of proteomics.

[11]  Michael S. Bereman,et al.  Implementation of Statistical Process Control for Proteomic Experiments Via LC MS/MS , 2014, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[12]  Brendan MacLean,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Gene Expression Skyline: an Open Source Document Editor for Creating and Analyzing Targeted Proteomics Experiments , 2022 .

[13]  Joel G. Pounds,et al.  Improved quality control processing of peptide-centric LC-MS proteomics data , 2011, Bioinform..

[14]  John T. Prince,et al.  Metriculator: quality assessment for mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2013, Bioinform..

[15]  James O. Westgard,et al.  Implementation of a multirule, multistage quality control program in a clinical laboratory computer system , 2004, Journal of Medical Systems.

[16]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Quality control in LC‐MS/MS , 2011, Proteomics.

[17]  Michael S Bereman,et al.  Tools for monitoring system suitability in LC MS/MS centric proteomic experiments , 2015, Proteomics.